|
reply posted on 1-4-2006 @ 09:34 AM by Prince Bernhard
|
The "List" that is bandied about is ambiguous at best anyways.
What do you think the source of the "List" is and given the potential sources, what motivation is there for the sources to give a real list or have
some rather glaring ommissions?
A rather glaring circular conundrum.
Perhap my years in Leiden make me rather more doubtful of these matters...
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-4-2006 @ 03:35 PM by Eva
|
Many ways to look at it, I would say.
Either:
1. This list is the real deal
2. Someone wants to make us THINK this list is the real deal
3. It’s accurate, but strange enough that someone wants us to believe it’s been ‘adjusted’ so as to send people off on a wild goose chase
where none exists
or
4. It’s completely off, but a good list to put out there for speculation whilst the real players are hidden in the background
So many options.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-4-2006 @ 05:22 PM by ladr
|
I think the meeting is a smokescreen this year, the real meeting will take place with the top select cadre. As one member mentioned, the purpose of
the hidden meeting is to select the next POTUSA. And to further solidify how much profit on refined oil will be permitted, as the "chain store"
moguls are upset about their profits dropping.
[edit on 2-4-2006 by ladr]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-4-2006 @ 05:49 PM by Gazrok
|
Halifax, Nova Scotia....
EDIT: not till later this year though...
[edit on 2-4-2006 by Gazrok]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 2-4-2006 @ 09:49 PM by Prince Bernhard
|
A secretive organization posting a manifest of its attendees?
Clearly a smokescreen from the real meeting, Ladr is correct.
Deflection and counter intelligence is the paradigm of such an organization, trust me.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-4-2006 @ 01:51 PM by Eva
|
Deflection and counter-intelligence is good, yes. But how much better would it be to put something out there that is the flat-out, god’s honest
truth, and have others manipulate it in their own mind of their own accord?
No effort on your part at all, just make it so obvious that others believe there’s no way it COULD be.
That's an even bigger accomplishment...
There's a quote that says "The biggest trick the Devil ever played, was convincing the world that he didn't exist."
[edit on 4/4/2006 by Eva]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-4-2006 @ 07:34 AM by infinite
|
Bilderberg may well meet in the Easter week, 13-16th April, somewhere in Austria.
www.bilderberg.org...
Any one here from Austria that confirm this?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-4-2006 @ 07:51 AM by Hellmutt
|
Somewhere in Austria? Maybe a name which cannot be mentioned here? The perfect hideout. A place which name get caught up by every familyfriendly
sensors.
www.belowtopsecret.com...
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-4-2006 @ 08:39 AM by infinite
|
"Innsbruk" was brought up,
what is that place like Hellmutt? is it in the middle of no where?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-4-2006 @ 09:00 AM by nukunuku
|
Its a holzer land all the way, a well known skiing destination
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 9-4-2006 @ 09:03 AM by Hellmutt
|
Originally posted by infinite
"Innsbruk" was brought up,
what is that place like Hellmutt? is it in the middle of no where?
I think it´s a bit away from Innsbrück. This is "Upper Austria"...
en.wikipedia.org...
Towns in Upper Austria include
#ing (popular among tourists)
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-4-2006 @ 01:20 PM by Eva
|
The question to all is whether Austria the legitimate location or simply the one certain entities would like you to believe is legitimate.
ax5kl662
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-4-2006 @ 02:05 PM by Prince Bernhard
|
Austria is interesting given the current seat of the leadership of the EU. It does give excuses for certain people to be in the area on other
business. But this can be said of many locations.
Checking the press releases of certain organs and companies will give you more clues.
I cannot, but others may want to heed my advice.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-4-2006 @ 04:51 PM by paperclip
|
I live in Austria.
I am also quite busy though, so I can't really travel anywhere right now
If they meet in Vienna then I could take a few pics, otherwise we will have to use our imagination
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-4-2006 @ 05:10 PM by denythestatusquo
|
Originally posted by Umbrax
Donald Rumsfeld didn’t attend last year?
The location in Canada may be in Banff, Alberta. It is a pretty secure location and this is where the G8 met last time they were in Canada.
Uh no they met in an exclusive resort (owned by one of Canada's biggest banks), north of Toronto Ontario.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-4-2006 @ 05:41 PM by Umbrax
|
Originally posted by denythestatusquo
Uh no they met in an exclusive resort (owned by one of Canada's biggest banks), north of Toronto Ontario.
G8 Summit 2002. June 26–June 27 Canada Kananaskis, Alberta
I have a good memory of things that happen in my "back yard"
You must be thinking of the meeting in 1988. G8 has come to Canada twice since then.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 12-4-2006 @ 08:36 PM by Prince Bernhard
|
Originally posted by denythestatusquo
Originally posted by Umbrax
Donald Rumsfeld didn’t attend last year?
The location in Canada may be in Banff, Alberta. It is a pretty secure location and this is where the G8 met last time they were in Canada.
Uh no they met in an exclusive resort (owned by one of Canada's biggest banks), north of Toronto Ontario.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-4-2006 @ 08:56 PM by Shane
|
Whos Who of Whos who?
In one of the earlier posts, I noted a favorite of mine, and that was the Bilderberger top 100 list.
The Link went deeper than it should, although I understand the intent was to offer names.
www.bilderberg.org...
This link is a Web Page dedicated to the Annual meetings, with details from 91 to 2005.
Reviewing each Year, you can find some people, such as Conrad Black, Henry Kissenger and Queen Beatrix that have been at these meetings most, if not
all those years.
Along side with this, is the more important matter of what they each represent. Oil, Banks, Newpapers, and select Corperations. The list goes on and
is specific.
Ministers of Trade, Professers, Chancellors, EEC Foreign Ministers, Ambassadors and Military Personel, such as Nato Supreme Allied Commander, John
Glavin
Lafarge, Lufthansa, Fiat, ATT, News International, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, AIG Insurance, Council of Foreign Relations, Brookings
Institute, NBC News, Citi Corp, Chase Manhatten. All Companies which either are directly represented and/or part of the Organization. And this list
goes on and on.
These people make up a regular majority of these annual meetings. Every year, some twenty or so new people arrive, or replace vacant spots. Of course,
1991 was the Year of the Rat, (Sorry) the year of Bill Clinton's Intro.
The point I wish to make, is sit back with a Six Pack and a few packs of smokes, and review for yourself, each year upto 2005. The Names remain the
same, and the new people, curiously enough, BECOME something in the year or so to follow their first visit. PM of Canada, Steven Harper. Bill Clinton,
and the list goes on. These people are being presented to the Members for their blessing, and support of the Organization, and again, that
organization is made up of the most Powerful People and Multinational Corperations on the earth.
Let us all know what your review of this concludes.
Just a passive get together, or enough to deserve and require indepth reporting and scrutiny.
Ciao
Shane
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-4-2006 @ 10:07 PM by tracer
|
How about a public invite, why are we not allowed to attend meetings of this type, just because they do not desire the presence of normal citizens? I
think its about time the normal citizens found them out and just somehow find a way to attend , with or without their consent. They just so easily go
about their way plotting and planning whatever it is they plot and plan, untouched or even slightly challenged about their agenda, time to change all
that somehow and let them know that they need to go way underground to have their meetings. Thats my opinion of these people and what I think or care
about them is even less.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-4-2006 @ 11:00 PM by denythestatusquo
|
Originally posted by Umbrax
Originally posted by denythestatusquo
Uh no they met in an exclusive resort (owned by one of Canada's biggest banks), north of Toronto Ontario.
G8 Summit 2002. June 26–June 27 Canada Kananaskis, Alberta
I have a good memory of things that happen in my "back yard"
You must be thinking of the meeting in 1988. G8 has come to Canada twice since then.
I assume that you live in Western Canada... myself I live in Toronto.
The meeting that was in King City north of Toronto was in 1996 and I remember it well. There has not been a meeting here since. I think the meeting
you are referring to was a G8 meeting which I also remembered. Prior to 2000 records of meetings I am having difficulty finding a list right now but
will post other Canadian meetings as I find them. I know that Bilderberg met in Canada prior to 1996 and you may be referring to one of those meetings
in 1988.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |