It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by soficrow
Well done subz.
Thank you. ...Another "Way Above" for you.
Ed to add: Sorry. ...Actually, I don't remember voting for anyone this month. Haven't been around much...
Originally posted by subz
So harbouring terrorist is a valid excuse for regime change? Great, where do I sign up to overthrow the Bush regime? The United States has harboured terrorists for decades.
Originally posted by missed_gear
In this period of time it would not be a far stretch for people to associate the belief.
Originally posted by missed_gear
You should read a bit closer next time…or at least keep an oriented perspective concerning the context of one's statements and/or replies to questions.
Originally posted by missed_gear
I fail to see where any of the remainder of your post is relevant to any of my comments about my reply to the question originally posed.
Originally posted by subz
If you noticed, I did not quote your entire post. That is because I was focusing on one aspect of the evidence provided and asking a seperate question based on the evidence you provided. It's not me that's missed the context of some ones post.
Originally posted by subz
You mentioned that Saddam was harbouring terrorists and I rhetorically asked whether that is a reason for regime change.
RUSSERT: The plane on the ground in Iraq used to train non-Iraqi hijackers.
Do you still believe there is no evidence that Iraq was involved in September 11?
CHENEY: Well, what we now have that's developed since you and I last talked, Tim, of course, was that report that's been pretty well confirmed, that he did go to Prague and he did meet with a senior official of the Iraqi intelligence service in Czechoslovakia last April, several months before the attack.
whitehouse.gov
Originally posted by subz
Oh please, you must be joking.
All we heard in the drum beat to invasion was speech after speech where Saddam and 9/11 were equated. Bush told us Saddam was linked to al-Qaeda and that he does not want the next 9/11 to be in the form of a mushroom cloud over NYC. Saddam - 9/11, Saddam - 9/11, Saddam - 9/11, Saddam - 9/11, Saddam - 9/11, that is all we heard and the very reason why over half of Americans thought he had a direct hand in the attacks.
I've heard many a time from the usual strident Bush supporters on this very website how Saddam was involved with 9/11.
As to "unethical"? Not by a long shot.
Originally posted by Regenmacher
Bush is backpeddling. It doesn't take rocket science to know what he and his cabinet were implying before.
Originally posted by snafu7700
backpeddling from what? his original statements made five years ago that saddam was not involved in 9/11, but was involved in general support of terrorism? again, this article has been spun worse than oreilly could ever dream of doing.
Gotta credible link? Thought not.
Also not that we went there to get an oil pipeline to go thru there and Iraq to get a good source of oil.
Originally posted by LAES YVAN
Most Americans are too busy working their butts off to live, since everything is so expensive (at least in California). People hardly have time to keep up with current affairs...
Originally posted by LAES YVAN
The MEDIA is horrible.
Originally posted by LAES YVAN
I wasn't going to say this earlier, but, oil had something to do with it to. Bush wants the oil money to go to the people of Iraq. Since Saddam was being selfish, and keeping most profits to himself.
Operation Iraqi Liberation
[edit on 26-8-2006 by LAES YVAN]
o.p. by notbuynit
Gotta credible link? Thought not.
According to Afghan, Iranian, and Turkish government sources, Hamid Karzai, the interim Prime Minister of Afghanistan, was a top adviser to the El Segundo, California-based UNOCAL Corporation which was negotiating with the Taliban to construct a Central Asia Gas (CentGas) pipeline from Turkmenistan through western Afghanistan to Pakistan.
When one peers beyond all of the rhetoric of the White House and Pentagon concerning the Taliban, a clear pattern emerges showing that construction of the trans-Afghan pipeline was a top priority of the Bush administration from the outset. Although UNOCAL claims it abandoned the pipeline project in December 1998, the series of meetings held between U.S., Pakistani, and Taliban officials after 1998, indicates the project was never off the table.
link
DO NOT DELETE-PLEASE PASS ON-Message from Iraq
The proud warriors of Baker Company wanted to do something to pay tribute To our fallen comrades. So since we are part of the only Marine Infantry Battalion left in Iraq the one way that we could think of doing that is By taking a picture of Baker Company saying the way we feel. It would be awesome if you could find a way to share this with our fellow countrymen. I was wondering if there was any way to get this into your papers to let the world know that "WE HAVE NOT FORGOTTEN" and are proud to serve our country." Semper Fi
1stSgt Dave Jobe
The attached photo was forwarded from one of the last U.S. Marine companies in Iraq. They would like to have it passed to as many people as possible, to let the folks back home know that they remember why they're there and that they remember those who've been lost.
Are you serious? You are, arent you?
Originally posted by LAES YVAN
I wasn't going to say this earlier, but, oil had something to do with it to. Bush wants the oil money to go to the people of Iraq. Since Saddam was being selfish, and keeping most profits to himself.
Operation Iraqi Liberation
[edit on 26-8-2006 by LAES YVAN]