Conehead Skulls, page 1
privacy
Topic started on 26-12-2003 @ 05:26 AM by PuPP
Comment: After looking at some of these skull images, think of the Egyptian headresses the Pharoahs wore.
Here's an image from Africa, Egypt I believe or Nubia.
Skulls from Ica, Peru and Merida, Mexico
These skulls were photographed by Robert Connolly on his trip around the world during which he was collecting materials about ancient civilizations. The discovery of unusual skulls was thus an unintended "spinoff" of his efforts. Robert Connolly published his photographs on a CD-ROM, titled "The Search For Ancient Wisdom", Cambrix, 1-800-992-8781, in 1995.
The data about the skulls is incomplete, and that makes the correct assessment of their age, context with other hominids, as well as placement of their origin extremely difficult. Some of the skulls are very distinct, as if they belong to entirely different species, remotely similar to genus Homo. The first thing that attracts attention is the size and shape of the cranium in all the specimens. There are 4 different groups represented in the pictures. As a matter of convenience, I labeled them "conehead", "jack-o-lantern" or "J" and "M" based on the shape of the skull, except the first and possibly earliest type of skull, which I call "premodern".
When some of these pictures (the first two) were posted on CompuServe more than year ago, the majority of people assumed that they represented an example of binding of the head, well known to be in fashion in ancient Nubia, Egypt and other cultures. The problem with this theory is that the inside of the cranium of the mentioned skulls, although elongated and with a back sloping, flattened forehead, have the same capacity as normal human skulls; the only difference is the shape achieved by frontal and side deformations. They are actually more similar to the first type of skull (premodern) with the rounded back, than the conehead type. The cone-shaped types of skull are not found amongst the usual skull-binding samples.
The first skull presents problems of its own. The frontal part of the skull seems to belong to an individual of the pre-Neanderthal family, but the lower jaw, though more robust than modern human type, has a modern shape and characteristics. The shape of the cranium does not have any comparison with the Erectus, Neanderthal types, nor the modern human type. Some minor Neanderthal characteristics are present, as is the occipital ridge on the bottom back of the skull and the flattened bottom of the cranium, other characteristics point more tovards Homo Erectus. The angle of the cranial bottom is, though, unusual. We cannot exclude the possibility of a deformed individual in this case, but it is highly unlikely that the angle of the frontal part would require a modification of the lower jaw in the process of growing to resemble modern human types with their projected chin rim. The answer seems to be that the skull belongs to a representantive of an unknown premodern human or humanoid type.
As is obvious from the comparison with a modern human skull, the cranial capacity lies within the modern human range. This is not surprising, since the late Neanderthals and early modern humans (Cro-Magnon) had larger cranial capacities (both roughly 1600 ccm to 1750 ccm) than modern humans (av. 1450 ccm). The decrease of the cranial capacity (sudden at that -- the specimens of modern humans after about 10500 BCE have smaller craniums) is a puzzling matter, but that´s another story.
No less puzzling is what a representative of a premodern human type is doing on the South American continent. According to the orthodox anthropology, this skull simply does not exist, because it cannot be. Textbooks´ oldest date of appearance of humans in North America is about 35000 BCE and much later for South America, based on the diffusion theory assumptions. The only accepted human types entering the continent are of the modern anatomy. There are some other sources that place all types of human genus in both Americas at much earlier dates based on numerous anomalous finds, but the academe sticks to its preconceived notions, no matter what. It´s safer.
More info and images below...
www.enigmas.org...
This site also has some good images.
www.world-mysteries.com...
[Edited on 26-12-2003 by PuPP]
[Edited on 6-4-2004 by John bull 1]
Here's an image from Africa, Egypt I believe or Nubia.
Skulls from Ica, Peru and Merida, Mexico
These skulls were photographed by Robert Connolly on his trip around the world during which he was collecting materials about ancient civilizations. The discovery of unusual skulls was thus an unintended "spinoff" of his efforts. Robert Connolly published his photographs on a CD-ROM, titled "The Search For Ancient Wisdom", Cambrix, 1-800-992-8781, in 1995.
The data about the skulls is incomplete, and that makes the correct assessment of their age, context with other hominids, as well as placement of their origin extremely difficult. Some of the skulls are very distinct, as if they belong to entirely different species, remotely similar to genus Homo. The first thing that attracts attention is the size and shape of the cranium in all the specimens. There are 4 different groups represented in the pictures. As a matter of convenience, I labeled them "conehead", "jack-o-lantern" or "J" and "M" based on the shape of the skull, except the first and possibly earliest type of skull, which I call "premodern".
When some of these pictures (the first two) were posted on CompuServe more than year ago, the majority of people assumed that they represented an example of binding of the head, well known to be in fashion in ancient Nubia, Egypt and other cultures. The problem with this theory is that the inside of the cranium of the mentioned skulls, although elongated and with a back sloping, flattened forehead, have the same capacity as normal human skulls; the only difference is the shape achieved by frontal and side deformations. They are actually more similar to the first type of skull (premodern) with the rounded back, than the conehead type. The cone-shaped types of skull are not found amongst the usual skull-binding samples.
The first skull presents problems of its own. The frontal part of the skull seems to belong to an individual of the pre-Neanderthal family, but the lower jaw, though more robust than modern human type, has a modern shape and characteristics. The shape of the cranium does not have any comparison with the Erectus, Neanderthal types, nor the modern human type. Some minor Neanderthal characteristics are present, as is the occipital ridge on the bottom back of the skull and the flattened bottom of the cranium, other characteristics point more tovards Homo Erectus. The angle of the cranial bottom is, though, unusual. We cannot exclude the possibility of a deformed individual in this case, but it is highly unlikely that the angle of the frontal part would require a modification of the lower jaw in the process of growing to resemble modern human types with their projected chin rim. The answer seems to be that the skull belongs to a representantive of an unknown premodern human or humanoid type.
As is obvious from the comparison with a modern human skull, the cranial capacity lies within the modern human range. This is not surprising, since the late Neanderthals and early modern humans (Cro-Magnon) had larger cranial capacities (both roughly 1600 ccm to 1750 ccm) than modern humans (av. 1450 ccm). The decrease of the cranial capacity (sudden at that -- the specimens of modern humans after about 10500 BCE have smaller craniums) is a puzzling matter, but that´s another story.
No less puzzling is what a representative of a premodern human type is doing on the South American continent. According to the orthodox anthropology, this skull simply does not exist, because it cannot be. Textbooks´ oldest date of appearance of humans in North America is about 35000 BCE and much later for South America, based on the diffusion theory assumptions. The only accepted human types entering the continent are of the modern anatomy. There are some other sources that place all types of human genus in both Americas at much earlier dates based on numerous anomalous finds, but the academe sticks to its preconceived notions, no matter what. It´s safer.
More info and images below...
www.enigmas.org...
This site also has some good images.
www.world-mysteries.com...
[Edited on 26-12-2003 by PuPP]
[Edited on 6-4-2004 by John bull 1]
reply posted on 27-12-2003 @ 05:17 AM by Knightmare
skull binding is a theory, never proven & probably incorporated by those suppressing the truth.
Here is a site among many that have in fact some movies of museums etc, that display such things without using the "binding" as a reason for the formation, in fact, they act like it is the norm for royalty back then.
216.10.26.55...
Here is a site among many that have in fact some movies of museums etc, that display such things without using the "binding" as a reason for the formation, in fact, they act like it is the norm for royalty back then.
216.10.26.55...
Pi, Golden Ratio and Speed of Light encoded into Great Pyramid
Posted 7 days ago with 33 member flags
Posted 7 days ago with 33 member flags
Unknown ancient language found on unearthed Assyrian tablets
Posted 15 days ago with 21 member flags
Posted 15 days ago with 21 member flags
Newest topics, updated in real-time:
Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:
Honors student arrested for truancy...it gets worse.
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 16 hours ago, 18 flags
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 16 hours ago, 18 flags
Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:
Obama Twice Mistakenly Mentions ‘My Sons,' While Defending Contraception Mandate
US Political Madness: 14 hours ago, 95 replies
US Political Madness: 14 hours ago, 95 replies
Honors student arrested for truancy...it gets worse.
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 16 hours ago, 65 replies
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 16 hours ago, 65 replies
Seized from smugglers, the leather-bound 'gospel' which Iran claims will bring down Christianity a
Breaking Alternative News: 16 hours ago, 64 replies
Breaking Alternative News: 16 hours ago, 64 replies
Guards at most well known women's prison in Alabam regularly rape inmates
General Conspiracies: 10 hours ago, 54 replies
General Conspiracies: 10 hours ago, 54 replies
Gun Deaths Outpace Motor Vehicle Deaths in 10 States in 2009 New Analysis Shows
Breaking Alternative News: 14 hours ago, 41 replies
Breaking Alternative News: 14 hours ago, 41 replies
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.163 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.163 seconds
