It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
When it comes to UFOs, the 'truth' is opinion. One man will need more evidence than another to form a conclusion.
The general populous.
The Washington UFO story is an interesting one, but where exactly are you getting the ETs motives from? Posting some sources/evidence for such claims might help.
Theres really no need for that sort of tone.
I'm sure SwatMedic dosen't need one to land in his garden to believe. As he said, all he wants in concrete proof. Some peoples concrete proof is more than lights in a sky. You are simply exagerating to make asking for more evidence petty. HaveSeen4Myself, your condescending attitude really lets your posts down.
Even the title of the thread sets you up for a fall, why do you refer to skeptics as having 'masks'? Assuming someone with a different opinion to you is 'against the truth' just isn't true and saying it isn't going to help anyone. Your posts are filled with wild claims of behind the scenes diplomacy, that I'd really like to see evidence for.
As for the Washington story, anything more people can post about it would be appreciated. I didn't watch all of the NASA evidence video because I really couldn't stand the music, but I did skip forward and I think I remember the clips.
A. Can know this IS a vehicle or vehicles from another world and
may you explain more about clear messages from these folk
from another place?
B. Can you know that these supposed vehicles were 'driven' by
ET and how could you know IF they've seldom interfered with
someone's military?
C. Can you know that diplomacy is the upmost priority from the
possible occupants of the supposed vehicles?
They demanded that we dismantle and destroy our nuclear weapons as the major condition. They refused to exchange technology citing that we were spiritually unable to handle the technology which we then possessed. They believed that we would use any new technology to destroy each other.
I'm sure SwatMedic dosen't need one to land in his garden to believe. As he said, all he wants in concrete proof. Some peoples concrete proof is more than lights in a sky. You are simply exagerating to make asking for more evidence petty.
The truth as I know it has only one meaning. Why would previous civilizations leave behind so many references to UFOs? Are you calling all of them liars? What would be their motivation? They weren't trying to sell books or hide advanced technology.
Originally posted by SwatMedic
Radar blips, cave painting, lights in the sky. All interesting and possibly something more than just lights but for now, we still have no concrete absolute proof of Alien Spacecraft.
I look at it this way. There HAS to be life more intelligent than what we are have on Earth but, if they are so smart as to get here from light years away then why do they suddenly become so dumb?
If you can build craft that can travel at or beyond light speed, or fold space time then how can you be so dumb as to be "discovered" on simpleton radar or filmed with cameras?
If they are here they would either; remain hidden or make their presence known to us. If they are trying to remain hidden and all these lights in the sky are actually them, then they need to go to the Alien version of PeP Boys and get their stuff fixed.
If their intention is to be seen, then land on the white house lawn and pop the hatch!!
The theory that by showing us glimpses of them that they are preparing us to handle the disclosure of their existence is weak as well. Cavepaintings go back pretty far, so I think they've done enough preparing.
I WANT their to be aliens. I WANT their to be part of a galactic community. But I want PROOF. Not lights in the sky. Not space dust on NASA cameras. Not Flares over Phoenix. Not blips on a Radar screen.
Until we get Katie Couric on the evening news announcing a summit meeting between the President and the Galactic Overlord of Zeta Reticuli, then it wont be proof enough to satiate the throngs of people who WANT concrete evidence instead of conjecture and circumspec sightings.
Originally posted by HaveSeen4Myself
The truth as I know it has only one meaning. Why would previous civilizations leave behind so many references to UFOs?
Are you calling all of them liars?
www.exopolitics.org...
www.ufoevidence.org...
A story that ran on the front page of that many major newspapers, especially in the 1950's, is generally regarded as fact.
choice is theirs and choice is Ours because We are all Us, even "them".
Originally posted by SwatMedic
choice is theirs and choice is Ours because We are all Us, even "them".
In what context are you referring to "Us".
As members of planet earth, as neighbors in the galaxy, as God's children?
Please be more specific and less cryptic.
Confirmation that the First Contact meeting involved extraterrestrials who were effectively spurned for taking what might be considered a principled stand on technology assistance and nuclear weapons comes from the son of a former Navy Commander who claimed that his father had been present at the First Contact event on February 20-21, 1954. According to Charles L. Suggs, a retired Sgt from the US Marine Corps, his father Charles L. Suggs, (1909-1987) was a former Commander with the US Navy who attended the meeting at Edwards Air force base with Eisenhower.
Penalties for disclosing classified information concerning extraterrestrials are quite severe. In December 1953, the Joint Chiefs of Staff issued Army-Navy-Air Force publication 146 that made the unauthorized release of information concerning UFOs a crime under the Espionage Act, punishable by up to 10 years in prison and a $10,000 fine.
Originally posted by IronMan
As I've said before, I wish for a revelation from Governments
that expound the reality of off-world entities, but sadly, if any
such proclamations exist, it may have to come from the aliens
themselves... if they exist.
Originally posted by HaveSeen4Myself
If, in fact, first contact was made in 1954 with representatives of ET races and U.S./world leaders:
1. Would this be important to you and why?
2. How important would this be in historical terms to you?
3. Can you explain our sudden advances in technology starting in the 60's?
4. Why do you defend your skepticism so aggressively?
Originally posted by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal
Originally posted by IronMan
As I've said before, I wish for a revelation from Governments
that expound the reality of off-world entities, but sadly, if any
such proclamations exist, it may have to come from the aliens
themselves... if they exist.
Two words, 17 letters; erusolcsid tcejorp
One word, seven letters; thought