|
|
Topic started on 31-10-2006 @ 03:26 PM by realanswers
|
 
Alex Christopher, the author of Pandora's Box, has a lot of interesting information in regards to the secret operations of the government, aliens,
and the plans of the "New World Order".
Here is an interview with him which includes information about the missing children:
search.think-aboutit.com...
Here are some national reports of missing kids:
www.missingkids.com/en_US/documents/nismart2_overview.pdf
www.sitnews.us...
www.findmissingkids.com...
|
copyright & usage
|
Click here for more Aliens and UFOs topics
Hot Topics
|
Top Topics
|
This Week
|
Subscribe
|
Home
|
reply posted on 31-10-2006 @ 04:02 PM by SwingingMonkey
|
[edit on 31-10-2006 by SwingingMonkey]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-10-2006 @ 04:04 PM by merka
|
     
It seems kind of odd. Why eat skinny children when there are juicy fat adults everywhere in America. You could cut kidnappings by 50% at the very
least and STILL get more nutrients!!!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-10-2006 @ 04:06 PM by stumason
|
200,000 kids missing each year?
Not likely.
I read half way down the first link and, to be frank, started to get somewhat jaded by all the fantastical ideas the two guys where talking about.
I've heard them all before, mind you, but I am far from sold.
200,000 kids.....
Someone would notice....
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 31-10-2006 @ 04:26 PM by realanswers
|
Originally posted by stumason
200,000 kids missing each year?
Not likely.
I read half way down the first link and, to be frank, started to get somewhat jaded by all the fantastical ideas the two guys where talking about.
I've heard them all before, mind you, but I am far from sold.
200,000 kids.....
Someone would notice....
Missing children benign explanation = 340,500 (unknown missing children)
Refer to: www.findmissingkids.com...
200,000 of the 340,500 unknown missing children is a plausible number of the unknown missing possibilities.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-10-2006 @ 04:35 PM by 7Pan7cho7
|
Originally posted by stumason
200,000 kids missing each year?
Not likely.
I read half way down the first link and, to be frank, started to get somewhat jaded by all the fantastical ideas the two guys where talking about.
I've heard them all before, mind you, but I am far from sold.
200,000 kids.....
Someone would notice....
I do have to say that this is possible. Think about for a second, who owns all of the orphanages, the government is in charge of that right? So let's
say that they need 200,000 kids. They just go to every orphanage in the country and either take the kids before they get there, or tell the agency
that the kids now have a home (possibly even paying off some people). So this would cover any children that they didn't want people to know were
missing (i.e. if they required such a large number of children that the public would become outraged if that large of a number turned up missing.
Then there is all of the missing children that are taken from neighborhoods and such places. You've got the kids that run away from home, the ones
that get kicked out of the house and are never heard from again, etc. My point is if they really needed 200,000 or even 500,000 or more i'm sure that
they could do it.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-10-2006 @ 05:00 PM by nowthenlookhere
|
  
Totally impossible. 200,000 kids cannot just disappear without someone noticing. I mean look how US media react when ONE photogenic kid goes
missing!
The findmissingkids.com data can be somewhat misleading. Those huge numbers are arrived at by counting even those kids who only went missing for an
hour at the mall. The number of kids who permanently missing is most likely in the hundreds, certainly not the hundreds of thousands. In fact the site
does go on to say that only(!) 200-300 children are "kidnapped" in the classic sense each year.. so I would say the number who are then killed or...
*eaten* is bound to be commensurately less.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-10-2006 @ 05:02 PM by Indellkoffer
|
Note that this was a 1996 interview (10 years old) about research done before that.
220,000 kids? I don't think so!
Originally posted by 7Pan7cho7
I do have to say that this is possible. Think about for a second, who owns all of the orphanages, the government is in charge of that
right?
Nope. There are not very many orphanages around. The bulk of those are run by various churches. The states prefer to use foster families instead of
orphanages.
They just go to every orphanage in the country and either take the kids before they get there, or tell the agency that the kids now have a
home (possibly even paying off some people).
You sound like you have never met anyone who's been adopted. I can tell you that it's just not as simple as wandering over to the pet store and
picking up a pet. You have to go through a background check and a lot of other things and there's more than one agency monitoring it.
The number of kids missing in any year is around 52,000 -- nonfamily abductions (abductions by friends, potential lovers, etc.)
www.missingkids.com...
The number of kids abducted each year by strangers is around 500.
The first rule in "Deny Ignorance" is "check for independant confirmation of the item... like news stories and statistics.
As to eating humans, that's ridiculous. It takes quite a few years to raise a human and that's a lot of food and resources. Why not just clone off
some cells and do laboratory raised meat? You could get a lot more, get it directly, no fuss, and no need for Truly Stupid Plans That Wouldn't Pass
Muster With A Monkey.
[edit on 31-10-2006 by Indellkoffer]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-10-2006 @ 05:05 PM by 7Pan7cho7
|
I wasn't saying that 200,000 kids that are reported missing are eaten by anything. I was merely stating that if the government needed such a large
number of children it is obtainable. I personally feel that if there were indeed such a number of children required for these activities, the
government would either go to orphanages or have a test tube baby factory where government volunteers or "volunteers" are involved.
I'm not saying that this is happening, but stranger things have happened on this planet.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-10-2006 @ 05:19 PM by DJMessiah
|
It's people who make these kind of claims that further discredits real conspiracies. I think this is another attempt at creating disinformation on
actual theorists.
I can understand that 200,000 children go missing every year, but as food for aliens? No doubt most of these abductions occur through no more than
family member or close relatives.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 31-10-2006 @ 05:19 PM by Prote
|
There are many, many reason why this many children would go missing, even if that is true. It's a bit of a jump to say it's aliens. Surely, if this
is fact, then they have proof that aliens exist then. Where is that?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-10-2006 @ 05:59 PM by 7Pan7cho7
|
Originally posted by Indellkoffer
......You sound like you have never met anyone who's been adopted. I can tell you that it's just not as simple as wandering over to the pet store
and picking up a pet. You have to go through a background check and a lot of other things and there's more than one agency monitoring
it................
[edit on 31-10-2006 by Indellkoffer]
It's obvious that you have no idea what the government is truly capable of. When you are "them" everything is like walking into a pet store and
picking up a pet, and with someone else's credit card. Money isn't an objective to them, and they can find a way to get what they want. As for the
agencies that are monitoring children, I take it that you've never seen somebody's life become erased (no records can be found all of a sudden.). If
they can make known people disappear, how easy it would be to make some little parent less child go away.
Once again, I am not saying that aliens are eating our children, i am saying that the government could come up with this amount of children if
necessary.
Oh yeah, as for the whole why don't they make meat in a lab thing, i have one question for you. How many people do you know that get their hamburgers
from a lab?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-11-2006 @ 01:32 AM by stumason
|
Originally posted by 7Pan7cho7
Oh yeah, as for the whole why don't they make meat in a lab thing, i have one question for you. How many people do you know that get their hamburgers
from a lab?
Thats because most beef is produced from animals less than a year old. Hardly the same as spending years raising and fattening up children for
consumption.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-11-2006 @ 01:43 AM by Gear
|
Yes, those figures are correct. Actually I'm pretty suprised that it isn't more.
But if it was the result of aliens, then I guess child trafficking doesn't exist.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-11-2006 @ 02:55 AM by stumason
|
Originally posted by Gear
Yes, those figures are correct. Actually I'm pretty suprised that it isn't more.
But if it was the result of aliens, then I guess child trafficking doesn't exist.
Ignoring the fact the data is over 10 years old, that figure includes those reported missing for minimal amounts of time. The vast majority of those
200,000 children turn up at home very quickly. Most of the time I imagine they just stayed out late, or went round a friends without telling anyone.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-11-2006 @ 03:50 AM by ixiy
|
Originally posted by merka
It seems kind of odd. Why eat skinny children when there are juicy fat adults everywhere in America. You could cut kidnappings by 50% at the very
least and STILL get more nutrients!!!
Maybe them lizards like lean meat and spring chickens heheheee  Adult humans eat too much rubbish and have bad health problems, guess they don't
know that some pollutants can be pass from mother to child. heheheeee
Maybe that explains why less children go missing now, the planet is too pollutated and so is the food. whahaaaa
Just joking, I hope this is not the real situation.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 1-11-2006 @ 06:25 AM by crowpruitt
|
Originally posted by Gear
Yes, those figures are correct. Actually I'm pretty suprised that it isn't more.
But if it was the result of aliens, then I guess child trafficking doesn't exist.
My thoughts exactly,with all the child sex slave rings in the world(and in Washington)this seems more plausible.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-11-2006 @ 06:34 AM by Grailkeeper
|
I'm sorry, the title alone screams National Enquirer.
(sorry for the one-liner, I had more but must refrain due to R&R's)
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-11-2006 @ 06:58 AM by UofCinLA
|
So what are people really concerned with around here - finding kids or Big Brother..??
If you lojack ALL kids when born, you could at least find them if they went missing, assuming they are still on this planet....
You could do the same with a mandatory DNA scan at birth and keep big brother out of it. Then retest every kid at 5 year intervals (tie it in with
school shots or something).... This ain't so bad - better to have it central somewhere than have to get a mourning family that's lost someone in a
nasty death and they have to cough up combs and crap just to identify their loved one....
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-11-2006 @ 09:22 AM by UniversalFunk
|
Alien pulling up to the drive up window....
"Yeah, I'll take an American with cheese....hold the tomatoes. A side order of Chinese, and ahhh.....chocolate shake. Do I get a toy with that?"
This does seem alittle far fetched, not with the amount of missing children, but by aliens eating them. If they (the aliens) are so far advanced
than us, I would think that they would be able to manufacture what they need to survive. With absolutely no proof to the claim that Earths missing
children are being munched on for dinner, I agree, this falls into National Enquirer news.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |