It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
Shots
Will you please provide some documentation that automatic weapons are used by US criminals to such an extent as to warrant SWAT teams.
Originally posted by shots
just turn on Cops on TV to see how many criminals are armed with automatic weapons.
Originally posted by shots
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
Shots
Will you please provide some documentation that automatic weapons are used by US criminals to such an extent as to warrant SWAT teams.
Senator Feinstein Urges Renewal of Assault Weapons Ban, Passage of Anti-Gang Legislation to Protect Cops & Communities
Growing gang war has devastated parts of Rio de Janeiro
Rise and rise of Dublin's vicious drug lords
Drug wars shatter hopes in Brazil slum
California Central District Drug Threat Assessment
Here is another 3 Million Plus examples
Now if those are still not enough for you, then just turn on Cops on TV to see how many criminals are armed with automatic weapons.
The above are sufficient enough reasons to convince me and I would think given your age, you too would agree.
Edit to add one in your own general area where they use automatic weapons daily.
US Customs Today
[edit on 3/22/2006 by shots]
Theres other ways to serve warrants, then destroying a house is all Im saying.
Originally posted by stumason
Anyhoo, from the logic you seem to follow, rather than banning the Automatic weapons (which are completely uneccessary for ANY civilian to have) you advocate the increased militarization of the Police force AND the increased use of said Military style police units.
Escalating something only makes it worse. If all the cops have body armour and automatic assault weapons, then the criminals are only going to tool up to match them.
Originally posted by esdad71
Ever think that maybe crime is up? Ever notice how many times on the news now you hear about some moron locked in a house with a hostage or himself and 3 guns?
Try to find a comparison of how many less police officers are killed each year in comparison to previous years when SWAT may not have been involved as much. If it saves lives, then it is worth it.
dgtempe, do you have a link or know what city that occured in?
Originally posted by jsobecky
Too bad the inverse is not true. Criminals won't reduce their firepower to match an unarmed police force. If there is a weapon on the market, they will have it, legal or not.
Originally posted by dgtempe
I guess we better be careful where we go, who we see, what we do. It could be any one of us with a bullet in our heads.
Just before i left Arizona, a woman tried to pass off a bad prescription, and the cops promptly shot her and killed her.
Why bother with the judicial system anymore? Normally, this woman would have gone to jail, had a hearing , gone to jail. They took her life away in a second.
:shk: Its a darn shame.
Originally posted by shots
Originally posted by jsobecky
Too bad the inverse is not true. Criminals won't reduce their firepower to match an unarmed police force. If there is a weapon on the market, they will have it, legal or not.
Isn't that the real truth.
What you said reminds me of the phrase "When guns are outlawed only outlaws will have them".
What I would like to see is a ban of the sale of all automatic weapons but that will never happen thanks to the NRA. No I am not against the NRA.
I just think their logic with regard to automatic weapons suck.
Originally posted by LazarusTheLong
Spliff said it best... it is about jobs for gun happy idiots that would be hard core unemployables otherwise (interviewer "it says here that you like to shoot, kill, and break doors, sorry, no jobs call for that skill)
From my familiarity with Police, they are rather gun happy... I can only think SWAT are more so...
Originally posted by GrndLkNatv
Remember one thing, Criminals and Cops all have the same low IQ, just on opposite sides of the law...
Originally posted by JBurns
You failed to mention this woman's abrupt movements also. If this is the same story I'm thinking of, DG.