It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In reality, getting bin Laden would have been extraordinarily difficult. He was a moving target deep inside Afghanistan. Most military operations would have been high-risk. What’s more, Clinton was weakened by scandal, and there was no political consensus for bold action, especially with an election weeks away.
Originally posted by seattlelaw
Remember, Clinton had already been accused of 'wag the dog' tactics when he did use military force. He simply could not win.
Originally posted by dgtempeNothing like placing culpability to a past president who ran this country in the best and most prosperous way.
Originally posted by dgtempe
The mess on the dress was none of YOUR business and none of MINE.
Originally posted by Crakeur
So, I ask you again, if he wasn't so important to Clinton, how could the intel that Clinton passed along to Bush have said he was a major threat that should be taken as seriously as possible?
I think that's not the case.
Originally posted by dgtempe
I see the Mocudrama worked on the mentally challenged!
Originally posted by dgtempe
I see the Mocudrama worked on the mentally challenged!