It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by planeman
With the best will in the world, jet engines kick out a lot of hot air out the tail end.
In many low-observable designs an attempt to reduce the intensity of this is made by:
1. Not using afterburners (yes the F-22 follows this concept)
2. Having a long narrow exhaust to even out exhaust and reduce “hot spot”, usually with an elongated jet pipe.
3. Mixing the exhaust with cold air before it exits the aircraft.
4. Masking by tail etc.
But the F-22 and F-35 do not do #2 and probably not #3. Both of those features reduce the thrust which is negative to performance.
The square exhausts and worse round exhaust of the F-35 is likely to produce a hot spot much like conventional fighters. And that is before airframe heating.
How susceptible to IR/visual detection are these jets?
Uh the F/A 22 is designed to avoid detection by radar i don't know what you're talking about. Besides that's a pic of the F/A 22 in full afterburner the flames aren't that big.
Given that they are already quite vulnerable to radar detection I suppose IR would be a fine supplemental tool.
Originally posted by urmomma158
Uh the F/A 22 is designed to avoid detection by radar i don't know what you're talking about. Besides that's a pic of the F/A 22 in full afterburner the flames aren't that big.
Given that they are already quite vulnerable to radar detection I suppose IR would be a fine supplemental tool.
that's not what i was referring to(size of the flame) the pic that's provided is the Raptor in afterburning mode. Why do you think they're susceptible to raar detection????
You wouldn't know what I am talking about and that's not your fault. As for the flames, it's not the size that counts, its how you use it.
The Raptor can go mach 1.7
what ? again the fantastic M1.7??, lol
"The only part that is vulnerable is the back"
lol actually the back is the only vulnerable IR part of all planes, but still can be detected from all angles
"Not ironic, just sad."
not sad, the problem is that ppl love to overrate some things, the f22 wasnt designed to be stealth, even a blind man can see that, but mostly to increase the effectiveness of their counter measures
Link
One tactic for the F-22s will be to approach a wave of cruise missiles head-on, get in a first shot and then turn at Mach 1.7 supercruise speed for a second and third shot from behind.
Originally posted by grunt2
that 1.7 number was in a test and ppl take as nominal, also dont explain if is the pre production-post production plane, the service raptor have a nominal supercruiser of M1.4, was decreased from the nominal close to 1.6M of the YF, thats coz the increase of aspect in the wing -increasing the drag- (by supossely the lack of subsonic maneoverability)
anyway that was already discussed, if you thing that the nominal speed will be increased increasing the wing aspect , you have the right to believe whatever stuff....
[edit on 8-5-2006 by grunt2]
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Don't be too sure, maybe for current stealth technology. Like I told you in another post, when radar tech was getting very precise at tracking normal aircraft stealth technology was developed. If stealth becomes obsolete then naturally a new technology will emerge. However currently the F-22 still gets the job done.
And you're assuming stealth aircraft will always fly at the same altitude. The next batch will fly at extremely high altitudes and very high speeds. You're assuming tech advances on one side.
here is not an aircraft design in the world that can hide its wake - especially low aspect ratio fighter designs.
If the radar is not tracking the aircraft, but the aircraft's wake - there is pretty much nothing you can do.
Unless you'd like a U2 as a A2A combat aircraft?
Originally posted by urmomma158
And you're assuming stealth aircraft will always fly at the same altitude. The next batch will fly at extremely high altitudes and very high speeds. You're assuming tech advances on one side.
Originally posted by urmomma158
^^^^ Who say's it won't obey the laws of physics. I was simply stating that as radars get better at detecting wakes planes will minimize wakes by flying at higher and higher altitudes. Not to mention there will also be hypersonic planes.
[edit on 12-5-2006 by urmomma158]
Originally posted by kilcoo316
They already fly at massive altitude. F-22 runs around at 50,000 ft