It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Prot0n
Well that's all fine and dandy and all, that myth was written after the epic of gilgamesh, as I repeated before, there is an older text of which I can't remember the name that pre-dates the gilgamesh myth. The text your talking about was written after gilgamesh but prior to the biblical account. I saw this older text in a documentary a few months back. Just wish I could remember the name, would make searching for it easier as I'm sure your probably to smug to do so yourself.
Doesnt really help me too much. If something older than the Atrahasis is in existance, I would really love to see it, and would stand humbly corrected. Until then, I stand by the evidence provided.
I saw this older text in a documentary some months back
This story as we have it comes from an early Babylonian version of about 1700 BC, but it certainly dates back to Sumerian times. It combines familiar Sumerian motifs of the creation of mankind and the subsequent flood.
Originally posted by Prot0n
...1700BC is 18th century BC, not 19th. This is roughly around when the Atrahasis Epic was written, as per your link tell's us. Our earliest recorded Epic of Gilgamesh date's back to roughly 2100BC. That's a big difference compared to what your imagining. I'm unsure how someone who claims to have done such extensive research could overlook such an important detail as this. Exactly what does "extensive research" mean to you?
I'll repeat this one more time, probably won't be the last time considering what you view as "extensive research". I can't remember the name of the text, but it does predate the Gilgamesh account.
Originally posted by eagle eye
I always smile when i see ppl saying Noah was 500 years old. I dont say its BS but i think about how this pesky SOB was soo elusive from death, must have been a real badluck when he died. think about it after 500 years old you died you like oh # nuuuuuuuu.
King Jame Version
Genesis 9:
28And Noah lived after the flood three hundred and fifty years.
29And all the days of Noah were nine hundred and fifty years: and he died.
Originally posted by Harte
The Gilgamesh epic dates to the late Babylonian period. The story of Atrahasis comes from the early Babylonians. The even earlier story that (I think) Proton is referring to here is that of Ziusudra, an older than dirt Sumerian king. The story comes from an actual river flood that we absolutely know occurred in or around 2900 BCE
Originally posted by Prot0n
Hmm really.
You do leave me wondering if you had bothered to read the article you've linked too. 1700BC is 18th century BC, not 19th. This is roughly around when the Atrahasis Epic was written, as per your link tell's us. Our earliest recorded Epic of Gilgamesh date's back to roughly 2100BC. That's a big difference compared to what your imagining. I'm unsure how someone who claims to have done such extensive research could overlook such an important detail as this. Exactly what does "extensive research" mean to you?
I am trying to find it for you as obviously you need alot of help with this concept of extensive research of yours.
It's really a shame people are so smug these days
Originally posted by EdenKaia
Now, if we can get back to the subject at hand, I am still trying to figure out if we can deduce some sort of original story for the two myths to have been derived from. The evidence seems to point towards the idea that they were. Even other flood myths seem to have enough word for word comparisons to lend credence to this theory.
The children of Shem were Elam, Asshur, Aram, Arpachshad and Lud, in addition to daughters. In the New Testament, Luke lists the genealogy of Jesus from Adam through Shem, Abraham and David.
Shem was the progenitor of the south-western nations of Asia, being the father of Elam (Persia), Ashur (Assyria), Arpachshad or Arpachaxad (according to Josephus, Chaldea), from whom descended the Hebrews and Arabs, Lud (Lydia) and Aram (Syria).
Although both Jews and Arabic peoples derive their origins from Shem, the name Semitic is now almost exclusively used to refer to Jews.
Originally posted by EdenKaia
Now, if we can get back to the subject at hand, I am still trying to figure out if we can deduce some sort of original story for the two myths to have been derived from.
Originally posted by toolman
As was posted the phoenician language and alphabet preceeded the hebrew. Phoenicians were seafarers, traders than knew the currents and winds and made their fortunes based on this.
So, they travel from port to port spreading trade and gossip, stories of creation, floods, and beliefs.
Its no wonder so many cultures of that era share stories, myths, and beliefs.
At my website, www.bibleorigins.net I have posted a photo of this craft illustrating the pre-biblical origins of the Noah's Flood story
Perhaps the word kur was misunderstood?
In the Biblical Noah's arc, a single ominipotent and omniscient god, punishes the world for violating his absolute moral law. While in the Sumerian version, a flood is caused by one (or more) of the gods in the pantheon for some capricious reason.