posted on Mar, 25 2007 @ 01:22 AM
Offical story this..offical story that...Where IS the "official Story" located exactly?
Are you referring to the NIST report?
Are you referring to the 9/11 Commission?
Articles in Time? Newsweek? Popular Mechanics? NY Times? Boston Globe? A multitude of other media sources?
Programs on PBS? The History Channel?
The perpetrator's repeated confessions?
Bottom line-- there is no Official story. There is what most people believe just because it makes sense to them, and they move on with life.
THEN there are the legions of experts in the areas of law enforcement, disaster relief, fire supression, structural engineering, civil engineering,
controlled demolition, avionics et. al.. that have studied the events of 9/11 AT LENGTH-in tremendous detail-And 99% of them still come to the same
Off to the side you have people that --for whatever reason cannot compute. Cannot do the proper research, be it due to lack of know-how or lack of
want-to. The information is all there for anyone who truely wants to can find it. From a multitude of different souces, a multitude of expert
analyses. Yet it seems more comfortable for some to continue with only a fraction of information concerning 9/11, and often that fraction is peppered
with fallacy, intentional deception, and myth.
-- ok enough with all of that--
What was going on at ground zero after the towers fell on 9/11? Were WTC 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 just sitting there?
Was there nothing much going on in and around those buildings?
Do any of you remember what the firefighters were doing after the towers fell?
Were they trying to put out fires all over the area? I kinda remember sumthin' about that.
Why do the vehicles on the street get an exemption from fire, when WTC 5,6, and 7 do not? Did you see the fires raging in the two towers before they
fell? Do you think the collapse just cooled all that debris immediately?
I don't really understand why common sense didn't prevail on page 1 of this thread.