ATS 9/11 Conspiracy Survey Results, page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times


reply posted on 11-7-2006 @ 07:03 PM by bsbray11
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
The security company willingly allowed a demolition company for several weeks (because that's how long - if not longer - it would take to wire a building like the WTC) to come in and set explosive. All this went magically unnoticed. 5 years later, still not a peep from either companies.


I would really be surprised if any of the workers knew exactly what they were doing. There would be no point in telling them any unnecessary information, because it WOULD put the operation at risk.

Please, please tell me what these companies were that purposely killed thousands of Americans with no problem and why?


The same ones that are still killing thousands of people, albeit in other countries, and have no problem with it.

Are Americans that special, that when our civilians die, it's an unthinkable atrocity that you won't even entertain, when at the same time we've slaughtered and are still slaughtering many times more Arabs civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq and hardly anyone even mentions it?



That air, fire, and pressure want to get out, so they push whatever's in their way out of the way.

That doesn't mean you're not seeing charges go off. They do the same thing.
Those "ejections" [...] went in every direction known to man. It was a explosion.

Fine. I won't split hairs with you.
So...whatever detonated the thermite somehow survived the crash, explosion, and fires as well?

The blackboxes did, didn't they? And they had a front seat to the carnage. Technology is wonderful.
You still haven't explained why they lasted over an hour.

I just told you that you can put plasticizers in explosives like C4 to prevent it from being initiated in fires. Any hydrocarbon fires. Lasting however long. It doesn't matter. They won't go off.
On the impacted floors the fire and damage was significant enough for those floors to fail.

Evidence?
Why did they spend years of training and planning for this if the government was just going to do it anyway?

The US has trained/armed/funded terrorists in the past. You seem to think that, unless it was done overtly for someone to research and expose, it couldn't possibly have happened -- period. Well gee, you're right on their tails, man. The terrorists wouldn't have to know they were being set up, and maybe they weren't even Islamic extremists to begin with. There were reports after 9/11 in the major media (Newsweek, Washington Post, New York Times) that
some of the hijackers appear on records as having been trained on US bases.


reply posted on 12-7-2006 @ 06:49 PM by Infra_red
I always had it in the back of my mind from the time Bush won (stole) the presidency that he or his administration had something up their sleeves. I have to admit that Farenheit was also a catalyst for my mind to wonder but really got me was killtowns 200+. If the first one doesn't show you how far our gov't will go to meet an end then I don't know what will.
Being a statistic and subsequently disenfranchised myself from a young age, I can tell you first hand that what you see in the media and what the "officials" tell you are mostly light-years away from the truth. The problem is that most of the population will never learn this unless they witness it firsthand and are lucky enough to live to tell.


reply posted on 14-7-2006 @ 08:11 AM by the_gary
video.google.co.uk...

If you want to hear the relevant info, it's all in here if you haven't seen it yet. Pass it on to everyone you know, this seems to be the best unbiased accounts of facts.


reply posted on 2-9-2006 @ 02:50 AM by BlackGuardXIII
I don't believe the gov't was behind 911. The events of that day, though, stink to heaven. Compare the reaction when the private lear jet carrying 8 people, including Payne Stewart did not respond to repeated calls from air traffic control. From what I heard, 20 minutes after loss of contact, fighters were alongside the plane, as is standard operating procedure for protecting national airspace. The 4 large commercial airliners hijacked Sept 11th got nowhere near the same fast response. How could a jet get near the capitol? Andrews Airforce Base is charged with protecting that airspace. They had over an hour... what were they doing? It is quite widely agreed that numerous things that happened that day are odd. A coincidence? Could it be possible that, as is claimed regarding Pearl Harbour, the gov't needed public support before going to war, so they let it happen. The summer before 911, it is alleged that the countries around Afghanistan were quietly told that the US would be going into Afghanistan in October. In the Pearl Harbour claim, the mainland military leaders knew... and didn't pass it on to Hawaii. The public was not behind the war effort and something had to happen to swing public support around. The Pearl Harbour massacre sure did that. There are many aspects of the events of 911 that seem suspicious, like the fact that out of the 8 black boxes, 2 recorders per plane, designed to survive the tremendous forces of a crash, not one was able to be analyzed. None of them were usable. Many more anomalies surround that day... I have just named a few. If there were never any gov't cover ups found out I might not be so skeptical.... but....

Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 5 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 7 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 18 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 6 days ago with 49 member flags