Propaganda and the power of 'The Simpsons', page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 7-7-2006 @ 03:31 AM by ConspiracyNut23
Delta Alter you make very good points.

It is obvious that the elite control all the medias. (including TV) It's debateble whether TV was created for this purpose or not, Nevertheless that is its purpose today.

The fact that it is distributed by FOX is very important. The FOX network has an agenda beyond corporate earnings. (see
OutFoxed.

The simpsons have a huge market share and is surely used for propaganda purposes. You would have to study each episode one by one and see, but it wouldn't surprise me to see a defenite right wing slant.

If we look at Homer's work situation we quiclky see that it has the typical union-busting theme so loved by our ruling elite, I'm sure Robert Murdoch doesn't dissagree with these kinds of themes.


reply posted on 7-7-2006 @ 10:33 AM by Delta Alter
Originally posted by Truthwillsetyoufree


But the Simpsons as a propaganda and people viewing them as role models for how to act in society, I say hogwash.

I believe that anybody watching television should have the ability to discern from it what they want, leave the fantasy on the screen and go about your everyday life as you normallywould do. But, for the people that can't handle it, disable the cable or throw your set out.


Hi Truthwillsetyoufree,

I don't believe ANYBODY in their right mind (or otherwise) would view these as role models. That is not the point I am trying to make.

This programme is on every day, endless episodes on an endless loop.
It is more of an indoctrination - "This is life, this is the Norm."

Think about it, does it not fit in with your neighbourhood? (or perceptions of it?)
Useless policing, respectless feral children, inept workers, ignorant, small minded residents, under-qualified teachers, constant crime, laziness, apathy, greed, selfishness, the list really does go on and on.

Don't get me wrong. I don't know whereabouts in the world that you live - but it seems to mirror life where I live - and depressingly so.

It is almost as if we have to resign to a certain lifestyle because 'That is just the way it is.' When in fact, it DOESN'T have to be like this - it's just they way 'they' want us to exist- Subservient to the system.

And once again - I don't doubt the satire and the wit. But it is a good way of getting us 'On Side.' ......"How can they be FOR it when they are taking the p#ss out of it??"


reply posted on 7-7-2006 @ 11:37 AM by Regensturm
If there's one film that I saw recently which was an attempt at conditioning, it was Team America.

I remember people saying when it came out "Oh you must see it! It's so funny! It makes fun of everything!"

I also remember the creators saying "we don't take a political stance"


Yeah.....right.

'Team America' was a Neocon wet dream about America being the saviours of the world, it showed anti-war people as being colloborators with dictators, and Paris being destroyed was deemed OK in the film, because 'we got the terrorist' in Paris at the same time, not withstanding the portrayal there was armed Al-Qaeda people in France (Against the Iraq War, hence they are evil cheese eating surrender monkeys who colloborate with terrorists.)

There was also a song which explained that in so many words that you may not like how America deals with the world's problems, but it's the best way. (RE: The song about dicks and assholes.)

Then there was linking Kim Il Sung to Al-Qaeda.

Conditioning us that they have links (As if) and conditioning us for war in the future.

It did not even attempt to be a film that was balanced paradosing comedy at all, it was a Right wing rant against those who are against the War On Terror, and war in general.


Basically it was saying "It's ok to be twerps and commit dirty deeds, as long as it's for the greater good. Get used to it"

The White House must have loved it. A conditioning of how things are, and demonising those who oppose.

It was a direct response to Fahrenheit 9/11. (Michael Moore portrayed as Evil traitor and suicide bomber, more demonisation.)

Exploiting pop culture to further PNAC aims.


reply posted on 7-7-2006 @ 04:07 PM by 2manyquestions
A few years ago I decided to quit watching TV for a couple of weeks. I was conducting a little experiment on myself,....just to satisfy my curiosity. I wanted to know if I'd miss it, if I could entertain myself without it and so forth.

It felt great. I re-discovered books among many other things. TV didn't seem to serve any valuable purpose, but I wasn't going to ignore some of the postivies either.

If you've been working hard all day, you want to get home, sit down on the sofa and relax. You want to take your mind away from the every-day problems, bills, whatever it is that bothers you. Some television shows are perfect for that. They help divert your mind, maybe help you laugh because you've had nothing else to laugh about all day. TV is effortless short-term entertainment, even more effortless than reading a book. All you have to do is just sit there and watch. It is perfect for the tired and lazy souls out there, and there's plenty of those in the world.
Television shows reflect the ideas of people,... and that includes all kinds of people with all kinds of ideas and beliefs. Some are quick to insert those ideas into the script, and others not so quick. Imagine yourself writing a script for a TV show. What would you write about? I bet that no matter how honest you were, someone out there would yell "PROPAGANDA!!". If we go by your logic, everything is propaganda, including your post here. You're trying to convince people that TV is bad. What if I were to believe that you're trying to convert me to your beliefs to serve your agenda (whatever it may be)? That's B.S. of course, but I'm just giving you an example.
Many years ago I read a book by Rene Descartes. He convinced me there's a possibility that there's no such thing as an actual physical world,... only our own thoughts projected out. While he may be right and his argument is convincing, I'm not going to go through life believing everything I see is a lie, or a figment of my imagination. Many or some TV shows 'might' contain propaganda, but I'm not going to stop watching the Simpsons only because they 'might' be indoctrinating me with their propaganda. I take it for what it is; 'Entertainment', not an Educational program.

I've watched countless episodes, and I continue enjoying the show. Sometimes they present views I don't agree with, and sometimes they present views I do agree with. I've seen them bash and praise both sides, and I've definitely heard them bash FOX on numerous occasions. You mentioned that Homer (for instance) is lazy, selfish, unaccomplished, etc. Well, I've seen episodes in which he became an inventor, an astronaut, a salesman. He's been portrayed as a caring husband and father, sometimes putting his own needs aside, etc. etc. At some tasks he failed, and he succeeded at others. Same with Marge. There is a lot of variety in that show, but I feel you focus only on the negative aspects of it to prove your point. After years of watching, I'm still ambitious. What's up with that? I certainly don't feel it is O.K. to lead a mediocre life, and there are countless College students and graduates who will feel the same as I do, even after years of watching the Simpsons.

I'm not arguying that TV doesn't dish out propaganda at any time, because many times it does,..... but it is up to the individual viewer to be smart enough to be able to discern one from the other. A lot of people here seem to be capable of such things, so why not give some benefit of doubt to the rest of the population? Maybe I'm an optimist, but I don't believe the individual is as dumb as you might think he/she is. Kids will always be impressionable, but eventually most grow out of it. Let's face it; If you're the kind of person who will completely change their beliefs just because some TV show told you to, you've got bigger problems.

I would be concered with the News (on any channel), but I'm only a little bit (if at all) worried about the shows. Even if you choose to quit watching TV, how will you get your world news? Newspapers? Word of mouth? The internet? I'm afraid you'll never know the truth unless you've experienced the events being reported. Even THEN you may not learn the true story of how it came about. The reporting of News is where you'll find the problem. There's no way to argue against any event being reported, unless you're there, and you know without a doubt they are reporting a blatant lie. How the heck am I supposed to know if 30 Chinese were wiped out by an explosion caused by a missile, unless I was there? For all I know they could be making it up, and creating convincing footage of the incident for me to 'witness'. So to end my rant,.... don't be too concerned with TV shows, be concerned with the News reports (any news reports). It is the News reports that shape our way of thinking,...including the thinking of TV series/movie script writers. The News (in my opinion) is the BIGGEST piece of propaganda you'll ever find anywhere in the world, I don't care what channel you're watching.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



A MUST Read, "Written By A Female Cop"
  Posted 2 days ago with 33 member flags
Know your enemy ... the Daily Mail & Viscount Rothermere
  Posted 11 days ago with 17 member flags
Pictures That Shocked The World (viewer discretion advised)
  Posted 0 days ago with 8 member flags
NBC and the Banned \'Fear Factor\' Episode
  Posted 8 days ago with 6 member flags