It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Goofy into child porn...

page: 1
3
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 9 2007 @ 11:03 AM
link   
Goofy" Arrested on Child Porn Charges

By >WTSP-TV Tampa

ORLANDO, FL -- A Disney actor who plays "Goofy" and "The Beast" from 'Beauty and the Beast' faces 51 counts of child porn in Orlando.

more:

www.firstcoastnews.com...

This prooves that we truly live in a sick, sad world indeed.




posted on Feb, 9 2007 @ 12:55 PM
link   
I realize I'm going to get some flack for this, but..


I think that this case is hardly as bad as many other crimes that are committed.
I mean this guy worked around kids, but not once actedon his 'urges'.

Now, I am curious to see how old the individuals in the alleged child
pornography were, because while I believe putting a 3 year old in
that siuation is exploitation an bordering on abuse (if there was nothig
done to them), I honestly have no problem if the individual(s) are
over 13.


Another thing, what the hell was his roommate doing snooping around
through his stuff.
I'd personaly like to see the roommate arrested as well.

I mean what kind of society are we when we start spying on our
neighbors, goign through there things and being outright snitches.



Another thing,I think child porn can bec onsidered a 'neccessary evil',
I say this based on this thought, would'nt you rather have people
getting off to it in the privacy of there own home, than going out
and raping a child?



posted on Feb, 9 2007 @ 02:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by iori_komei
Another thing,I think child porn can bec onsidered a 'neccessary evil',
I say this based on this thought, would'nt you rather have people
getting off to it in the privacy of there own home, than going out
and raping a child?


Are you completely barking mad?
Just how do you propose to make material with which they can get off on without raping or abusing a child?
How you can even propose such an idea beggars belief.



posted on Feb, 9 2007 @ 02:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by executioner
Are you completely barking mad?
Just how do you propose to make material with which they can get off on without raping or abusing a child?
How you can even propose such an idea beggars belief.


Porn in general is not of abuse and rape.
Just because the subject was younger does not mean it would be.
Porn has lead to drastic lowering of sex-crime rates inc ountries
in which it is readily available.



posted on Feb, 9 2007 @ 02:43 PM
link   
So you want young children to legally pose naked for the sexual gratification of others.
You need to get some therapy mate.
Even the loony left and the pc brigade wouldn't touch this with a barge pole.
The best solution is round the pervs up and stone them to death.



posted on Feb, 9 2007 @ 02:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by executioner
So you want young children to legally pose naked for the sexual gratification of others.
You need to get some therapy mate.
Even the loony left and the pc brigade wouldn't touch this with a barge pole.
The best solution is round the pervs up and stone them to death.


I am making a point why it could be considered a good thing that
could help matters, I am neither advocating it, or saying I am
against it.

I do not need therapy, I just see things without the idiocentricies of
modern religious overtones and culture.

Killing is wrong, regardless of the crime.

[edit on 2/9/2007 by iori_komei]



posted on Feb, 9 2007 @ 02:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by executioner
The best solution is round the pervs up and stone them to death.


Not that I advocate child porn or child rape, but listen to yourself. That's all fine and dandy until someday when something you do becomes a no no. Would you still be advocating for the stone to death then? Let me guess, you're a Christian right?



posted on Feb, 9 2007 @ 03:15 PM
link   
No I'm not a christian mate I have no religious tendencies.
There is no way to rehabilitate a child molester just like there is no way to turn a homosexual straight.
So we have solutions
1 incarcerate them for life with no parole(let the taxpayer pick up the bill for food,clothing and extra guards to keep them safe from the other cons).
Or
2 Death(whilst the stoning option is barbaric it is very cheap).



posted on Feb, 9 2007 @ 03:29 PM
link   
I can't beleive my eyes.


The only response I could offer to ANYONE wh thinks child pornograph is "better" than the physical act upon a minor, would be assuming you are a parent:

YOU take YOUR kids to the beach. YOUR kids do what they do sometimes and pull their pants down, by chance you happen to glance a few yards away to see some dude in a beach chair shielding himself with his towel clearly masturbating to YOUR child......now hows that gonna make you feel pal ? How would anyone restrain themselves from drowning that pervert ?

I can't even type anymore it makes me ill.


CASTRATE THE SICKOS !!!!



posted on Feb, 9 2007 @ 03:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by _DISAVOWED_
CASTRATE THE SICKOS !!!!


Now, that might be a punishment to fit the bill. But, I still think putting someone to death is wrong no matter the crime. And stoning them is the worst way to put someone to death.



posted on Feb, 9 2007 @ 03:52 PM
link   
I would not suggest physical castration, more of something that would induce a "non working member" if you would.

Or just doing this



posted on Feb, 9 2007 @ 03:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by _DISAVOWED_
YOU take YOUR kids to the beach. YOUR kids do what they do sometimes and pull their pants down, by chance you happen to glance a few yards away to see some dude in a beach chair shielding himself with his towel clearly masturbating to YOUR child......now hows that gonna make you feel pal ? How would anyone restrain themselves from drowning that pervert ?

CASTRATE THE SICKOS !!!!



To be honest, I would not have a problem with it, as long as they
did not try anything, or do it right next to them.

Castration is cruel and unusual punishment, and is therefore illegal
under the constitution, well it should be atleast.



posted on Feb, 9 2007 @ 03:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by iori_komei
Castration is cruel and unusual punishment, and is therefore illegal
under the constitution, well it should be atleast.


I'm still torn on this issue. I say a person should have 3 strikes and then be castrated. Same applies to rapists. Either that or for punishment, an eye for an eye. Have big Bubba come in and do to them what they did to the child and/or woman. Sounds inhumane, but these people are inhumane to me.



posted on Feb, 9 2007 @ 03:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by Griff

Originally posted by iori_komei
Castration is cruel and unusual punishment, and is therefore illegal
under the constitution, well it should be atleast.


I'm still torn on this issue. I say a person should have 3 strikes and then be castrated. Same applies to rapists. Either that or for punishment, an eye for an eye. Have big Bubba come in and do to them what they did to the child and/or woman. Sounds inhumane, but these people are inhumane to me.



But than, if you think aboutit, would be just as bad, if not more
so than them.

That's my opinion atleast.



posted on Feb, 9 2007 @ 04:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by iori_komei




To be honest, I would not have a problem with it, as long as they
did not try anything, or do it right next to them.


And what if your child was a little older, say around 6- and he/she caught the guy and asked you "Daddy....what's that man doing ?" Would you lie ?

What if as your putting your child down to sleep and some whacko (no pun intended) was right outside on the front lawn "punching the munchkin" ? What would you say then, oh "no harm no foul?"



posted on Feb, 9 2007 @ 04:04 PM
link   
Well, I agree with somethings Komei says. First of all...well, executioner, if someone is a pedophile, most likely they didn't choose to be.

I agree with you that child porn should be illegal, but pedophilia is like a fetish it cannot be helped. They shouldn't be killed for it. And just because someone is a pedophile, doesn't mean they act on the urges.

Now...a compromise...animated child porn. They have that in Japan its called lolicon. No one is being victimized and it will keep pedophiles happy.

I'm not into it or anything I'm just in the know.



posted on Feb, 9 2007 @ 04:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by iori_komei

But than, if you think aboutit, would be just as bad, if not more
so than them.

That's my opinion atleast.


That's why I said I'm torn. I have no answers.



posted on Feb, 9 2007 @ 04:23 PM
link   
You all fail to understand that this is going to be a very big issue coming up VERY soon because of the advent of the web-cam "tweens" ... Guys and Girls are interacting at a much younger age, and the interaction is going to be like any other interaction between guys and girls.. (experimentation and exploration)

and its going to become a big issue because these kids are going to be producing and recording themselves doing things "we" do .. and they'll be doing it for the benefit of each-other not old perverted losers who can't get laid by people their own age.

What are we going to do? .. Once again children are where we make this world a messed up place.. by telling them one thing and the next moment being a hippy(hypocrite) and doing the exact thing we told them not to..

You wonder why this world is screwy? ... Because its the blind adults leading the youth into a pit with their self-righteous philosophies..
barking mad? .. this world is barking mad... leave him alone, take a gander at yourself.



not like the "moral" smut dis walt just writ
perverted cartoonists, wonder whats left in the vault
to assault these kids


[edit on 2/9/2007 by PuRe EnErGy]



posted on Feb, 9 2007 @ 04:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by _DISAVOWED_
And what if your child was a little older, say around 6- and he/she caught the guy and asked you "Daddy....what's that man doing ?" Would you lie ?


No, I would not lie to them, I would explain to them exactly what he
is doing, lieing to them about that kind of thing only comes back to
bite you in the ass later on anyways.




What if as your putting your child down to sleep and some whacko (no pun intended) was right outside on the front lawn "punching the munchkin" ? What would you say then, oh "no harm no foul?"


Well, I'd tell them to get the F off my lawn, I mean it's my property,
I don't want people on it in the middle of the night, unless I say so,
I could care less if they were masturbating or just dancing.




Originally posted by Kacen
Now...a compromise...animated child porn. They have that in Japan its called lolicon. No one is being victimized and it will keep pedophiles happy.


Well, you're half right.

Loli-con is when it is females.
Shota-con is when it is boys.

And I know that because Japan is my favourite country and I read
alot about its culture.

[edit on 2/9/2007 by iori_komei]



posted on Feb, 9 2007 @ 04:54 PM
link   
the loli-con stuff is not a bad solution, but I think Pedo's should be able to get a "realdoll" that way they can have their fetish and no one or nothing gets hurts or emotionally scarred (I've often thought about opening a "realdoll" brothel, would it be against the law?) (I married a real doll, and she cooks too LOL)

[edit on 9-2-2007 by thedigirati]



new topics

top topics



 
3
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join