Originally posted by ULTIMA1
But i do expect people who were flagged and set off scanner to be stopped.

Originally posted by thedigirati
yes they can and if "Bob smith" is connected to alquada (sp?) and "john doe" is not.............

Originally posted by Zaphod58
They WERE stopped when they set off the walkthrough. They were stopped and either went through a second walkthrough, or were screened with a handwand, afterwhich it was decided that they weren't carrying anything that couldn't go on the plane (per the FAA rules now) and they were allowed to board. Just because they were allowed to board doesn't mean that they weren't stopped and screened again. Their BAGS weren't, because that wasn't a requirement, but they were.

Originally posted by Zaphod58
But if Bob Smith and John Doe are the same people then they both ARE connected to Al Qaeda. Just because one isn't KNOWN to have been, and one was, it just means that he was good at keeping his identity a secret.

Originally posted by Zaphod58
No. They weren't. Pay attention to what I'm saying here.

Passenger goes through the walkthrough. Walkthrough alarms. At the time of 9/11, there was an option. Either a secondary walkthrough, or a hand held scanner. It was up to the checkpoint, if they had enough people which they did. If they set off the secondary, then they had to be screened with the hand wand.

Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Problem is they had also been flagged as a possible danger besides setting off the scanners. So they had 2 strikes against them, but still were aloud on.

Originally posted by firepilot
The reptilian orbs crashed into WTC, and the secret nuclear warheads in the WTC towers, placed there by Israeli agents, accidentally went off too early, and the heat pulse is what set those cars on fire.

Originally posted by gottago
The burnt-out cars are just a small piece of the overwhelming evidence that the towers were demolished using massive energy sources, most likely classified tech we don't know about.

You truth-deniers like to take one element, like a single sheep from the herd, and attack it like coyotes. I see you have absolutely no response to any of the dozen or so instances of simple physical impossibility that I or anyone else here has listed. All I read from you is that the cars burned, nothing to see here, move on...

In philosophy, it's called sophistry. In real life, it's called trying to change the subject, or trying to weasel out.

Originally posted by SauronThe point is what caused the amount of damage to them.
[edit on 24/3/2007 by Sauron]

Originally posted by Midwest Agenda

Originally posted by Insolubrious
In short I would say its a proximity effect or a side effect of the 'sophisticated' explosive devices used to annihilate the towers. They have been exposed to extreme temperatures.

If by 'sophisticated', you mean Boeing aircraft then, yeah thats exactly what it was.

The thruth-goofers should stop claiming so many things brought down the towers and try to focus on one fantasy at a time.

They have put forward:

-explosives
-holograms
-space beams
-remote controlled airplanes
- pilots under hipnotic transes
-missiles

Talk about a conspiracy with A.D.D....focus people...F O C U S.

M.Agenda!