It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Google Video Link |
Originally posted by shrunkensimon
I do not believe it is cold fusion, per se, but something else entirely, which would deserve its own area within science.
Anyone remember the guys who produced HHO gas using water and electrolysis?..
This talk was presented on Nov 1, 2005 in San Francisco, Calif at the International Congress on Nanotechnology by New Energy Institute executive director, Steven B Krivit.
Google Video Link |
Energy Invention Suppression Case Statistics
Number of Energy Invention Suppression Incidents - 53 Number of Dead, Missing, or Injured Energy Inventors, Activists, and Associates - 13 Number of Energy Inventors Threatened with Death - 16 Number of Energy Researchers and Associates Imprisoned - 7 Number of Incidents Involving the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) - 4 Number of Incidents Involving the US Government - 27 Number of Inventions Classified Secret by US Patent Office - Approximately 4000 Number of Incidents Involving Oil Companies - 9 Names of Oil Companies and Banks Involved - Standard, Atlantic Richfield, Shell Oil Company, World Bank, Wells Fargo Bank Possibly Most Impressive Energy Invention - Philippines Inventor has Converted More than 100 Cars to Run Only on Plain Water!
Originally posted by UofCinLA
Problem with the whole CF thing, is that the experimental results sometime work and then they don't - often with the exact same inputs i.e. same platinum source cut and used in two separate runs. Yes, most would say something is going on, but the results are of no use if they can not be repeated over and over again.
"We are now certain that heat generation from this process is copious, safe, inexpensive and reproducible, and in terms of commercialization that seems like a perfect place to start."
Once we can get repeatability, next up is scale and practical use. These little lab gizmo's are nifty, but the question becomes how to extract the energy from the system for something useful....
Wired did a very good article a while back ~2000 maybe - search for it, where they flushed all of this out in detail. Last time I checked, none of the people in the Wired piece were threatened or whacked by anyone and please remember, companies are out to make a profit. If CF works, companies would/will be tripping over themselves and each other to bring this to market as the "cost" of the energy is way cheaper than having 50,000+ employees drilling holes, steering ships and driving tanker trucks around. They would be all over this IF it can be done for numbers better than what they are now doing and you give way too much credit to corporate drones - they have enough trouble figuring out if the conference room is open and where to eat lunch, let alone cooking up some untraceable plot to wipe the world of scientists working on this....