It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
Now back to the topic. Al Qaeda was the hired help for the CIA/Bush admin plot.
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
Please Leveller, ECK is right, your constant mental sexual meanderings about me are clouding your reason and logic, stop insulting ECK and quit picturing me in a PVC racoon suit and get on with the damn debate!
And no, Im not going to your moldy swampy island of overtaxed everything to pick up Saddam, I am going retrieve my certain someone, then meet saddam in Amsterdamn for a bowl of hash and a quiet discussion of whether or not that really is you in that purple dinosaur outfit singing "I Love you, you love me".
Now back to the topic. Al Qaeda was the hired help for the CIA/Bush admin plot.
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
She burned you again, dude. She's right, though. Absolutely right. And by the way, you havn't offered an ounce of proof to back up your position. Pretty weak. But then again, all you've done is attack those who can think for themselves.
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
Oh Leveller, I have little doubt the Saudis had thier fingers in the pie too.
Why do I assume the CIA is involved? Because this kind of crap is exactly up thier alley.
And when you consider CIA operations in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia, plus past associations with them.......
Im sure the Saudis might have had some hand, if nothing else. financing most of it. The have financed the vast majority of terror attacks before, and we cannot forget thier reaction to the two attacks on thier own soil against our troops.
But the Saudis, well, lets just say that thier militayr, let alone black ops, couldnt pull 9/11 off in thier own country with crop dusters crashing into a pile of rocks, let alone what was done in New York.
Originally posted by Leveller
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
She burned you again, dude. She's right, though. Absolutely right. And by the way, you havn't offered an ounce of proof to back up your position. Pretty weak. But then again, all you've done is attack those who can think for themselves.
Nice ass-kissing there dude. I'm proud of you.
(Smacks a little bit of hypocrisy yet again though).There ya go again. Non-intelligent attacks. Skadi burned ya, man. Over and over. If I were you, I'd leave her alone. But then again, it's pretty funny.
As for proof. May I suggest that you stay off your left wing bull# sites for a while. You'll find most of the theory that I have is on mainstream media sites.Yes, that's quite apparent.
Obviously, unlike you, I'm not stating that my theory is fact. That's good, because it is a FACT that half the supposed hijackers are ALIVE right now. You wouldn't know that, though, because you are a lemming. Bark FIDO! Here's your biscuit.I wouldn't be so arrogant.
But if you go and look at how the Saudi regime runs it's country you will find this to be a far more reasonable explanation.Unlike you, I actually have been there. So you can spare me your nonsense.
Of course Al Qaeda could have carried out this attack and done so unaided, but that wouldn't be a conspiracy then would it?
Originally posted by sirCyco
why would they have not closed the embassy?? what "facts" do you have on this??
Originally posted by sirCyco
Look how 9/11 worked. They didn't go around at the time saying we're going to be hit.
publicly no they didnt say anything....but there is some evidence that people were indeed informed about the attacks in advance.
[Edited on 11-19-2003 by sirCyco]
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
Many nations gave us advance warning.