It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by iamjman
Also,(NIST, 2005; p. 179)
The initial jet fuel fires themselves lasted at most a few minutes
and yet... NIST also reported that pockets of fire hit 1832°F. This is because their computer models showed that the fire would have had to have been this hot to just initiate a collapse.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Is an asinine statement because there is no precedent for buildings globally collapsing like the WTC Towers did. Saying what is likely or unlikely here is based on absolutely nothing but personal opinion.
Originally posted by truthseeka
Man, please.
You've been running your mouth all through this thread talking about planes hitting buildings. Do you deny this?
This means that the towers were just fine after the plane hit, and they could tell that this was so because of the building's oscillations. Longer periods would mean a less stable tower, but this was not the case.
Originally posted by BigTrain
Heres a hint to help you, buildings are 95% air, they are not cross-sectioanlly stiff solid like a tree, so why would you expect the tops to topple over like a tree being cut down. Do you know why those trees tip over compared to why the towers smashed there way through themselves?
Heres another hint, stop saying collapsed onto themselves, because this is an utter lie. We all know the debris was scattered for many square city blocks.
Originally posted by BigTrain
For you people to think that the NIST report was staged is just pure laughable. If it was, youd have ACI, ASCE, ASI and many other engineering societies calling them out. We take our professions very seriously, and if our major organizations didnt feel that the report was correct, youd hear about it no doubts. The major problem you conspiracy buffs have is that you have no background in this topic and your theories are dismissed instantly because the errors in your reasonings are beyond response. First have a clue before you start using descriptions such as"Defying the laws of Physics".
Heres a hint to help you, buildings are 95% air, they are not cross-sectioanlly stiff solid like a tree, so why would you expect the tops to topple over like a tree being cut down. Do you know why those trees tip over compared to why the towers smashed there way through themselves?
Heres another hint, stop saying collapsed onto themselves, because this is an utter lie. We all know the debris was scattered for many square city blocks.
We would enjoy your debate much more if you didnt supply pure lies and try to spin them to make it fit the bill. If there is substantial evidence contrary to NIST that doesnt border on insanity, then present it, otherwise, you wont get any meaningful people to listen to you.
Trying to help here, not be a d*ck.
Train
Originally posted by BigTrain
For you people to think that the NIST report was staged is just pure laughable.
Heres a hint to help you, buildings are 95% air
they are not cross-sectioanlly stiff solid like a tree, so why would you expect the tops to topple over like a tree being cut down.
Heres another hint, stop saying collapsed onto themselves, because this is an utter lie. We all know the debris was scattered for many square city blocks.
And to fall straight down does not automatically ensure a global collapse, especially when you only have 13 floors falling on 97 more
The core was designed to support the entire weight of the buildings several times over. Far more than a mere "service core", it comprised of 47 steel box columns tied together at each floor by steel plates, similar to the 52" deep spandrel plates that tied the perimeter columns together. The largest of these core columns were 18"x36", with steel walls 4" thick near the base and tapering in thickness toward the top, and was anchored directly to the bedrock.
The "truss theory" is implausible. It is a fantasy concocted to conceal a demolition.
If it's just the floors that collapsed, then what happened to the inner core? Should that not have stayed standing while the floors fell around it?
Originally posted by Skibum
Upper floors initially hit floor below, floor gives way and travels with the rest of the debris downwards destroying the rest of the floors which removes alot of the stability of what would be remaining. We cannot forget that the initial chunk that fell was over 100 feet tall so, after the inital lower surface of the 100 foot tall piece of debris clears the floor we still have a 100 foot+ section of building following that initial impacting surface to "bat clean up". Once the floors are gone the remaining structure is nowhere near as stable.
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by BigTrain
Heres a hint to help you, buildings are 95% air, they are not cross-sectioanlly stiff solid like a tree, so why would you expect the tops to topple over like a tree being cut down. Do you know why those trees tip over compared to why the towers smashed there way through themselves?
Heres another hint, stop saying collapsed onto themselves, because this is an utter lie. We all know the debris was scattered for many square city blocks.
I just love ppl who claim others know nothing when in fact they appear to know nothing themselvs.
You only have to look at other building collapses to know you first point is so wrong.
If you were to cut out 95% of the tree leaving a center core and an outside frame it still would not collapse down on itself if you cut a section out near the top.
Look at the Oklahoma Federal Building for a good example of how building collapse when only damaged on on side. It falls neither like a tree or like a demoed building.
And no the debris did not scatter for many city blocks.
WTC 7...no comment needed.
Do you see the difference?
What do we actually know about WTC building 7? We know that it was not hit by any planes, yet it collapsed several hours after the two towers fell. What else is there that is known about building 7 that may shed some light on how and why it fell?