It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Warpspeed
In a way I feel sorry you have lost Australia as a long term friend, but that is just the way it is. As the motto here goes "deny ignorance". The truth is important, even if it is sometimes painful.
Originally posted by Knights
Warpspeed: Did you not read my post describing the various operation Austrailia was actively involved in?!
Ignorance means lack of understanding of a subject. If you are unwilling to even look over my findings and prove me wrong then I will bow down. Until then I think you are wasting everyones time by not even listening to others information.
[edit on 21-6-2006 by Knights]
Originally posted by deltaboy
Originally posted by Warpspeed
In a way I feel sorry you have lost Australia as a long term friend, but that is just the way it is. As the motto here goes "deny ignorance". The truth is important, even if it is sometimes painful.
Recent news tells me otherwise, Australia is still our friend.
[edit on 21-6-2006 by deltaboy]
Quoting senior military sources, the Daily Telegraph reported that Australia’s commitment to the invasion of Iraq would include Special Air Services (SAS) troops, F/A-18 Hornet fighters, P3C Orion maritime patrol aircraft, a Boeing 707 air-to-air refueling plane and three warships, including an amphibious command vessel. Some 20 Australian military officers are already stationed at the US Gulf headquarters in Qatar, where they are preparing to oversee the arrival of the Australian military contingent.
SAS troops, including a contingent of 150 that recently returned from Afghanistan, have been in intensive training for operations in Iraq. Their role, according to the newspaper, will be to destroy Iraqi mobile Scud missile launchers. The Hornets could be used in bombing raids in conjunction with US planes from Qatar and Kuwait, while the amphibious ship would function as a support “warehouse” and command ship for Australian military forces.
Originally posted by Knights
No this is the current war. Not desert storm. Please get your facts right.
Quoting senior military sources, the Daily Telegraph reported that Australia’s commitment to the invasion of Iraq would include Special Air Services (SAS) troops, F/A-18 Hornet fighters, P3C Orion maritime patrol aircraft, a Boeing 707 air-to-air refueling plane and three warships, including an amphibious command vessel. Some 20 Australian military officers are already stationed at the US Gulf headquarters in Qatar, where they are preparing to oversee the arrival of the Australian military contingent.
SAS troops, including a contingent of 150 that recently returned from Afghanistan, have been in intensive training for operations in Iraq. Their role, according to the newspaper, will be to destroy Iraqi mobile Scud missile launchers. The Hornets could be used in bombing raids in conjunction with US planes from Qatar and Kuwait, while the amphibious ship would function as a support “warehouse” and command ship for Australian military forces.
Another source backing up my claims written in 1999.
LINK
Condolences to the families. Its weird that the insurgents could have kept the soldiers alive to be used as a bargaining chip, or to show off their captives on tv and make the soldiers talk about how scare they are or something as they have showoff others like reporters and contractors who were kidnapped. But it seems to me the soldiers pretty much were not cooperative in their aims so they pretty much killed them and left their bodies
Originally posted by Warpspeed
Don't forget that all these war atrocities only began when the widespread torture of American prisoners at Abu Gharib became public. They then retaliated by publicly beheading some American prisoners.
Remember " Lindy" the female army driver that was captured ? She was very well treated by her captors. If America had stuck to the Geneva convention, none of this would be happening now.
America started all this torture business, so now Americans know exactly what to expect if captured.
Lindy who? You talking about Gulf War I or Gulf War II during hostilities? I know you aren’t talking about anytime since the war ended, because you would be wrong.
Earth to Warpspeed... this just in. Not a single American soldier who has been taken prisoner by terrorists has been returned alive. NOT 1. Every American soldier taken prisoner by terrorists has been killed. All of them.
It is sad that not only Americans, but many people in the world refuse to even acknowledge that reality, and attempt to form some sort of moral equivalence for who knows what reason between the way terrorists do things and Abu Gharib, or even better, Guantanamo Bay which by any possible measurement treats prisoners better than our enemy does.
Early in the war US prisoners were treated very well. Your statement that ALL American prisoners are executed is only true today.
If Jessica Lynch was captured today she would probably be raped, tortured and even beheaded. But only because of the barbaric actions of the US military in Iraq.
What goes around comes around.