Here is a graph that I found which implies that it may be...
Notice how it is seemingly swinging out? I wonder if anyone might have any idea about what is causing this anomaly. Also, it seems like the length of
days is increasing. Look here
If this is indeed the case, the implications are bizarre.
Here is what the site said about it and how you can make a computation for yourself.
he following tool allows you to compute the excitation functions of the Earth rotation (according to the "Euler-Liouville" formalism) and to
compare them to the geophysical excitation functions, as far as these later ones are available. Presently the geophysical excitation is restricted to
the atmospheric forcing. Comparison is done through visual plot and computation of the correlation coefficients.
* The observed excitation functions (χx, χy, χz) are computed from the pole coordinates (x,y) and length of day changes ΔLOD of the IERS C04
series (sampling of 1 day, fluctuations > 6 days) according to the equations : χx + i χy=(x-i y) + i/σc d(x-iy)/dt where σc is the Chandler
angular frequency : (σc = 2π/T ( 1 + i / 2 Q), T Chandler period, Q quality factor) and χz=ΔLOD/LOD (LOD=86400 s TAI)
* Effective Atmospheric Angular Momentum Functions provided by the Special Bureau for Atmosphere of the IERS (NCEP-NCAR reanalysis time series)
(ftp.aer.com...) from 1962 to 2005/9/3 (see readme). From 2005/9/3 up to the current week these data are completed by
those of the National Meteorological Center (NMC) (ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov...).
* The atmospheric angular momentum functions are filtered and sampled before comparison. By default the pressure term is associated with oceans
reacting as "Inverted Barometer" (IB) in front of the pressure variations : this is a realist approximation for variations larger than 10 days (for
rough pressure term click the button "Non IB").
* Geodetic Excitation functions are derived from combined series C04 using an algorithm based upon trapezoidal integration of the geodetic
excitation function.
* For the observed axial excitation the effect of zonal gravitational tides is removed.
*
The equatorial excitation function is based upon the knowledge of the Chandler term period T and its quality factor Q. As these parameters are
affected by large uncertainties, we let you the possibility to tune them within the allowed bands (426
Thanks to David Salstein (Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Boston) and Olivier de Viron (Royal Observatory of Belgium) for their respective
advices. C. Bizouard
Length of Days
There seems to be some fairly decent science behind this anomaly. For more information you can go to this site:
Earth's Rotation analysis