It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Baphomet79
The problem is the potential for diaster, unfortunately their is just so much risk with a nuclear powered Space Shuttle. Another Colombia or Challenger would be exponentially worse with a nuclear powered shuttle.
Originally posted by Baphomet79
The problem is the potential for diaster, unfortunately their is just so much risk with a nuclear powered Space Shuttle. Another Colombia or Challenger would be exponentially worse with a nuclear powered shuttle.
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
Project Orion, if I recall correctly, was launched by detonating nuclear bombs under it. Newer concepts arn't as volitile.
Originally posted by Low Orbit
When I started this thread I meant for it to be both about nuclear and antimatter or any other technologically superior engine than a rocket.
Koji personally I don't think aliens would mind us flying around on nukes(ride at your own risk they might say to us) or anti-matter anti-gravity devices. I would never think of arming these aircraft since they would be run by nasa. If they want to put some .50 cals on it it's none of my business though, jk. I think they would see it for what it was, an extremely brave attempt into the unkown in a search for further scientific and spiritual truth.
If you are still unsure that it would be safe for us to take a nuclear powered space shuttle into space nasa could design it to look exactly like your avatar, jk
The main point I am trying to make is we(American Citizens and NASA) have other options than traditional rockets to use for our new shuttle. Why don't we take this as an opportunity to illustrate to the world that w can make interstellar space travel safe, fast, and efficient?
Originally posted by Hellmutt
I suspect the reason is the same as why there are no nuclear bomber planes flying around up there non-stop. The risk of disaster plus it would be too heavy. Maybe the reactor itself would not be too heavy for the shuttle (I don't know) but the shielding certainly would be. You'd need to protect the crew from radiation.
My 2 cents...
Originally posted by Low Orbit
Koji are you telling me propulsion technology hasn't changed much in the last 40 years?
Originally posted by AHCivilE
IMO, It really is only the stresses caused by re-entry that stop us. So, if this were a vehicle permantly stationed in orbit, it would be safe enough. We could design a safe enough containment device for launch and a possible break up there, but a reentry break up would call for excessive shielding that would weigh way to much. NASA's New Horizons program uses a form of nuclear power....
New Horizons
[edit on 30-4-2006 by AHCivilE]
Originally posted by Low Orbit
Koji, besides rockets what form of propulsion are you advocating for Nasa to investigate in the future?