It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ferretman2
Big Moser.......
Is that the the questionable Citgo camera?
Does anyone know when it was released?
I think the pentagon cameras showed what happened, take it for what you will.
Originally posted by jaguarmike
Chavez owns Citgo, correct? Puts his "devil" comment into perspective.
“With the release of this videotape, we are one step closer to completing the public record on the September 11 terrorist attacks,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The CITGO tape evidently does not show the Pentagon attack, which the American people can now see for themselves. This videotape was the subject of intense public debate. Now that it has been released to the public, there is no reason for further speculation about what it does or does not show.”
Originally posted by ferretman2
Little fox
“With the release of this videotape, we are one step closer to completing the public record on the September 11 terrorist attacks,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The CITGO tape evidently does not show the Pentagon attack, which the American people can now see for themselves. This videotape was the subject of intense public debate. Now that it has been released to the public, there is no reason for further speculation about what it does or does not show.”
It's amazing that you can actually see something which no one else can.
And what do you actually know about shaped charges.
The Citgo cameras show nothing.
And we'll have to wait till Nov. 9th to view the hotel camera video.
Originally posted by wyldwylly
That video is a but rough to look at and understand other than the time differences and such. I can't possibly understand why those video tape recordings are so crappy, especially seeing that it's suppose to capture liscense plates or theives or whatever.. Doesn't look like they work very well. Some of those are just dummy cameras to make you think you're being watched. (I know this cause I was jumped once and went back to get the tape for the procecution and the camera was just a plastic model)
I still like the video I archived moments after it was air'd. However this video: www.youtube.com...
shows one particular thing that is also on my archived video, the long nosed whatever enters the video at 1:26, then it's in the building at 1:27. One of the best pictures. I'll work on searching for my archived videos on whatever harddrive I was using at the time to see, Cause I know I have one that actually shows the 'annomily' in it's full spectrum about near the middle of the grass just before impact.
I took a screenshot of 1:26 and cropped it down just to where we can see the long nosed something appear on the left. You can easily find it if you head to 1:26 on the video.
Originally posted by subz
Samblack, thats why quite a lot of 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists believe the Pentagon attack is a deliberate honey pot. The deliberate ambiguity surrounding it is designed to perpetuate outlandish theories such as "no plane hit the Pentagon"". The lack of camera footage released and almost complete silence on the fine details from the government is believed to be designed to lure in the wild 9/11 theories, then completely cut them off at the knees by releasing crystal clear footage at a later date - hence killing any credibility the 9/11 truth movement has.
Originally posted by Ed Littlefox
Oh, Yea! ---just like they did with the JFK Assisnation-------nuff said.