It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by soficrow
Why do authorities always charge thinkers and whistleblowers with "fear-mongering"?
Radiation levels up to 1,000 times higher than a high dose rate were found a day after the trailer and its 2.6-tonne package reached their destination.
Originally posted by loam
What? The article explicitly says:
Radiation levels up to 1,000 times higher than a high dose rate were found a day after the trailer and its 2.6-tonne package reached their destination.
It obviously "hung out", as you put it, for 24 hours.
Originally posted by Tanin
Kinda quick on the rolleye smiley aren't we?
Yet another misleading statement in the article. You will notice it did not state where the measurement was taken. Since I don't think that the laws of physics were miraculously altered around the area in question, the only logical explanation would be that the impressive-sounding-but-meaningless "1000 times higher than high dose rate" was measured in the proximity of the storage container the day after--not along the road. Gamma particles are a form of EM energy and behave as EM energy, period.
This article is full of misdirection; whether by ignorance or intent (fear mongering), only the author knows. This kind of garbage is put out all the time and only causes the public to get more confused about topics that really aren't that difficult to understand.
Originally posted by loam
I'm quoting your entire post, because after doing additional research, I can't disagree with a single thing you said.
I also now better understand Howard's response as well...
Good job making that aspect of the story more clear....really.
I'm still not comforted, however, by the remaining facts of that story. Are you?
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Gamma radiation is a form of electromagnetic energy. I.e. it is like light.
I am assuming form that article that none of the Co-60 escaped the cask, then the following statement:
Radiation levels up to 1,000 times higher than a high dose rate were found a day after the trailer and its 2.6-tonne package reached their destination.
while factually correct, is clearly designed to elicit a fear response along the lines of:
"Oh, my god, it is still high coming out of the cask a day later!"
Well Duh.
Fortunately, the narrowly focused beam was directed downwards. Had the rays escaped horizontally, they would have contaminated anyone within 330 yards of the vehicle.