It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jsobecky
It does't mention anything about a warrant.
Law Enforcement. Most state laws have specific provisions on wiretapping and eavesdropping by law enforcement officials. They can tap into a telephone where there is "probable cause" to believe unlawful activity is being conducted by obtaining a court order. Unlawful activity must involve specified felonies, such as murder, solicitation to commit murder, kidnapping, offenses involving bombings, and conspiracy to commit any of these crimes. The court order must limit the surveillance to communications related to the unlawful activity and to a specific amount of time, usually 30 days.
There are two sources of authority for wiretapping in the US.
(1) The Federal Wiretap Act, sometimes referred to as Title III, was adopted in 1968 and expanded in 1986. It sets procedures for court authorization of real-time surveillance of all kinds of electronic communications, including voice, e-mail, fax, and Internet, in criminal investigations. It normally requires, before a wiretap can commence, a court order issued by a judge who must conclude, based on an affidavit submitted by the government, that there is probable cause to believe that a crime has been, is being, or is about to be committed. Terrorist bombings, hijackings and other violent activities are crimes for which wiretaps can be ordered. (The PATRIOT Act expanded the list of criminal statutes for which wiretaps can be ordered.) This authority is used to prevent as well as punish crimes: government can wiretap in advance of a crime being carried out, where the wiretap is used to identify planning and conspiratorial activities. Judges almost never deny government requests for wiretap orders.
(2) The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 allows wiretapping of aliens and citizens in the US based on a finding of probable cause to believe that the target is a member of a foreign terrorist group or an agent of a foreign power. For US citizens and permanent resident aliens, there must also be probable cause to believe that the person is engaged in activities that "may" involve a criminal violation.
Both Title III and FISA allow the government to carry out wiretaps without a court order in emergency situations involving risk of death or serious bodily injury and in national security cases.
originally posted by BenevolentHeretic
As far as I know there is NO indication that the eavesdropping program has contributed at all to keeping us secure.
We already know FISA impeded intelligence gathering before 9/11. It was the reason FBI agents decided not to tap the computer of alleged 20th hijacker Zacarias Moussaoui. And it contributed to the NSA's decision not to listen to foreign calls to actual hijacker Khalid al-Midhar, despite knowing that an al Qaeda associate by that name was in the country. The NSA feared being accused of "domestic spying."
FISA
Originally posted by Jehosephat
we know Bush is a lying hypocrite, Bush created the Executive order back in 2001 allowing NSA to wire-tap, specifically circumventing the FISA law.
Originally posted by jsobecky
originally posted by BenevolentHeretic
As far as I know there is NO indication that the eavesdropping program has contributed at all to keeping us secure.
No, but we do know that not using it has hurt us:
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
D - I'm convinced the gov't had foreknowledge of 9/11 and just let it happen.
Private communications take place where one may reasonably expect to be safe from casual or hostile intrusion or surveillance, but such term does not include a place to which the public or a substantial group of the public has access. A person commits the crime of criminal eavesdropping if he intentionally uses any device to eavesdrop, whether or not he is present at the time.
Originally posted by Astronomer68
I keep telling everyone that what the NSA is doing is not wiretapping and it is not illegal.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Do you trust your government and the NSA, every single person who would have access to this program NOT to abuse it?
Originally posted by Majic
I can understand discussing the “Republican revolt” in this thread, but I don't see the point of repeating a discussion which has already taken place, and I don't intend to repost what I have already posted extensively there.
Of course, members can post whatever they want, but if I wanted to hear regurgitations of political talking points, I'd listen to talk radio instead.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Then perhaps you'd better turn it on.
Originally posted by Astronomer68
BH it has been pretty well established in the past that transmitting over a radio is akin to speaking in a public place.
Originally posted by Majic
Call me when you reach consensus on what the truth is in this case.
Originally posted by Astronomer68
If NSA is doing that BH I haven't read about it yet. However, if they are actually tapping land lines to listen to telephone calls then they are violating the law.
President Bush has secretly authorized the NSA to monitor and eavesdrop on large volumes of telephone calls
...
The NSA is now tapping into the heart of the nation's telephone network through direct access to key telecommunications switches that carry many of America's daily phone calls
...
It is difficult to know the precise size of the NSA operation, but one indication of its large scale is the fact that administration officials say that one reason they decided not to seek court-approved search warrants for the NSA operation was that the volume of telephone calls and e-mails being monitored was so big that it would be impossible to get speedy court approval for all of them.
...
Today, industry experts estimate that approximately 9 trillion e-mails are sent in the United States each year. Americans make nearly a billion cell phone calls and well over a billion land line calls each day.
Following President Bush's order, U.S. intelligence officials secretly arranged with top officials of major telecommunications companies to gain access to large telecommunications switches carrying the bulk of America's phone calls.
...
Unknown to most Americans, the NSA has extremely close relationships with both the telecommunications and computer industries, according to several government officials.
...
In the Program, the NSA determines, on its own, which telephone numbers and e-mail addresses to monitor. The NSA doesn't have to get approval from the White House, the Justice Department, or anyone else in the Bush administration before it begins eavesdropping on a specific phone line inside the United States.
Officials with some of the nation's leading telecommunications companies have said they gave the NSA access to their switches, the hubs through which enormous volumes of phone and e-mail traffic pass every day, to aid the agency's effort to determine exactly whom suspected Qaeda figures were calling in the United States and abroad and who else was calling those numbers. The NSA used the intercepts to construct webs of potentially interrelated persons. (The Times, citing FBI sources, reported that most of these tips led to dead ends or to innocent Americans.)
Analyzing large amounts of telecom traffic would give security officials valuable information about potential adversaries, revealing the times of day that terrorist suspects tended to conduct their communications, and the means they used -- land-line phones, mobile phones, or the Internet -- according to telecommunications experts.