It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Techsnow
I am having a hard time believing that the Bush Sr. Admin could pull of such a deciet back in the day.
Originally posted by shots
Originally posted by Techsnow
I am having a hard time believing that the Bush Sr. Admin could pull of such a deciet back in the day.
Oh the invasion was the real deal alright if it would not have been we would never have gotten the full support of the Arab world.
Originally posted by Jamuhn
Well, bin Laden thought the Saudis were traitors to use Western troops instead of mujahideen. So surely not every part of the Arab world was thrilled about the prospect of American troops on Middle Eastern soil, especially in Saudia Arabia where some of the holier lands are located.
Originally posted by Techsnow
I watched a video on history in the middle east.
The video claimed that Iraq never really did invade Kuwait.
It claimed that the satellite photos showed no troops.
It said there were no troops massing at the airport and there were supposedly no tracks in the desert from tanks...
Any old timers out there, or anyone in the know about this, please share your oppinion.
I am having a hard time believing that the Bush Sr. Admin could pull of such a deciet back in the day.
Originally posted by Techsnow
I don't know what your trying to imply Seeker.
Were these Iraqui troops looting AFTER the after math of the war?
Please tell me why, after the war, did the U.S. impose sations on Iraq to deny Iraq medicine???
Why are there reports now that the U.S. supposedly used depleted uranium in the war?
According to this video, that is?
Why did we tell Saudi Arabia that Sadam was planning to attack them, when in fact there was no evidence of this?
Originally posted by ThePieMaN
No matter what, we got involved all over the sake of Oil. Kuwait was scarfing up Iraqi oil and invading Iraqi territory to do it. Their oilfields run under mutual ground, meaning that the oil fields cross borders. They were supposedly only supposed to pump a certain amount of oil per day and the Kuwaitis violated that agreement and pumped out a lot more which drove the price of oil down. On top of that, since the oil fields were on mutual ground, they were actually stealing from the Iraqi's. Saddam Hussein who had been in a great deal of debt at the time could not afford that to happen and soon after invaded Kuwait. Why we were even involved over an oil dispute remains questionable. There will be people who will attempt to say it was out of his madness this was done, but there was a reason as to why he did it.
Originally posted by Techsnow
No I don't believe everything I read on the net, and please show mercy on me because like I said, I'm just now starting to look into this.
I admit that I posted before I should have. I shouldn't have posted so soon...
I know where you coming from though Seeker but come on.. I think we can both agree that the use of Depleted Uranium in war should be abolished!! I mean the radiation lasts for 4.5 billion years! Why would the US go to that level>?
And you say that other nations supported the sanctions. I must admit that I believe those other nations only went along for certain reasons... be it fear, or propaganda IDK.