Originally posted by AryanDan
Look Nygdan, you clearly believe the stereotypical view of Aryan history as told by the victors of WWII.
I accept what the evidence supports, so long as the evidence supports it.
If you do not want to be enlightened on the subject
You have not demonstrated that you are enlightened.
They suddenly appeared on Earth with no explanation from traditional archaeologist.
This is rather the opposite of what the evidence and records show.
They were extremely advanced. They rode chariots and traveled the whole globe more so than any other race
It is somewhat difficult to determine exactly what aryan theory you are advocating, it seems to be a mix of the 'whites are gods' and the 'storming
aryan hordes out of central asia' ideas. The first is a religion, based on faith, the other is a once accepted, but now, because of the evidence,
rejected, theory of history.
(Nygdan, if you don't like the word 'race' then what word do you use?).
Klangimorphitypolon.
Aryans have been found in China, Japan, Thailand,
What are you basing this upon? Red headed mummies in china? Why do you think one must be an aryan to have reddish hair? Hair colour is based upon
the density of
one pigment in the hair. Blonde to jet black, it is nothing more than a grading scale of concentration of a single pigment.
both Americas (in fact, the oldest human bones ever found in America were of White people (early Aryans!).
Kensington man has not been established as being a european.
The story in the bible about the Tower of Babel was real.
The very idea is nonsense. Languages do not spread out from babylon, linguistic groups are clearly older than that civilization.
Because of this, it is unclear just exactly what the original language was, but it most likely was a version of Vedic from which Sanskrit came. And,
yes, both were Aryan. And by Aryan, I mean the those White people created by the Aryan Gods. It's really not that difficult to follow.
Actually it is, since the word aryan has meant different things through time. Amoung the nazis, it mean 'white dudes'. Amoung archaeolgists and
anthropologists, it meant a theoretical tribe that spread from somehwere in central asia into india, iran, europe, the caucus, etc. Amoung the
Indians, from whom the word actually comes from, it means 'noble', and the root of the word seems to be contained in the modern term Iranian. Do
you think Iranians are Aryans? Afghans? Armenians? Turcomen too perhaps? Which? The term can be applied in many different ways. You
seem
to be saying that Aryans are a group that resembles modern northern europeans. Why?
If you believe the traditional archaeological view (and it's only a view)
As opposed to what exactly? Thats all we have to go on, evidence and theories about that evidence. The theories that best explain the evidence are
the ones we should rationally accept. The ones that don't explain the evidence as well, or that are based on beleif, those are 'irrational'.
Accept them if you please.
the Aryans (this is not a matter of opinion either, the Aryans are universally desired by more races than any other race
No such study has ever been done. I don't know where you are getting this idea. People want to bang hot white chicks. People also want to bang hot
asian chicks and hot black chicks.
; in other words, no other race is desired by as many different races as the Aryans).
This is a good example of why the term 'race' is useless. 'White' people look extremely different, they are very variable. Not everyone in the
world like, for example, greek chicks. Its hardly true that all swedish chicks are hot. What happens when a non-white doesn't like a particular
white chick, does that mean that that race does or does not like whites? How many individuals have to reject how many white chicks before that
'race' no longer likes whites???
Of course, the word "mutated" is a loaded word purposely meant to be a derogatory why to explain "where did 'whitey' come from"?
Thats incorrect. Mutations are a scientific term. A mutation is simply an allele that is different or new.
If you are going to believe such a concept, then you might correct those who use the word "mutated" and tell them to replace it with
"evolved".
Ok. Are you actually saying that no one claims that white populations evolved out of darker ones???
Then, I guess, this colony of advanced 'evolved', formally black Africans, now white Aryans,
Just because one population has evolvlved from another one doesn't mean that its more advanced, or even that its a different species or anything like
that.
I think that you have a fundamental misunderstanding of biology, archaeology, linguistics, and history here. You are postulating that these entities,
races, which have no biological reality, no mechanisms that maintain them and no definitions that determine them, are magically made by super-beings,
plopped down on teh planet, and then, because they, what, they ride around on platforms towed by ponies, are a threat to the super-gods??
And that they spoke 'aryan', but the languages were 'confused', but they still spoke aryan? Your times don't make any sense here either. It'd
help if there was genetic evidence showing that, say, north indians are more closely related to, say, scandanavians that to , say, south indians, but
unfortunately for this idea, they arent', and rather the opposite is true.
Anyway, defining 'white' would be a nice start. Is it a specific range of melanin concentration in the epidermis? Does it encompass greeks and
lithuanians?
