It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WolfofWar
So the gas stations own manager isn't reliable enough to state to have knowledge of where his camera was pointed?
thats makes sense.
Sure like the "no planers" that I just mentioned.
But how in the heck they made that 757 hit the building and cause damage to the pentagon that is counterintuitive to a 757
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Sure like the "no planers" that I just mentioned.
Well... I haven't read the whole thread. A SkepticOverlord's work is never done.
But how in the heck they made that 757 hit the building and cause damage to the pentagon that is counterintuitive to a 757
I've always leaned in the direction that a large passenger aircraft struck the Pentagon on 9/11. Now that's not to say there weren't other factors either on the ground in on the aircraft that caused these confusing issues.
In fact, one of the very early credible-sounding theories came out mere weeks after the attack (3-5) from a supposed "insider". The general idea (I don't remember it all) was that competing ultra-dark groups in the Pentagon were intensely at odds. One of these groups supported (covertly) global terrorist operations and planned the attack to "take out" the other group. The plan required a modified 757 hitting just the right spot... and the NYC attacks were back story cover.
The interesting thing is that this theory has been completely cleansed from the Internet, and the site that originated things no longer exists.
Originally posted by Jack Tripper
As I said in the Lloyd thread.....Dylan Avery invited Russell Pickering, Merc and myself to DC as research consultants for Loose Change Final Cut.
I was quite clear in giving Russell credit in this thread and mentioned when I was quoting him.
Originally posted by AGENT_T
Apologies for having to mention it AGAIN!!!!
But it seems like SOME of the newer mods are unable to digest this clearly emphasised material.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
In fact, one of the very early credible-sounding theories came out mere weeks after the attack (3-5) from a supposed "insider". The general idea (I don't remember it all) was that competing ultra-dark groups in the Pentagon were intensely at odds. One of these groups supported (covertly) global terrorist operations and planned the attack to "take out" the other group. The plan required a modified 757 hitting just the right spot... and the NYC attacks were back story cover.
Originally posted by ferretman2
Thanks for the props man but all of your questions are answered in the thread
The queswtins regarding the cameras were never answered. All you stated was that the Citgo manager said the camera was pointing at the pentagon.
So what proof do you have that the hotel camera was not pointing down like it was supposed to be and what proof do have that the citgo camera was pointing at at the pentagon?
Just because the manager said it was??......what about the untold numbers who have stated that they witnessed a plane hit the pentagon?
You have voted Jack Tripper for the Way Above Top Secret award. You have two more votes this month.
Originally posted by ferretman2
From the reaction by most in this thread you've proved the saying....
"there's a sucker born every minute''
Velasquez says the gas station's security cameras are close enough to the Pentagon to have recorded the moment of impact. "I've never seen what the pictures looked like," he said. "The FBI was here within minutes and took the film."
Originally posted by Griff
I have a question Jack.
You say the one employee at the Citgo saw the plane go over on the left of the Citgo while the official story says the flight path was to the right. Did you ask this employee if they saw the plane hit the pentagon and if so, what kind of plane did they say they saw?
Originally posted by Corgidancer
Originally posted by ferretman2
Thanks for the props man but all of your questions are answered in the thread
The queswtins regarding the cameras were never answered. All you stated was that the Citgo manager said the camera was pointing at the pentagon.
So what proof do you have that the hotel camera was not pointing down like it was supposed to be and what proof do have that the citgo camera was pointing at at the pentagon?
Just because the manager said it was??......what about the untold numbers who have stated that they witnessed a plane hit the pentagon?
Yes and I have a question too. Has no one researched where all the people on the flight that crashed into the Pentagon have gone? With all those missing people, surely that is enough proof along with the eyewitnesses that a plane hit the Pentagon.
Originally posted by Jack Tripper
*NOTE* Merc has followed through and this witness corroborates the account of William Legasse who puts the plane to the NORTH (left) of the citgo which is on the OPPOSITE side that it needs to be if it's going to hit the light poles!
(red is official story path blue is witness path)
here is what the camera at mr valasquez's gas station would have seen.
Originally posted by Corgidancer
Originally posted by ferretman2
Has no one researched where all the people on the flight that crashed into the Pentagon have gone?
How do we know that the people didn't land in the real plane in an abandoned military base and they are swimming in vats right at this very moment?