The photographer of the picture has posted his picture (he claims the version I posted previously was enhanced) and the circumstances of the picture
here.
His testimony follows:
Charles Miller sent in this photo along with details of a mysterious light he witnessed flying over North Carolina....
Last night (Wednesday, Jan 24) just after 8:30, I was in the backyard smoking a cig and saw a light coming in toward Kings Mountain from the
south-southeast. It was pretty much on the same flight path as some of the air traffic that comes out of Charlotte Douglas, and I didn't think much
of it at first, but as it got closer I could plainly see that the thing didn't have any flashing lights, just a blue-green glare.
I went into the house and got my camera and came back out in the front yard to shoot it as it passed over my house. Even though I know I had the thing
centered in the frame, it came out off-center, but that's the problem with telephoto. Even so, you can tell that it isn't a plane or helicopter, it
was too slow to be a meteor, and was too quiet. I got one shot on the thing and my camera battery suddenly exhausted. The thing continued northward at
a steady pace until it passed behind trees and I lost it.
Today (Thursday, Jan 25), I was surprised to learn that there had been sightings of blue-green lights in the sky all the way from Charlotte, NC to
Greenville/Spartanburg, SC -- and even a report from Kentucky -- and variously described as a meteor, space debris, or a slow-moving ball of light
that changed directions, depending on who was telling the story. The Charlotte Observer newspaper featured the story on their website and requested
any reports and photos from their readers, so I submitted my photo and brief report this afternoon.
The Observer immediately contacted me by phone and asked a few questions about the sighting, and in a matter of minutes they posted a RETOUCHED
version of my photo on their website. Obviously, The Observer cropped the photo down and brightened it by many magnitudes, so the thing on their
website looks like a brightly illuminated disk when, in fact, the thing I saw was more of a hazy glare and was not that bright.
Here is the picture, which he claims is the original, untouched image.
I would love to hear photo experts' opinions. It is a very compelling photograph and story, and there are strong indications of the author's
veracity. He has given his name, he describes the scene in good detail, and he has a picture with something in the foreground to compare it
against.
[edit on 1/25/2007 by Togetic]