It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Truth About September 11 2001.

page: 2
2
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 22 2007 @ 01:13 PM
link   


Stop talking about anthrax


Why, because its inconvenient for you? The Anthrax Attacks were connected to 9/11, coming within a week of the attacks on the WTC and the Pentagon. Or is your memory so selective that you fail to make the connection?




posted on Feb, 22 2007 @ 01:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by superpaul55
Why does everybody link September 11 with Iraq?


Maybe because the Bush Admin started it?


WASHINGTON – In his prime-time press conference last week, which focused almost solely on Iraq, President Bush mentioned Sept. 11 eight times. He referred to Saddam Hussein many more times than that, often in the same breath with Sept. 11.


Source: www.csmonitor.com...


(CBS) In the aftermath of Sept. 11, President Bush ordered his then top anti-terrorism adviser to look for a link between Iraq and the attacks, despite being told there didn't seem to be one.

The charge comes from the adviser, Richard Clarke, in an exclusive interview on 60 Minutes.


Source: www.cbsnews.com...


MR. RUSSERT: The Washington Post asked the American people about Saddam Hussein, and this is what they said: 69 percent said he was involved in the September 11 attacks. Are you surprised by that?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: No. I think it’s not surprising that people make that connection.

MR. RUSSERT: But is there a connection?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: We don’t know. You and I talked about this two years ago. I can remember you asking me this question just a few days after the original attack. At the time I said no, we didn’t have any evidence of that. Subsequent to that, we’ve learned a couple of things. We learned more and more that there was a relationship between Iraq and al-Qaeda that stretched back through most of the decade of the ’90s, that it involved training, for example, on BW and CW, that al-Qaeda sent personnel to Baghdad to get trained on the systems that are involved. The Iraqis providing bomb-making expertise and advice to the al-Qaeda organization.

We know, for example, in connection with the original World Trade Center bombing in ’93 that one of the bombers was Iraqi, returned to Iraq after the attack of ’93. And we’ve learned subsequent to that, since we went into Baghdad and got into the intelligence files, that this individual probably also received financing from the Iraqi government as well as safe haven.

Now, is there a connection between the Iraqi government and the original World Trade Center bombing in ’93? We know, as I say, that one of the perpetrators of that act did, in fact, receive support from the Iraqi government after the fact. With respect to 9/11, of course, we’ve had the story that’s been public out there. The Czechs alleged that Mohamed Atta, the lead attacker, met in Prague with a senior Iraqi intelligence official five months before the attack, but we’ve never been able to develop anymore of that yet either in terms of confirming it or discrediting it. We just don’t know.


Source: www.msnbc.msn.com...


Iraq was invaded because Saddam supposedly had weapons of mass destruction. Stop taling about anthrax and McVeigh, it has nothing to do with 911. I have no interest in people attempting to widen the supposed conspiracy or linking it to irrelevant events.


The anthrax attacks and McVeigh have more to do with 9/11 than Saddam does. They are not irrelevant.



posted on Feb, 22 2007 @ 01:18 PM
link   
Ok then, if 911 and the antrax letters are connected for some reason, what is the reason for this connection. What is the aim of this?



posted on Feb, 22 2007 @ 01:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by superpaul55
Ok then, if 911 and the antrax letters are connected for some reason, what is the reason for this connection. What is the aim of this?


A better question is: Once it was found to be US made anthrax, why did we not hear anything more about it? And why no one has been prosecuted?



posted on Feb, 22 2007 @ 01:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by Vinadetta
Exactly, just like all the people in Germany that believed that Polland was to blame for the Reichstag Fire, we should do the same since that worked out well for that country too.


Uhhh, no, that was blamed on a communist.
What was blamed on poland was the attack on a town,
they dressed a prisoner in a polish uniform and shot him,
said he attacked germany, said he was from poland.



posted on Feb, 22 2007 @ 01:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by Radekus
Uhhh, no, that was blamed on a communist.
What was blamed on poland was the attack on a town,
they dressed a prisoner in a polish uniform and shot him,
said he attacked germany, said he was from poland.



They blamed the Reichstag fire on a communist to wedge people further against the left wing, but the staged Polish attack involved more than just one guy. It was called the Gleiwitz incident.

Edit: OOPS! You were right, they only actually shot that one dude. The rest was just urging people on via radio, staging the guy's death, etc.

[edit on 22-2-2007 by bsbray11]



posted on Feb, 22 2007 @ 01:48 PM
link   


Ok then, if 911 and the antrax letters are connected for some reason, what is the reason for this connection. What is the aim of this?


I would say it is the same aim as this thread: to silence all but officially sanctioned inquiries into 9/11.

The AA's were sent to Patrick Leahy, Tom Daschle, Tom Brokaw, and the editor of the New York Post. Two liberal Senators, a liberal news anchor, and a newspaper. You can't possibly think OBL was behind the AA's. Yet the letters have the date 09-11-01 written right on them.

link to the FBI press release of the letters



posted on Feb, 22 2007 @ 03:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by CameronFox
The thing is next guy.... you ask for evidence...it is presented and in typical CT fashion, the goal posts are moved.



Please don't lump me into the 'CT'er label.

I didn't ask for evidence, I was explaining to the OP, that if he truly believes what he believes, then to help those of us who have some questions by giving some evidence as to why he believes what he does. Not to start a thread with a false premise that all of us who question some things, are looking for anything to blame other than extremist highjackers and a vengeance to strike at the big devil.

Alot of people really need to understand that the world doesn't work in extremes. It's not exactly polar. There is no 'with or against us', black and white, left and right, up and down, Dem and Rep, terrorist and governement, etc, etc..



posted on Feb, 22 2007 @ 04:36 PM
link   
[edit on 22-2-2007 by Grimskull]



posted on Feb, 25 2007 @ 07:01 PM
link   
Sherlock Holmes once observed, when you have removed the impossible, whatever remains, however unlikely, is the truth.

People do things for a whole variety of reasons and the biggest one lies untouched.

Follow the logic.

If someone robs a bank, has the loot and the perfect getaway, why bother to blow up the building and leave a trail of clues behind?
ONce the two planes had slammed into the building, why would anyone have blown up the WTC, when they had achieved all possible goals already? America was clearly "under attack". There was already heavy loss of life. Silverstein could have had his engineers declare the building unsafe and had the city demolish it. And the disruption to the markets would have caused the airline stocks to plummet making PUT OPTION inside dealers a fat cheque. So why would any conspirator have ever considered blowing it up and leaving a trail of clues?

So, theres the question...when are rational people driven to do bizarre things? Consider, who benefits from attending church on Sunday? No-one. Who benefits from eating unleaven bread? No-one. Who benefits from praying to Allah 3 times a day? No-one. Religion is easily the commonest and usually the only reason why sane rational people do things that do not benefit themselves, other people or anyone else.

The question then is, did the demolition of the WTC have any religious significance? Unfortunately, it does on a number of grounds...and all relating to "New Age" philosophy. As endless people point out, the "Illumenati" or what every you want to call them are permanently showering everything with religious symbolism relating to ancient Egypt, eg the All-Seeing Eye of Ra and those of the Ancient Druids of the Wicca.

First, Ancient Egypt. Prior to the Julian calendar, the Middle East was run to a diferent calendar which evolved into the Coptic and now the Ge'ez calendar. Only one openly active religion still keeps to it, the Ethiopian Orthodox Church, yet from them, we can determine what day it would be by the calendar of Ancient Egypt by which Ra, Thoth, Osiris etc were worshipped, figures that run amok through freemasonry. According to this calendar, the year actually started at sunrise on....11th September 2001....at almost precisely the same time that the first jets were hijacked. It is also interesting to note that the three buildings demolished, WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 have almost exactly the same alignment to the foot as the three pyramids at Giza.

Secondly, the Modern Neo-druidic religion which Tony Blair and Cherie Blair and their flunkies are members of. Traditionally, the Ancient Druids used to perform human sacrifices called "Wicker Man" burnings. They would construct vast effigees of humans that were about three or so times bigger than the surrounding buildings (huts in those days). These would be filled with people to be sacrifices and set on fire. The people to be sacrificed HAD TO DIE by burning, falling down was not acceptable. Likewise, not any person was acceptable to the Wiccan gods as sacrifices, they had those widely thourgh by the village folk to be THIEVES OR BANDITS.. now who more closely fits the average Joe's image of a thief or bandit than NY stockbrokers and bankers? Furthermore they would usually build two effigees, one malke and one female, differentiated by a giant phalus, just like the communications tower on the top. When would they do this, at the time of the Vernal Equinox to proclaim the start of all dark things (Winter). But when they switched from the Julian to the Gregorian calendar, they dropped 10 days in 1582, an act that some modern wiccans think to be unnatural, so, in their eyes, 11th September is actually 21st September's aniversary.

Hence, to both threads through the relious muumbo-jumbo of the mason etc, 11th Sept 2001 was of great religious significance....

911 occured, principally, as a human sacrifice to Ancient Pagan Gods...marking the start of a new era of the predominance of evil.



posted on Feb, 25 2007 @ 07:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by superpaul55
Ok then, if 911 and the antrax letters are connected for some reason, what is the reason for this connection. What is the aim of this?
In a single word:FEAR.The gov. needed to put fear in the american people.



posted on Feb, 25 2007 @ 07:31 PM
link   
My point is that crashing the four airliners already gave them al the fear that they needed.

Why blow up the WTC and in particular WTC7 and risk all?

This makes no sense unless some explanation of this irrational behaviour can be found...and this is easily the best and most likeliest.



posted on Feb, 25 2007 @ 08:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by superpaul55
Ok then, if 911 and the antrax letters are connected for some reason, what is the reason for this connection. What is the aim of this?


Suppression of dissention. Both in the government itself and the public. Though the anthrax attacks were primarily done to scare Congress into total acceptance of this war coup.

[edit on 25-2-2007 by Frith]



posted on Feb, 25 2007 @ 09:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by somethingelseIt is also interesting to note that the three buildings demolished, WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 have almost exactly the same alignment to the foot as the three pyramids at Giza.


Sorry, I'm calling bulls$#!!!


Show me how WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7 have the same alignment, "to the foot" as the pyramids in Giza?



posted on Feb, 25 2007 @ 09:34 PM
link   
You ever consider that, GASP! These lunatics believe that "Allah" demands war on the infidels, and America is the greatest Satan. The real injustice isn't "America" it's a battle of power in the middle east.

Just like Hitler used the Jews to blame all of Germany's woe's on, the Islamic Radicals, whose idea of a perfect country was the Taliban run Afghanistan, blames Israel, and America.

Israel because, hey those are damn dirty Jews, and America because we both support and protect them.



I know that's just an insane crazy theory... but hey, IMHO all the facts support this without the need to stretch logic and create shadows to chase.


Besides, Osama is rich, educated, his hate is based in his religious beliefs. Poverty plays little into the leadership of the Terrorist, power is everything, and they want their power.



posted on Feb, 26 2007 @ 01:51 PM
link   
You can bet ur ass the next great genocidal maniac will blame everything on masons, satanists, luciferianists, and members of secret societies, and I would be one of the people to agree with that genocidal maniac.



new topics

top topics



 
2
<< 1   >>

log in

join