It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
MI5 knows of 30 terror plots and is keeping 1,600 individuals under surveillance, the security service's head has said.
In a speech to academics Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller said the terror threat was "serious" and "growing" and would be "with us for a generation".
She warned future terrorists could mount chemical or nuclear attacks.
Tory security spokesman Patrick Mercer said the UK needed more "spooks and secret agents" to tackle the problem.
Source.
"Over 1,000 arrests have been made under anti-terrorism since 9/11 and out of those, 27 have been found guilty. Out of those 27, only nine have been Muslims,"
Manningham-Buller said it was clear from so-called "martrydom" videos that suicide bombers were motivated in part by "their interpretation as anti-Muslim of UK foreign policy, in particular the UK's involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan".
A growing number of people were moving "from passive sympathy towards active terrorism" through being radicalised or indoctrinated by friends, families or organised training events in Britain and abroad, said Manningham-Buller.
She said television and Internet chatrooms had helped to attract greater numbers.
"Chillingly, we see the results -- young teenagers groomed to be suicide bombers," she said.
Source.
Originally posted by Strangerous
I recommend that you steal, borrow or even buy a copy of The Second Oldest Profession: Spies and Spying in the 20th Century (1986) by Philip Knightley.
His take on the secret services of the world is interesting and may be instructive when looking at statements like this.
A basic summary
Spy agencies are in the business of preserving their future, increasing their budget and the nature of their work means that actual results are impossible to quantify / prove. They use this fact to further their aims.
To paraphrase what they say to their governments:
'We need more money - the threat, which we can't actually prove, is more of a threat than it was before.'
'We've stopped things happening, gives us more money and we'll stop more - we can't prove we've stopped it because it didn't happen.'
'Although that looked like a chance interception it was actually based on careful, dedicated work by us. That's what we spend your money on - can we have some more?'
'It's happened, it's an outrage. If only we'd had more money we'd have stopped that'
His premise is it's all deniable, unprovable, service and governmental ego that keeps the espionage bubble afloat and its actual proven contribution in any war is very doubtful. He has excellent examples of where the talked-up value of intelligence operations in warfare didn't, actually, contribute that much at all - ENIGMA for example.
The statements by the MI5 chief should (IMO) be looked at with this in mind
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
apparently britain is infested with terrorists. Some are even threatening a nuclear detonation to further cower the british population. I hate to say it, but i looks like europe is a losing front on the war on terror.
Originally posted by mr conspiracy
come on guys, do you really believe this sad lonely woman:
look at her.
click on the pic.
she just wants a bit of attention.
Originally posted by alex1981
Im sorry to hear that djohnsto77 There are so many organisations in the U.S. I thought there would be.
MI5 are helping the U.S. an intelligence they get that involves the U.S. is passed on to you mate so hopefully?
Alex
Originally posted by mr conspiracy
come on guys, do you really believe this sad lonely woman:
look at her.
click on the pic.
she just wants a bit of attention.
Originally posted by alex1981
We are not losing MI5 is a outstanding bureau, I know we are moving into dangerous times But MI5 will provalle. I tell you that 97% of the country supports MI5 and we always fight back, We wont lay down and take it!!!
Originally posted by djohnsto77
The much-maligned USA Patriot Act broke down some walls between internal law enforcement (FBI, DEA, ATF, etc.) and intelligence (CIA, and various military intelligence organizations), but still I think it'd be better to have an agency dedicated to internal surveillance to prevent terrorism from happening (like MI5), not mixing the duties of the FBI which are first and foremost there to solve crimes and get clean evidence to be used in court to convict people.