Bush is crap,........

page: 2
2
<< 1   >>

log in

join

posted on Aug, 17 2006 @ 06:00 PM
link   
Yes I know marg I mentioned his denial at the end of my 2nd post.

He'll tow the official denial line though, if he wants to keep his job.

He said it off record and obviously wasn't expecting it to be made public, especially by one of his fellow party members.

Hes a blood and guts man turned champagne socialist and I think he remembers his roots every so often.

He made huge headlines over here when he was hit by an egg thrown by a protestor standing 3ft from him, he turned round and defended himself by smacking the protestor.....it was great.....only cos the protestor had a mullet though.......




posted on Aug, 17 2006 @ 06:08 PM
link   
Koka that tells you that politicians are like whores they have no souls.


When they tried to tell the truth they get screw.

Sometimes I wonder what Bush has on all these people that turn them into dodo when they talk about him.

I have to get to the conclusion that no politician has cojones anymore to tell the truth and stick with it.


Sorry I miss it on the second post. . . is Jake's fault



posted on Aug, 19 2006 @ 03:06 PM
link   
Bush is Crap?

Let us examine that for a moment.

Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary

"Main Entry: 2crap
Function: noun
Etymology: British dialect crap, craps residue from rendered fat, from Middle English crappe, perhaps from Old French crappe chaff, residue, from Medieval Latin crappa
1 a usually vulgar : FECES b usually vulgar : the act of defecating
2 sometimes vulgar : NONSENSE, RUBBISH; also : STUFF 4b"

Now my question is why would anyone take anyone else serious that resorts to this kind of language or analogy in referencing anyone else in any capacity?

Just like on here, when you read a post that was obviously made by someone with either deep seated prejudicial biases or lack of thought or intellect, you laugh, go on and ignore it for what it is. Our language is the only representation of who we are in many circumstances. This example is clear and succinct and needs to head off to "file 13."

Semper



posted on Aug, 19 2006 @ 04:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by semperfortis
Now my question is why would anyone take anyone else serious that resorts to this kind of language or analogy in referencing anyone else in any capacity?


Cos' its funny.....


....and the truth is the Bush administration is all those things that you quoted in your Webster definitions.



posted on Sep, 23 2006 @ 08:48 PM
link   
I dont think hes crap but I do think hes funny -------------------------------->

youtube.com...





new topics

top topics
 
2
<< 1   >>

log in

join