It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jack Tripper
You need to understand.......the physical damage IS the crime.
This is what tipped everyone off to the fact that something isn't right.
So we went to find out what the witnesses saw and it confirmed our suspicions beyond our wildest imaginations.
The damage is anomalous.
To suggest that the richest most powerful defense agency on earth couldn't have moved a mobile generator trailer in their own backyard during a worldwide psychological operation is simply not logical.
Originally posted by Byrd
I really hate these threads.
That was my brother's office that was hit (long range tactical planning offices.) It WAS a plane. The government didn't do it, because if they had, the office of tactical planning would have had to plan it, and they wouldn't kill off their officers and staff.
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
Why are you an authority greater than the American Society of Civil Engineers in regards to the wing tilt of the plane?
Because this is what you are claiming in order for your hypothesis to be remotely relevant.
If you maintain that this is the case..........your graphics depict a plane that is perfectly level.
How can you reconcile a perfectly level plane with the anomalous damage to the generator trailer as well as the dubious FDR which depicts otherwise?
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
Since left engine (not "wing/engine") is the only thing reportedly or logically low enough to damage the foundation, the lack of clarity over the spot it's said to have gone past/through renders your own case inconclusive at best.