nice very good find

Can you post the original link to the photos used to make these enhancements? It looks convincing enough on these, but I woud like to see the originals.

This is a GREAT FIND. The geometric anomolies are more than abudndant in this sample... an archaeologist might just someday get up there to get the REAL DEAL on what Mars is all about!

OUTSTANDING! VERY WELL DONE!

Cheersbackatcha!
SPout

Originally posted by squiz
A glitch in the 3d data or signs of a coverup?

The perspective views are computer generated using the stereo images taken from overhead, those images are not taken from that perspective.

I think that it probably is a result of inconsistent data on the borders of the image, a similar effect can be seen in other places on the borders of the image.

On the esa website they have deleted the larger TIFF files for these images. Also the site does not show up in some other photos that show the same area.
So this was either airbrushed out of the other photos, or the 3d image has errors

The question is why is mike posting known doctored images of mars . This is the second in a week --the first being the symbols he pasted in the cydonia region and this the second

Originally posted by acmeartifacts
On the esa website they have deleted the larger TIFF files for these images.

Have you seen those TIFF files on previous ocasions? I have the JPG since last year but I do not have the TIFF, and I usualy download both versions.


timoothy
I don't think you can call this image a "doctored image", this is from the official ESA site, not something found by "a friend" like in the other case.

Originally posted by mikesingh

Images Courtesy: ESA
[edit on 25-2-2007 by mikesingh]

Definitely intriguing images... Brings forth the question of Nasa Airbrushing photos before they reach the public eye...Kinda reminds me of the moon base photos, but with more evidentiary Geometric shapes. The Temple I see, but I don't know for sure about a giant water resevoir... This image looks like a lot of the land formation in the area was water eroded(maybe even underwater). If its eroded it was near a riverway.... Maybe the hole is an ancient Pit Mine???
just another opinion..


Coven Out

~~Carson Stole my Tag Line, So I Gave His Girlfriend The Clap~~

Exactly, its an official photo. The problem is this photo shows the anomoly and the others on the same website do not.
So either ESA doctored the anomoly in or airbrushed it out. Either way there is something to this case.

timoothy
I don't think you can call this image a "doctored image", this is from the official ESA site, not something found by "a friend" like in the other case.

Originally posted by acmeartifacts
The problem is this photo shows the anomoly and the others on the same website do not.

This is not a photo, its a computer generated image using the images taken from overhead.

[edit on 25/2/2007 by ArMaP]

Originally posted by kode
What is the scale of that picture and how big would the object and area be?

The ESA site says that the area is 50km accross, but that is the original image, not the image posted by Mikesingh.

It looks very interesting, but I am curious to see if it really is just odd land formations.

The 'stepping' pattern is more likely due to a lower res 3d model. For these 3d generated images, the 3d mesh detail isn't very high. So it will look more angular. I don't think these 3d images are a good source if you're wanting accurate detail. Best to stick with actual photos in my opinion.

I'm not an expert on photography but that's probably what you get for using CGI with the photos so you can accurately tell what the landscape is like. I say that the photos aren't more then a mere odd formation in land.