Originally posted by realanswers
Known alien information is very secretive and some things are even more secretive within that information.
Al Bielek from Philadelphia and Montauk was given information about the missing children: www.bielek.com...
Cynthia (Schneider) Drayer, author of "Protecting Our Children from the Alien Threat" has stated "Humans as a food source. Like cattle we are being
used as a food source. Whether it’s for our meat, our blood, or our secretions, we are prey and aliens are the predator. The high incidence of
missing children around military bases, either above or below ground may be an indication that aliens are housed there and are preying on children.
Children are purer, have less contamination and are preferred."
216.109.125.130.../phi
lip-schneider.htm&w=al+bielek+%22humans+as+a+food+source%22&d=YUGo0pIFNoZA&icp=1&.intl=us
John Lear has stated:
"A slightly more frightening phenomena known as "human mutilations" have occurred on a regular basis and are similar to "cattle mutilations". In
that the human or humans are taken from the street, so to speak, and returned to the same area about 45 minutes to an hour later with their rectums
cored out, their genitals removed, eyes removed from their sockets, and completely drained of blood. In all cases it appeared that the mutilation
procedures occurred while the persons were still alive and conscious. One of our scientists speculates that apparently the human specimens had to be
alive for the samples to be worth anything. Abductions occur on a daily basis throughout the United States to at least 10% of the population."
Refer to his November of 2003 interview: www.coasttocoastam.com...
Most of the time, I would take you to task for spouting off such nonsense (this isnt the skunk works forum); but IndellKofer has rebuffed you nicely,
using common sense, facts, and statistics.
I understand you started this thread, and I understand your desire to defend your opinion, but there has to come a time when you realize that either
1) A race that can travel across such great distances is probably agriculturally self sufficient, thus negating the need to eat human children, or 2)
200,000 children a year is an astronomically high number, and if aliens actually were eating children (and thats a
huge if, there would be no
way that the number could be that high.
Also, your sources are silly. Cynthia Drayer and Al Bielek? These two do nothing but come up with ridiculous theories and then probably get preverse
pleasure from watching people unquestioningly eat it up. The only person you cited as a source that I have even the smallest amount of respect for is
John Lear; and thats not because I think his theories make alot of sense. I respect him because of the milestones he has set in Aviation, but in the
link you provided, either he needs to do his math, or hes going to turn into the next Al Bielek or Preston Nichols.
I guess I just dont understand why you're clinging onto this theory so badly. There is no evidence for it at all, and even if their was evidence for
this, the actual numbers could be nowhere near the epidemic level that you're describing.
