It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hogtiemissed_gear,
Originally posted by ZeddicusZulZorander
What hateful retoric? He doesn't like the UN? God forbid.
Originally posted by ZeddicusZulZorander
2) Behavior: You will not behave in an abusive and/or hateful manner, and will not harass, threaten, nor attack anyone.
There was no harrassing, threats, or attacks except at the poster. There was no abuse or hateful behavior. I don't actually see "hateful opinion" there myself.
Originally posted by subz
He's reveling in the deaths of 4 UN peace keepers. If some one posted the same about Israeli civilians dying im sure you'd think that crosses the line, no? How about reveling in the deaths of American civilians? Im sure any reasonable person would be right in seeing that as hateful rhetoric.
Originally posted by subz
By the way, are you still assuming that I said anything in the slightest that condoned the abuse he copped for what he said? If so please quote me.
Originally posted by ZeddicusZulZorander
Second, you are correct and I can certainly admit that you did not. If I made such an implication (since it was hours ago) then I also admit that would have been incorrect on my part.
Third, let's take this thread back on the topic.
Originally posted by wang
Well i cant see a good arguement on the side that it was a acciedent, at the moment the facts are looking towards a intentional attack but it can not be confirmed.
Originally posted by ZeddicusZulZorander
I haven't said a thing about the UN myself. It's the "facts" that I'm missing. We have some reports that it happened, there were communications between the UN and Israel, and that it was a precision missle.
We know it happened, but the intent hasn't been proven. There might have been communication issues, intelligence issues, and simple mapping/grid foul-ups. In an army those are a given, and with it being two armies (UN and Israel) the chances magnify.
Intent can only come with a complete investigation of the entire matter.
Originally posted by subz
If Hezbollah had set up shop right next to the UN observation post one would logically think the following:
a) Israel would protest loudly to the UN about such behaviour before launching an attack
b) The UN observation post would report the close proximity of Hezbollah militants and demand they withdraw
c) The reports state that Israel's fire progressively got nearer and nearer to the UN observation post. If Hezbollah was right next to the UN observation post why was the fire not instantly upon the UN observation post?
d) There are no reports that Israel informed the UN observation post of the proximity of Hezbollah militants to their location. If that was the case should it not of been reasonable to request the UNFIL troops evacuate their position prior to it being hit with a missile?
e) Why did Israel say the firing would cease on every conversation held between the UNFIL troops and the IDF? Why lie?
Originally posted by darksided
I don't think I have all the answers, but I will give a good try.
Originally posted by truthseeka
The terrorist Israelis could start bombing our forces (AGAIN) and their (paid?) worshippers here would still make excuses for them...:shk: