Originally posted by bsbray11
Start with the ones BYU's Steven Jones is exploring in this paper.
I'm going to ignore the rest of your post for now...
As far as this...ugh...
I asked for theories with credible evidence to back it up. And haven't been debunked already
He (whoever) believes pre-positioned cutter-charges were also responsible for bringing down the towers. Why? Because it was hot and because of how
building 7 fell.
He doesn't go deeper though. If you believe they were pre-positioned tell me when and how they were put in place. Show me the CREDIBLE evidence (not,
I think I see this so they must have used this) that they used what you think they used. Show me how these explosives were able to survive the plane
crashing into them (as ever video shows, the towers collapsed at the points of impact), how they survived the resulting explosion and fires, and how
and why these magical explosives lasted over an hour untouched.
Nothing like this has EVER happened before in the history of the human race so please show me
credible evidence (meaning you've tested
everything) that buildings and surrouding buildings would not have reacted the way they did.
I'm also STILL waiting for someone with credible info to explain away the
terrorists...
Sure the official story has holes (what event in human history doesn't?), but I have yet to hear an unofficial explanation of 9/11 with less holes.
That's what I'm waiting for.