Did you ever want to know, exactly where HARRP was...?

page: 1
15
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join

posted on Dec, 13 2005 @ 01:34 PM
link   
Here you go :

Where is the HAARP facility located?
The HAARP Observatory is located approximately 8 miles north of Gakona, Alaska.
What are the geographic coordinates of the observatory?
The facility is located at:
62 deg 23.5 min North Latitude
145 deg 8.8 min West Longitude

HAARP itself is located in Gakona, AK which is approx. 160 miles northeast of Anchorage. It's an array of 48 72-foot high antennas which send out bursts of the aforementioned electromagnetic radiation. These bursts heat the ions in the ionosphere, some even say "boiling" the upper atmosphere.

I've found a couple good pieces on pre-HAARP and early HAARP research on this sort of technology:
twm.co.nz... - GJF MacDonald
twm.co.nz... - Tom Bearden
Kind of heavy, but good reads.

There's no real short, concise reply to "What is HAARP?" I wish there was. It's something more than the Navy, Air Force, and the University of Alaska is telling the public.
Basically, it's a mechanism that beams gigawatts of electromagnetic radiation (at a time!) into our upper atmosphere for reasons which are unclear.
If you're still confused, do a Google search for HAARP. Add your own specific terms (weather, mind, effects, earthquakes, etc). You'll find more info than you can possibly digest in a week, let alone an evening.

My head hurts now.




posted on Dec, 13 2005 @ 03:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by SpartanKingLeonidas
for reasons which are unclear.


According to the military, basically its to study secure future military communications.



posted on Dec, 19 2005 @ 12:15 AM
link   
Actually, they have an annual open house and they're very obviously located on many maps of Alaska. I emailed them to ask about the open house when we visited Alaska, and they did reply... but it wasn't held during the time we were going to be there.



posted on Dec, 19 2005 @ 01:18 AM
link   
I used those coordinates on google earth and all I can see is the "HAARP Access road", everything else is real blurry



posted on Dec, 19 2005 @ 06:33 AM
link   
HAARP Website

What is HAARP

FAQs

HAARP Webcam

Of course, all this is irrelevant because clearly the authorities are lying



posted on Dec, 20 2005 @ 07:08 PM
link   
I posted the patent #s somewhere on ATS. Here we go again.



U.S. Patent 4686605:
Method And Apparatus For Altering A Region In The Earth's Atmosphere,
Ionosphere, And/Or Magnetosphere
Inventors: Eastlund; Bernard J., Spring, TX
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Los Angeles, CA
Issued: Aug. 11, 1987
Filed: Jan. 10, 1985

U.S. Patent 5038664:
Method For Producing A Shell Of Relativistic Particles At An Altitude
Above The Earth's Surface
Inventors: Eastlund; Bernard J., Spring, TX
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued: Aug. 13, 1991
Filed: Jan. 10, 1985

U.S. Patent 4712155:
Method And Apparatus For Creating An Artificial Electron Cyclotron
Heating Region Of Plasma
Inventors: Eastlund; Bernard J., Spring, TX
Ramo; Simon, Beverly Hills, CA
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Los Angeles, CA
Issued: Dec. 8, 1987
Filed: Jan. 28, 1985

U.S. Patent 5068669:
Power Beaming System
Inventors: Koert; Peter, Washington, DC
Cha; James T., Fairfax, VA
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued: Nov. 26, 1991
Filed: Sep. 1, 1988

U.S. Patent 5218374:
Power Beaming System With Printer Circuit Radiating Elements
Having Resonating Cavities
Inventors: Koert; Peter, Washington, DC
Cha; James T., Fairfax, VA
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued: June 8, 1993
Filed: Oct. 10, 1989

U.S. Patent 5293176:
Folded Cross Grid Dipole Antenna Element
Inventors: Elliot; Paul G., Vienna, VA
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued: Mar. 8, 1994
Filed: Nov. 18, 1991

U.S. Patent 5202689:
Lightweight Focusing Reflector For Space
Inventors: Bussard; Robert W., Manassas, VA
Wallace; Thomas H., Gainesville, FL
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued: Apr. 13, 1993
Filed: Aug. 23, 1991

U.S. Patent 5041834:
Artificial Ionospheric Mirror Composed Of A Plasma Layer
Which Can Be Tilted
Inventors: Koert; Peter, Washington, DC
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued: Aug. 20, 1991
Filed: May. 17, 1990

U.S. Patent 4999637:
Creation Of Artificial Ionization Clouds Above The Earth
Inventors: Bass; Ronald M., Houston, TX
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued: Mar. 12, 1991
Filed: May. 14, 1987

U.S. Patent 4954709:
High Resolution Directional Gamma Ray Detector
Inventors: Zigler; Arie, Rishon Le Zion, Israel
Eisen; Yosset, Rishon Le Zion, Israel
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued: Sep. 4, 1990
Filed: Aug. 16, 1989

U.S. Patent 4817495:
Defense System For Discriminating Between Objects In Space
Inventors: Drobot; Adam T., Annandale, VA
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Los Angeles, CA
Issued: Apr. 4, 1989
Filed: Jul. 7, 1986

U.S. Patent 4873928:
Nuclear-Sized Explosions Without Radiation
Inventors: Lowther; Frank E., Plano, TX
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Los Angeles, CA
Issued: Oct. 17, 1989
Filed: June 15, 1987

Essentially it is a weapon. They will deny that it is and that it can't be used for weather control as well as the usual denials but anyone with a brain can realize the implications of the potential uses of such a "project".


[edit on 20-12-2005 by Infra_red]



posted on Dec, 21 2005 @ 07:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by Infra_red

Essentially it is a weapon. They will deny that it is and that it can't be used for weather control as well as the usual denials but anyone with a brain can realize the implications of the potential uses of such a "project".


How do you draw those conclusions?



posted on Dec, 13 2007 @ 02:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by Essan

How do you draw those conclusions?


I would imagine he read the patents...




posted on Dec, 13 2007 @ 04:09 AM
link   
Any particular reason you resurrected a 2 year old thread just to say that Zorgon?

Anyway, more on what HAARP can really do here:

foia.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Dec, 13 2007 @ 06:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by Essan
Any particular reason you resurrected a 2 year old thread just to say that Zorgon?


LOL didn't notice it was two years old till I posted
But thanks... There is so much data around you miss things until something else points the way. And those patents tell a lot of the story



Anyway, more on what HAARP can really do here:

foia.abovetopsecret.com...


It can also activate the ummm 'coating' on certain 'objects' and make them essentially disappear... from sight as well as radar



[edit on 13-12-2007 by zorgon]



posted on Dec, 13 2007 @ 07:15 PM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 


Sometimes reruns are useful.

I found this thread to be interesting and had good info.

The document posted is very good, but hard to read all at once, Essan.



posted on Dec, 13 2007 @ 07:37 PM
link   
Okay, I am no techno-geek so bear with me here...

I was looking at the above linked FOIA document and on page 13 it discusses the alleged communications enhancement aspects of HAARP. The document references the technology's ability to enhance UHF/VHF communications.

Could the government's initiative to force all televised broadcasts to digital possibly be related to the next phase of HAARP and, if so, why and what will it look like?

Sorry if this is too much of a stretch.



posted on Dec, 14 2007 @ 09:13 AM
link   
I don't find it to be too much of a stretch at all.

The more I try to comprehend of this matter the more my head spins.

There was another thread actually suggesting the same thing you said and I believe another poster mentioned that in the UK or Britian they have already been using digital for nine years.

I think it has much to do with what is going on and I also think there have been weapons made that can disintegrate planes in midair.

Either it has to do with our land communications or it is this much talked about StarWars system that the PTB have been drooling over for so long.



posted on Dec, 14 2007 @ 06:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by Byrd
Actually, they have an annual open house and they're very obviously located on many maps of Alaska.


Lawrence Livermore National Labs has a 'tour' every Tuesday but it oin't take you to the secret areas


Google Earth lets me look at China's new Nuclear Plant...



But the best I can get for HAARP is this...




posted on Dec, 17 2007 @ 01:27 PM
link   
HAARP

Did You Know?....



www.youtube.com...



posted on Jan, 10 2008 @ 01:26 PM
link   
reply to post by Infra_red
 


U.S. Patent 4686605:
Method And Apparatus For Altering A Region In The Earth's Atmosphere,
Ionosphere, And/Or Magnetosphere
Inventors: Eastlund; Bernard J., Spring, TX
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Los Angeles, CA
Issued: Aug. 11, 1987
Filed: Jan. 10, 1985

From the above mentioned patent.


Still further, plumes in accordance with the present invention can be formed to simulate and/or perform the same functions as performed by the detonation of a "heave" type nuclear device without actually having to detonate such a device. Thus it can be seen that the ramifications are numerous, far-reaching, and exceedingly varied in usefulness.
emphasis added.

Sounds to me this invention can do the same thing as a nuclear bomb.

Patent

[edit on 10-1-2008 by etshrtslr]



posted on Jan, 10 2008 @ 01:43 PM
link   
Registering a patent does not mean that the item can actually do what it says in the patent


Fortunately ATS has provided us with firm evidence of what HAARP can really do

foia.abovetopsecret.com...

Unfortunately, not everyone reads ATS


[edit on 10-1-2008 by Essan]



posted on Jan, 10 2008 @ 02:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by Essan
Registering a patent does not mean that the item can actually do what it says in the patent


Fortunately ATS has provided us with firm evidence of what HAARP can really do


Unfortunately they left out all the good stuff in the public release version


They also fail to mention the network of other arrays



And most certainly don't tell you what it does in relation to 'cloaking' technology



Stay tuned on Sunday I will have time....

[edit on 10-1-2008 by zorgon]



posted on Jan, 10 2008 @ 02:40 PM
link   
reply to post by Essan
 


I guess its all just a coincidence the patent references weapons applications from the invention and a military contractor owns the rights to the patent.



posted on Jan, 10 2008 @ 03:58 PM
link   
Another patent owned by APTI, Inc. which is the same owner of one the HAARP patent I posted in a previous post on this thread.


Nuclear-sized explosions without radiation



A method for producing a high yield explosion without radioactive fallout comprising filling an expendible structure with an explosive mixture of a combustible gas (e.g. methane) and an oxidizer gas (e.g. oxygen) and then detonating said mixture.


Patent

APTI Inc. is in the business of developing weapons and to think they would not be trying to develop weapons from the various patents they own and are utilized in HAARP is in my opinion very naive.




new topics
top topics
 
15
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join