Noah vs. Utnapishtim (Bible and Gilgamesh)

reply to post by huckfinn


Sorry. Cant Digest That.

The Ubaid was just a Period of the Sumerian Civilisation, Not a Civilization/Culture unto itself.

There is No records of the Phoenicians being the same as the Sumer (or to a lesser extent the Ubaid). Nothing.

Its you alone who have twiseted whats written in wikipedia to provide a correlation that you have wroked up in your mind.
Your Histroy is wanting, bro.

reply to post by coredrill


Well, you should find comfort in that. Cheers.

Harte..doesnt this Chap Huckfinn remind us of Good Ol' Orion Von Koch??

reply to post by coredrill


Howdy Coredrill

The concensus seems to be that the Ubaidians were a separate culture that ran from around 7,000 BP to 6,000 BP. It seemed to have covered most of mesopotamia, Eastern Arabia and parts of Oman. There culture replaced the Halaf. They were related to the Samarra who were in northern Iraq. They in themselves were taken over/incorporated into the Sumerian culture. There language was different from the later Sumerian. I would deem them a separate culture.

this is something iv been studying a log time i think the bible is a book of secrets but also a book of ansers and you are correct it dose not say how long it took to make the ark but its like a puzzle that needs to be put together however there is also other stuff like hammurabi and a god passing him the laves or better nown as the code of hammurabi that is like god giveing moses the 10 commandments on mount siani so send a message back and maybe we can put the puzzle together