It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by subz
So what are you trying to tell us Riwka? When Palestinians blow up innocent people they are terrorists, but when Israel's founding fathers do it its ok and they get airports named after them?
Source
Since then, there have been 6,739 Israeli casualties, including 862 deaths, and 23,593 Palestinian casualties, including 2,233 dead.
Originally posted by Odium
I do not support the Taliban, however I do not support the Northern Alliance. Do you support them?
Because, I see no major difference between either of the groups.
Originally posted by Odium
That is not liberation.
That is not freedom.
Source
The Afghan challenge is tougher by some measures than the Colombian one. In the Colombian case, drug revenue amounts to about 3.5 percent of legal economic output; in Afghanistan the share is more than 50 percent. The opium trade has boomed since the fall of the Taliban regime three years ago, generating payments to farmers of $2.2 billion in 2002-03, 15 times more than in the two years leading up to the Taliban's departure. A determined counternarcotics offensive, particularly one that focuses on crop eradication, risks generating a backlash against the fragile democratic government.
Source
The Alliance, which has won American support in its battle against the
Taliban, produced 150 metric tonnes of opium this year, according to Mohammad Amirkhizi, senior policy adviser at the United Nations Office for Drug Control and Crime Prevention.
Source
A survey by the UN Office on Drugs and Crime has found that Afghanistan has supplanted Burma as the world's largest source of illegal heroin. There are now 741 square kilometres of land being used to cultivate opium poppies in Afghanistan, compared to just 78km2 prior to the US invasion in late 2001.
Source
The reporting of heroin/opiate-related deaths was highest in Detroit (464) and Philadelphia (111).
Originally posted by Odium
Ohh, so because they "target" someone in a civilian area than it is O.K?
Originally posted by Odium
So what of the bombing of Chowkar-Karez?
Originally posted by Odium
The United States assumed that these people supported the Taliban and thus attacked them. This was fine...because they supported a political ideology the United States didn't agree with. [1]
Originally posted by Odium
This is no different when a Palestinian attacks a civilian area, they agree with the "Zionist" ideology as much as those villiagers did. However, I do not see a massive outcry against the United States for the same action.
Originally posted by Odium
You also miss the point, so what if they gave the Gaza Strip back? It is not what they want. Shared rule of Jerusalum is and the only way that can happen is to give it over to a National form of Goverment. Why would that be so hard for them?
Originally posted by Odium
You also have to remember this land means nothing to the people who lost family - especailly innocent members of their family. That will take so long for it to heal and while those people are alive and Israel keeps on bombing civilian areas [which is the same] they will only help to make the situation worse.
Originally posted by Freedom_for_sum
A barrister is training? You've got a lot to learn!!
Originally posted by subz
You mean the King David Hotel bombing?
So what are you trying to tell us Riwka? When Palestinians blow up innocent people they are terrorists, but when Israel's founding fathers do it its ok and they get airports named after them?
Originally posted by infinite
You have yet to NAME a right-winged Christian terrorist organization in the US.
what the HELL is the Klu Klux Klan then?
there is "The Order" and "Christian Identity" aswell,
plus the US Republican Party
But Odium, this is NOT the topic
"What-Did-The-Jews-Especially the-Zionists-Before-Israel-Has-Been-Established-And How-Do-We-Judge-This-Today"
- this one is "Iran's President Calls For Israel's Destruction"
Originally posted by stumason
Whilst it may not be the thread title, I believe discussing the Israeli/Palestinian conflict is pertinent to the topic, otherwise, why else would the Iranians be saying what they say?
Originally posted by Riwka
Again Odium - this is NOT the topic
"How-And-Why-Has-Israel-Been-Established"
This one is: Iran's President Calls For Israel's Destruction
A member of the United Nations calls for the destruction of another people. This is a clear contravention and breach of the UN charter.
Please feel free to add your commends according to the topic, ok?
[edit on 31-10-2005 by Riwka]