It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You have voted Regenmacher for the Way Above Top Secret award. You have one more vote left for this month.
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
Just so you know, we did not GO into afhgansitan after 9/11.
Originally posted by dgtempe
Are you serious? You are, arent you?
How much of that money have those people seen?
Originally posted by Vitchilo
... People are so dumb.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
They believe EVERYTHING little bush is saying without proofs..
Originally posted by Vitchilo
The medias should talk about the connections Al-Qaeda-ISI-CIA.... or Mujadeen-ISI-CIA-US department of education...
Spain links suspect in 9/11 plot to Baghdad
David Rose
Sunday March 16, 2003
The Observer
An alleged terrorist accused of helping the 11 September conspirators was invited to a party by the Iraqi ambassador to Spain under his al-Qaeda nom de guerre, according to documents seized by Spanish investigators.
Yusuf Galan, who was photographed being trained at a camp run by Osama bin Laden, is now in jail, awaiting trial in Madrid. The indictment against him, drawn up by investigating judge Baltasar Garzon, claims he was 'directly involved with the preparation and carrying out of the attacks ... by the suicide pilots on 11 September'.
Evidence of Galan's links with Iraqi government officials came to light only recently, as investigators pored through more than 40,000 pages of documents seized in raids at the homes of Galan and seven alleged co-conspirators. The Spanish authorities have supplied copies to lawyers in America, and this week the documents will form part of a dossier to be filed in a federal court in Washington, claiming damages of approximately $100 billion on behalf of more than 2,500 11 September victims.
The lawsuit lists Saddam's government in Iraq as one of its principal defendants, claiming it provided 'material support' to the al-Qaeda terrorists. Under US law, the victims' families do not have to prove active direction or involvement in the details of the 9/11 conspiracy by Iraq, only that Saddam's regime gave al-Qaeda more general assistance in the knowledge that it was planning to attack American targets.
Putin says Iraq planned US attack
Russian President Vladimir Putin says that after the 9/11 attacks Moscow warned Washington that Saddam Hussein was planning attacks on the US.
He said Russia's secret service had information on more than one occasion that Iraq was preparing acts of terror in the US and its facilities worldwide.
He said Russia's secret service had information on more than one occasion that Iraq was preparing acts of terror in the US and its facilities worldwide.
Originally posted by Muaddib
How soon people keep forgetting that the following....
.....
Again why some people want to dismiss these facts and others is astonishing...
Originally posted by mythatsabigprobe
Shouldn't you be directing those comments to the President? He seems to think there was no link between Iraq and 911.
Originally posted by Regenmacher
I'm sorry, I refuse to play the role of an airhead and degrade the topic to such a level of unconsciousness.
"You can't distinguish between Al Qaeda and Saddam when you talk about the war on terror,"
President Bush-September 25, 2002
Originally posted by subz
Thank you for doing that leg work for me Regenmacher. You clearly show the misimpression between Saddam and 9/11 that the Bush administration actively and covertly (through implication) concocted. Since I have been away for the weekend it was a delight to see that post had been replied to so well
Originally posted by snafu7700
you guys are doing a fine job of spinning the conversation away from my original challenge:
Bush is backpeddling. It doesn't take rocket science to know what he and his cabinet were implying before.
Question: What did Iraq have to do with that?
THE PRESIDENT: What did Iraq have to do with what?
Question: The attack on the World Trade Center?
THE PRESIDENT: Nothing
"You can't distinguish between Al Qaeda and Saddam when you talk about the war on terror,"
President Bush-September 25, 2002
Bush administration quotes linking Iraq and al-Qaeda USA Today
2002
Rice, Sept. 25: "There clearly are contacts between al-Qaeda and Iraq that can be documented; there clearly is testimony that some of the contacts have been important contacts and that there's a relationship here. ... And there are some al-Qaeda personnel who found refuge in Baghdad."
Bush, Oct. 7: "We know that Iraq and the al-Qaeda terrorist network share a common enemy — the United States of America. We know that Iraq and al-Qaeda have had high-level contacts that go back a decade" and "we've learned that Iraq has trained al-Qaeda members in bomb-making and poisons and deadly gases."
2003
Bush, State of the Union address, Jan. 28: "And this Congress and the American people must recognize another threat. Evidence from intelligence sources, secret communications, and statements by people now in custody reveal that Saddam Hussein aids and protects terrorists, including members of al-Qaeda."
Bush, Feb. 6: "Senior members of Iraqi intelligence and al-Qaeda have met at least eight times since the early 1990s. Iraq has sent bomb-making and document forgery experts to work with al-Qaeda" and "Iraq has also provided al-Qaeda with chemical and biological weapons training."
2004
Cheney, Jan. 21: "I continue to believe — I think there's overwhelming evidence that there was a connection between al-Qaeda and the Iraqi government. I'm very confident that there was an established relationship there."
Cheney, Monday: Saddam Hussein "had long-established ties with al-Qaeda."
Bush Defends Assertions of Iraq-Al Qaeda Relationship 2004
"The reason I keep insisting that there was a relationship between Iraq and Saddam and al Qaeda: because there was a relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda," Bush said after a Cabinet meeting. As evidence, he cited Iraqi intelligence officers' meeting with bin Laden in Sudan. "There's numerous contacts between the two," Bush said.
“if we’re successful in Iraq…we will have struck a major blow right at the heart of the base, if you will, the geographical base of the terrorists who have had us under assault now for many years, but most especially on 9/11.” Dick Cheney
RUSSERT: The Washington Post asked the American people about Saddam Hussein, and this is what they said: 69 percent said he was involved in the September 11 attacks. Are you surprised by that?
CHENEY: No. I think it’s not surprising that people make that connection.
MR. RUSSERT: But is there a connection?
VICE PRES. CHENEY: We don’t know. Meet the Press
"I continue to believe. I think there's overwhelming evidence that there was a connection between al-Qaeda and the Iraqi government. We've discovered since documents indicating that a guy named Abdul Rahman Yasin, who was a part of the team that attacked the World Trade Center in '93, when he arrived back in Iraq was put on the payroll and provided a house, safe harbor and sanctuary. That's public information now. So Saddam Hussein had an established track record of providing safe harbor and sanctuary for terrorists. . . . I mean, this is a guy who was an advocate and a supporter of terrorism whenever it suited his purpose, and I'm very confident that there was an established relationship there." NPR
Originally posted by snafu7700
no, he spun your article for you. neither of you has yet to respond to my initial challenge:
show us a link to bush actually saying that saddam was responsible for 9/11.
Originally posted by snafu7700
that's what i love about you rainmaker.....you have absolutely no idea how to debate a topic without getting your poor little feelings hurt and making it personal. what are you, five? or is that just your IQ.....cant come up with a decent response, so we'll attempt to degrade the person instead and use big words to show how smart we are. grow up. .
Originally posted by snafu7700
subz: i understand what you are saying, but i still disagree. you were originally implying that bush made the literal connection between saddam and 9/11, which he never did. only after rainmaker ran to the rescue with his "implied connection" argument did you latch on to that idea.
Originally posted by subz
There you have it, from the horses mouth so to speak. Iraq had "nothing" to do with 9/11. It's kind of hard to spin such a succinct answer. President Bush also finds himself at odds with members of the US intelligence community as well as members of the British parliament who cite an increase in terror attacks globally following the Iraq invasion.
Originally posted by realanswers
To explain 9-11 is to explain WHY we would want to change anything in Irag. The United States has a major debt problem. The reasons the U.S. Dollar is still of good value is because the oil in the middle east uses the U.S. Dollar as the trading currency and the United States Dollar is also still supported by other major trading countries who still keep the Dollar of value by trading with us. Saddam Hussain chose to switch his country's oil trading currency from the Dollar to the Euro in early 2001. The Euro was and still is of higher value so it would help the country of Iraq on an economical basis. But, the United States found that direction of the oil countries switching from the Dollar to the Euro to be a direction that would lower the value of the Dollar so much that it could no longer compete with the rising of the value of the Euro. So, the United States secret government which rules over the visible government chose to hoax a terrorist attack that would receive enough approval from the world to go to war in a small country, so then later with an approved agenda and momentum, actually attack a country(Iraq) just to change the oil currency of trade back to the Dollar and keep control over much of the oil trade policies. You see the real reason that we need oil trading for a while to go. We don't have to because the U.S. does have free energy.