It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Terrorists Have No Geneva Rights. Al Qaeda is not governed by the Geneva Conventions, which applies only to international conflicts between states that have signed them.
About 500 people are being held at the detention centre without charges as enemy combatants in the US war on terrorism, most of them captured in 2001 in Afghanistan.
Originally posted by Astronomer68
Personally, I don't think that would be wise. If no international treaty like the Geneva Conventions covers these people then each country is left to decide how they should be treated. That is how it was before the Geneva Conventions and it didn't work out so well. Further, your last argument is a little subjective don't you think? We may think the current situation is indeed fine, but from all the bad press we've been getting it pretty obvious a lot of others do not.
[edit on 30-10-2005 by Astronomer68]
Originally posted by Astronomer68
Your last argument is good. In essence you are saying we have to hold them because there was no real government in Afganistan to deal with them. That's a valid point, but who decides when they should be returned to Afganistan for disposition? There simply is no body of law that I'm aware of dealing with the current situation.
Originally posted by Odium
So, Whompa1, you are fine with innocent people being held as long as we have a few terrorists as well?
Do you not see the large impact that has on helping to create even more terrorists?
Without a jury based trail those people are innocent, while the United States holds them without such a thing it is boosting those who join these "terrorist" organisations. It is helping to feed their ideology. If they wish to show the United States in a bad light they do not even have to try anymore.
Surely, if the United States is this force for good like Bush seems to want it to be than it has to be. As for the idea these people are not soldiers that is a joke to be honest. So they do not have a uniform? How many of those poorer Middle Eastern and African Nation's can afford such a thing?
If they were caught fighting the United States, then they can be classed as a soldier. If they were arrested by the Northern Allience...well...that speeks for itself. If you deal with drug lords, you are going to get screwed.