It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TONE23
if you are making a COnstitution for a project please...please...PLEASe.. for the love of god include an "ETHICS" amendment.
posted by iori_komei
“ . . over the last few months been working on a project that's a mix of creating a nation, and I early on needed a constitution for the governing system in said project . . seeing how I agree with the majority of the United States constitution, I decided to use it as the basis for the one I created for my project.
What I'd really like to know from this is what people think of it, what suggestions you have for it, ways you think could make it better. [Edited by Don W]
Originally posted by TONE23
...
The first thing I liked was the term limits defined clearly for the
House of Representatives. But, one the other side of that is my
only criticism so far. I didnt see term limits clearly defined for
the Senate. Maybe just copy the line for the house(I liked it as
it stood alone) and just add Senate instead of H.O.R.(for the
Senate sect.)
...
Sub Section 2: Each Senator shall only be chosen a maximum of three
terms of three years.
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
Why re-write the constitution? what not add amendments to it? isnt that the point of the admendments?
Originally posted by donwhite
Complaint #1. Fixed terms for our president. In a parliamentary
system, it is likely Bush43 would have lost a vote of confidence
after Katrina. That would have resulted in the ruling party repla-
cing him, unless within the ruling party there was no consensus,
in which case, there would be an election.
In most parliamentary countries, elections are to be set between
30 and 60 days after the no confidence vote.
Complaint #2. Our Congress has always been an “ad hoc” legislative body. That is, we pass mostly patch-work laws. Consider our health care system. It has a mix of public and private involvement. In part what kind of health care you get depends on how old, how poor and how rich your are. And not on how sick you are. I regard health care to be a human right. As a practical person, I want to provide everyone with access to health care that we, as a country, can afford. I want one ID card that gives access to all needed medical, dental, optical and psychological care indicated in the individual cases. Individuals should contribute to the cost according to their income.
Immigration. We need one law with one standard and one enforcement agency. It must be adjustable to meet our own needs first. Then it ought to give consideration to the needs of others who want to immigrate here. If we can’t pick people honestly - fairly - then we can use a computerized random choice program.
We must devise some way to require Congress to make BIG decisions
and let bureaucrats make the little one.
A good bureaucracy is essential to a good country.
Complaint #3. The lifetime appointment of Federal judges served
us well especially in the early 1800s when the separation of powers
doctrine was being developed. Now that it is well entrenched in
American democracy, we need to limit judges to one fixed term,
15 years if under age 50 when taking the bench, or 10 years if 50
or older.
Sub Section 4: Supreme court justices shall be voted for by the people.
Sub Section 5: Supreme court justicers may serve for only one term of twenty years.
Mr i_k, what do you think of this?
posted by iori_komei
I got rid of some of the problems associated with having a single president by having an executive council of five individuals. The council members would do the exact same thing the president does, except they have to agree, say to veto a bill, at least three would have to agree to do so. [Edited by Don W]
I've made it where congress would have to meet in full three times a year instead of one and added term limits, in my opinion it's because of those not being present that things like health care and such are left to linger.
I agree with term limits on Supreme Court justices, and that's why this part I think those were good, relevant and well thought out questions, of which I've tried to answer to my best degree.
posted by djohnsto77
This will be our constitution if Liberals continue to thwart our efforts to fight for freedom: Article I
All Legislative, Executive, and Judicial Powers will be held by an Islamic Ayatollah elected to a life term by a High Council of Imams. [Edited by Don W]
posted by iori_komei
Ok, over the last few months [I’ve] been working on a project that's creating a nation . . during this I need a constitution for the governing system in said project . . I agree with the majority of the United States constitution, I decided to use it as the basis for the one I created for my project. What I'd really like to know from this [thread] is what people think of it, what suggestions you have for it, ways you think could make it better. [Edited by Don W]