It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Saddam had used Sunni Islam to legitimize his power, building one large Sunni mosque in each Shia city in the south; these mosques were seized by Shias immediately after the regime collapsed. During the 1990s Saddam also used the donations that Shia pilgrims make to the shrines they visit—totaling millions of dollars a month—to finance his Faith Campaign, which spread Sunni practices in Iraq and even declared official tolerance of Wahhabis for the first time, perhaps because of their deep hatred of Shias. Wahhabism is an austere form of Sunni Islam, dominant in Saudi Arabia, that rejects all other interpretations and views Shias as apostates. Wahhabis had traveled up from Arabia in centuries past and sacked Shia shrines. Now Shias were terrified of a Wahhabi threat. They feared that Wahhabis would poison the food distributed to pilgrims. According to a cleric in Najaf, Sheikh Heidar al Mimar, “There were no Sunnis in Najaf before the 1991 intifada, but Saddam brought Wahhabis to the Shia provinces in order to control the Shia. These Wahhabis were very bad with us, and all Shia were afraid of them.” Again and again I heard Iraq’s Shias refer to all Sunnis as Wahhabis.
The Americans, my interlocutor suspected, are trying to provoke an Iraqi civil war so that Sunni Muslim insurgents spend their energies killing their Shia co-religionists rather than soldiers of the Western occupation forces. "I swear to you that we have very good information," my source says, finger stabbing the air in front of him. "One young Iraqi man told us that he was trained by the Americans as a policeman in Baghdad and he spent 70 per cent of his time learning to drive and 30 per cent in weapons training. They said to him: 'Come back in a week.' When he went back, they gave him a mobile phone and told him to drive into a crowded area near a mosque and phone them. He waited in the car but couldn't get the right mobile signal. So he got out of the car to where he received a better signal. Then his car blew up."
Impossible, I think to myself. But then I remember how many times Iraqis in Baghdad have told me similar stories.
Source
Sommer recalled one instance in which he helped a CIA officer and a Delta Force sergeant load two 105 mm howitzer shells into a vehicle in Baghdad's Green Zone. He learned later that they detonated the shells, killing four men -- one of whom was a radical Islamic politician who was the front-runner for elective office.
www.informationclearinghouse.info...
Bin Ladin apparently requested to establish training camps and for assistance in obtaining weapons from Iraq. The Iraqi government, however, never responded. Moreover, two senior Bin Ladin associates have confirmed that there was no collaborative relationship between al Qaeda and Iraq.
Originally posted by UM_Gazz
Does it matter which Islamic sect Al-Qaeda belongs to?
Can you tell me and anyone who reads this what the differences between the Sunnis and Shiites are?
If Al-Qaeda majority is Sunni, wouldn't that lean more toward the theory that Al-Qaeda did indeed have ties with Saddam's regime?
Why is there such a strong sectarian struggle between these two religious sects currently in Iraq?
Which side does Al-Qaeda support in Iraq, Sunni or Shiite?
If Shiites take over in Iraq, what does that mean for Al-Qaeda?
Originally posted by UM_Gazz
One question, can you answer it without searching on Google?
More questions?
Does it matter which Islamic sect Al-Qaeda belongs to?
Can you tell me and anyone who reads this what the differences between the Sunnis and Shiites are?
As the struggle between Sunni and Shiites in Iraq continues to worsen this thread may prove educational for all.
If Al-Qaeda majority is Sunni, wouldn't that lean more toward the theory that Al-Qaeda did indeed have ties with Saddam's regime?
Why is there such a strong sectarian struggle between these two religious sects currently in Iraq?
Which side does Al-Qaeda support in Iraq, Sunni or Shiite?
If Shiites take over in Iraq, what does that mean for Al-Qaeda?
Answer any one or all if you can.
Applause for quality answers.
Originally posted by kozmo
Al Qaeda did have ties to Saddam's regime, although many doubt this. Intelligence has linked several figures of Al Qaeda with Saddam and persons within his regime. Understanding this is why you have Al Qaeda fighting in Iraq, to restore Sunni rule in Iraq.
A senior Iraqi intelligence officer traveled to Sudan three times before finally meeting with Bin Ladin in 1994. From reports, Bin Ladin apparently requested to establish training camps and for assistance in obtaining weapons from Iraq. The Iraqi government, however, never responded. Moreover, two senior Bin Ladin associates have confirmed that there was no collaborative relationship between al Qaeda and Iraq.
Originally posted by UM_Gazz
One question, can you answer it without searching on Google?
Does it matter which Islamic sect Al-Qaeda belongs to?
Can you tell me and anyone who reads this what the differences between the Sunnis and Shiites are?
As the struggle between Sunni and Shiites in Iraq continues to worsen this thread may prove educational for all.
If Al-Qaeda majority is Sunni, wouldn't that lean more toward the theory that Al-Qaeda did indeed have ties with Saddam's regime?
Why is there such a strong sectarian struggle between these two religious sects currently in Iraq?
Which side does Al-Qaeda support in Iraq, Sunni or Shiite?
If Shiites take over in Iraq, what does that mean for Al-Qaeda?
Originally posted by worldwatcher
on a side note, I think it needs to be mentioned that regardless whether a Muslim is sunni or shiite, they are still Muslim and they will unite against a common enemy.