It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Conspicuouz
doesn't matter who you put to 'protect' iraq .. nationalist will still attack, snipe, w/e any forces who occupy their country.
damned if you do, damned if you don't
Originally posted by Conspicuouz
doesn't matter who you put to 'protect' iraq .. nationalist will still attack, snipe, w/e any forces who occupy their country.
[edit on 17/11/05 by JAK]
Originally posted by Dronetek
Like I've said many times before, it aint going to happen.
Originally posted by Dronetek
Edit: Since you guys like conspiracies so much, perhaps you could explain why it is the major media news outlets seem to be doing as much as they can to damage the president?
Originally posted by Dronetek
The American people voted for this president and support the war. No matter how much the media tried to convince you otherwise.
Originally posted by alphabetaone
Originally posted by Dronetek
Like I've said many times before, it aint going to happen.
Yes it will, eventually.
Originally posted by Dronetek
Edit: Since you guys like conspiracies so much, perhaps you could explain why it is the major media news outlets seem to be doing as much as they can to damage the president?
Hmmm...seems to me that not long ago the media was being slated as being SO Pro-Bush that even a lot of posters on here seemed to believe they were under White House control, so now conspiracy # 1 (OMG we love Bush because, he buys us?) has ended but to inflame conspiracy #2 ? (OMG we HAVE to damage bush's agenda at ANY cost!)
I doubt even the Media giants would ride both sides of the fence so flagrantly and hope it would escape notice. No, i think perhaps a lot of LIGHT is being shed on the realities of the current administration, and the Media doesnt want to get caught in a situation where it may appear as though they are strong supporters of a President that may or may not have misled the american public in a variety of ways (if that turns out to be the reality of the situation).
Originally posted by Dronetek
The American people voted for this president and support the war. No matter how much the media tried to convince you otherwise.
The American people voted Bush in yes, but to say that NOW the majority support the war in that same sentence i think is a somewhat irresponsible claim, considering (since a majority of the posters here DO in fact quote media source) that the polls say that the average American now shows waning support.
What amazes me the most is how the US gov't can deal with this Chalabi (sp?) character - an Iranian sympathizer who lied about Hussein's "WMD's" in order to get the US to invade Iraq (and not to mention the US just 'trusting his sincerity') - and is considered one of the shadiest crooks in the region by Middle East countries ALONE!