It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Independant
An RAF doctor on trial for refusing to serve in Iraq told a court martial yesterday that he refused to go because the war was against "international law, the Nuremberg principles and the rules of armed conflict".
Flight Lieutenant Malcolm Kendall-Smith, the first member of the armed forces to be charged with disobeying orders to deploy in Iraq, said he had come to his decision after researching the legal advice given to Tony Blair by the Attorney General, Lord Goldsmith.
The officer, who has dual British and New Zealand nationality, told the hearing that he had "two great loves in my life, medicine and the Royal Air Force. To take the decision that I have saddens me greatly but I feel that I have no other choice."
His words:
"I believe the occupation of Iraq is illegal... and for me to comply... would put me in conflict with both domestic and international law. The illegality of the use of force against Iraq was the only reason I could not follow this order... [and] was the only reason for my resignation.
I would, in fact, refuse the orders as a duty under international law, the Nuremburg principles and the law of armed conflict...
I was subjected, as was the entire population, to propaganda depicting force against Iraq to be lawful but it was not until the middle of 2004 that I researched and found that not to be the case."
An RAF doctor who refused to serve in Iraq has been sentenced to eight months in jail and dismissed from the service.
Flt Lt Malcolm Kendall-Smith, 37, was found guilty of five charges of disobeying orders after he refused to go to Basra last June.
He claimed his actions were justified as the UK involvement was illegal.
But a court martial panel agreed with prosecution lawyers that the doctor, based at RAF Kinloss in Scotland, could not "pick and choose" orders he obeyed.
Originally posted by Knights
IMO he deserved every single year given to him! He's a doctor.. paid to help OUR troops and possibly civilians or normal Iraqis.. I'm quite glad he has been sentanced!
Originally posted by Souljah
Originally posted by Knights
IMO he deserved every single year given to him! He's a doctor.. paid to help OUR troops and possibly civilians or normal Iraqis.. I'm quite glad he has been sentanced!
And apparently he is also a man who thinks with his own head and a man with a lot of balls to say that Iraqi "Liberation" is against "international law, the Nuremberg principles and the rules of armed conflict".
And he is RIGHT.
Originally posted by Souljah
And apparently he is also a man who thinks with his own head and a man with a lot of balls to say that Iraqi "Liberation" is against "international law, the Nuremberg principles and the rules of armed conflict".
And he is RIGHT.
Im sorry Sir i cant go to iraq, Saving a fellow soldiers life goes against what i believe in
Originally posted by deltaboy
Since when do soldiers become picky when picking which war to fight? The military was not meant for you to go overseas and just enjoy the world.