It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Souljah
Fine - suit yourself!
I bet there are some True alegations against your country men, but HEH they don't get reported either.
Well - if your fellow countryman (the UK with mister Tony in charge) are the best allies of the US, then its pretty much obvious Who your enemy is, we don't have to "define" anything.
Choices based on What? On some Lies? Some rambling of a crazed US president?
And do you still think that? Do you still think that Saddam was a "massive threat to the world peace"? Do you still think he had WMDs? I don't. You know WHO is the Massive Threat to the World Peace? Yea, you guessed it. The "Coalition of the Willing".
How do you know that? Were you there? How can you be so Sure of that? Are you an Iraqi? Did you see that with your own eyes?
Hmmmm... How come that this LAW can define that Saddam was breaking it, but it can not "define" the US and UK breaking it? Strange...
DU is a Radioactive Ammunition (the word DEPLETED means, that it has been used once, and that it was severly radioactive). The problem with it is, that its an extremly great material for ammunitions because of its penetration capabilites and no other element in the Period scale is capable of doing that. And there is alot of it laying around. Chea, Effective - Who CARES if its radioactive! I am sure that veterans from first Gulf war that have the so-called "gulf-war-syndrome" will have alot to say about it. But ofcourse - you belive the Pentagon and Downing street. Fine. Belive them then.
Well - you would not have this problem if the invasion never occured. And I wonder who used this words: "Bring It On!". Hmmmm.... Your Friend and Ally?
Again - HOW can you be so SURE of that?
Who did the Iraqi police catch then in Basra?
Agents 008 and 009 with their Pants down?
Please! Your defence for the Military is just too obvious. An ex Soldier, aren't you?
I find it interestin that you KNOW what happend and you are so Sure that your precious armed forces did not do Anything wrong - all the Crap that happens is a work of Terrorist, right? I wonder where you get that information. You work in Defence Ministry?
DU is not JUST another METAL - when it Explodes it releases a Deadly Dust. You sound so Sure that it is Harmless - why not go to the battlefield and inhale the air in Fallujah after it has been bombed? You wanna check what DU does to the Human Body after it Enters?
*cough*BULL*cough*cough* - Different? How? Because UK have another Accent to English? You think the Insurgents look at you "Differently"? You think when they see the UK Uniform they say: "OH WAIT, don't shoot him, they did not allow Iraqi Musems to be robbed! They are on the same sute, but they are "Different" from the US Troops."
So you are saying that you are ALSO under the UK & US Propaganda machine?
You read the News right?
BBC - UK troops in Iraqi torture probe
Guardian - UK forces taught torture methods
Why MUST they solve the Problems of the Middle East? Why must they solve the problems of Iraq? What makes these people so Special and the Africans Not? Do you think, that if in Sudan they found WMD's, UK and US forces would go there and "Liberate" these people? What do they need to do, so that it would get your Precious attention? Isn't Dying in Tens of Thousands a DAY Enough for you? You Friggin Imperialists!
Originally posted by IAF101
Firstly, all of which you refer to is mere speculation and wild conspiracy, just because people write about it on the internet doesnt make it true.
Also as this is a conspiracy site I guess you could continue to delude yourself like such but in the real world you'd go to the nut house.
Second, none of these so called wild accusations have been proved and until they are proved they are mere fiction. That is the way it works with the rational but I cant expect that from you
America represents the best of Humanity, thats my opinion!
Which is pretty good I think, as morals are definitely required as are diplomatic skills and also the military.
Hey, we live by the NewYork minute, Gandhian approach doesnt exactly cut it in speed.
so now wanting to be the best is bad? Global Leadership doesnt mean enslaving the world, it means being the best in the world at what you do. Its one of those business lingos.
# because of Terrorism and an attack on American Soil.
#To ensure that fight against Terrorism is strong, a global effort and not by America unilateraly and again to safe gaurd america.
#A good deed. Saviours for people who are oppressed by tyrants
# Just as any rational nation would do- make friends and keep friends especially in a time of need.
Firstly, I am not Aussie and secondly none of this has any PROOF ! Its all hearsay and speculation nothing concrete. Also if the liberals thought that this was a sham they would have taken it to the supreme court but they didnt because they knew they lost fair and square and no amount of whining is going to change that.
Maybe thats why we defeated it, I dont remember reading in any history book about how Slovenians fought bravely against the Italians?
Fascism has not 14 but 1 point and that is total and absolute authority of a few individuals.
So a natural disaster has taken away our rights and liberties?
Cant you find any thing even remotely logical to counter a statement ? Guess not!
Outer states ? like as in Alaska or hawai ? what outer states?
I think you mean "backward European state" right?
You dont have to be so overtly Jelous Souljah! You could kind of hide it or something
Their every thing? Thats the scientific explanation?
Souljah, are you in grade school ? A sonar is sound, it weakens as distance increases. Sonar is detectable by a few fish only and that too faintly unless they are real close.
Also, the destruction of man is more important than forest. If the forest go and man survives then too bad but if man dies and the forests survive then its no point.
That means we need tobe cut some slack as well and more appreciation not slander and lies against us, support the US for it works for humanity and for the second part yes it is better for humanity, if we dont do it somebody has to do it, will YOU ?
Originally posted by cjf
In regards to ‘these’ fourteen points which are so eagerly displayed...Blahblahblah!
Originally posted by devilwasp
I suppose there are a few , frankly those that do are shameful and well dont get tolerated by the MOD.
In intel supplied from most of the world, unless your denying that most of the worlds intelligence services believed what we believed?
Also, BTW, there was WMD's there just in VERY small amounts, forgotten cahes or being destroyed.
I still believe he was.
BTW, everyone is a threat to world peace, just some are bigger than others.
How do I know?
I've spoken, worked and lived with UK troops.
I've also read and researched about iraq.
We respect civilians and we do not use them as shields.
Period.
Simply, I am not denying we broke the law to go into iraq.
But just because we broke one doesnt mean we continuely break the rules.
Yet again, your going off topic, you want to complain about DU go ahead.
DU amunition is simply ONE FORM of chemicals used in combat.
Every weapon is chemical, unless of course your trying to break the laws of physics and chemistry?
Yet again, show me the difference between a civilian and a REGULAR SQUAD LEVEL insurgent or "resistance" fighter.
Two SAS men in a car driving with survielance gear, but wait ofcourse that makes em bad guys right'?
Nope, 17.
I'm SCC, and also I defend the military because they defend me.
The military makes mistakes and people inside the military ethier make mistakes or do wrong.
I never said it was harmless, not at all.
Want to see what a 7.62mm sniper round will do the human flesh?
I've seen what a 22 air rifle can do to human skin with just a piece of rubber , and I've seen what the weapons used in iraq can do, the rifles at least.
Thats your opinion, only a fool would not notice the difference between the UK an US soldiers.
A) they fight differently.
B) they dress differently
C) they talk diferently
D) They tend to think differently
Yes and no, I watch it everyday along with middle eastern propaganda.
Nothing is unbiased, its all grey.
Yet again, its taught to the troops, it was never said to be used by UK troops.
Yet again though, how do you define torture?
By the dictionary or by what YOU know?
We're the only ones that seem to care, THATS why we do it.
Originally posted by Souljah
Could it be that MoD is Hiding some of them from your own eyes?
Naaah! Where did you hear about goverments Lying?
Intel supplied from where? Mossad? Please, go and watch some of the Bush speeches before the Iraq Invasion: Saddam has Biological weapons, Saddam has Chemical weapons (sure, the US sold them to him!), Saddam has Nuclea weapons. Basicly the Administration was only looking for EXCUSES for war, not for Reasons.
I don't. I think that US and UK are the biggest threat to the World Peace since the days of Nazi's. Imperialism and Fascism has gotten a new face, this time more Deceptive then ever.
Meaing only that you are under their INFULENCE. You were not there. You have not seen ANYTHING. You don't know anything. You just know what your goverments tells you to know. And you belive that without a shadow of a doubt.
Aha! So you ADMIT you broke the International Law by invading? What do you expect from the world then? To just sit and watch you illegaly occupying a soverign country?
No - DU was strictly forbidden by the UN, becaue it is breaking numerous Conventions and International Laws against Humanity. PERIOD.
Insurgent is Armed.
Show me the Difference between an Iraqi civilan and a SAS Commanod working under False Flag operations, disguised in Arabic Clothing?
What did they have in the CAR?
What 17? 17 years old? And whats SCC?
You feel secure with the military? You think they defend you?
So, let's say they made a mistake and they god an order that you were a terrorist and they shot you in the head seven times. Would you still think that the miltiary was just "protecting you"?
You wanna breath the Air filled with poisonous DU dust for the rest of your life?
You wanna have DU all over your body, coming from lungs to your kidneys, to your bones, slowly killing you? DU is not as Harmfull as you think it is. Its a New Weapon and the Long Term consequences have not been discovered YET - in time it will be shown what kind of effects DU has on human body. Bottom line is that, there is ALOT of this material laying around and that it is Perfect for ammunition - and that ALL the ARMY needs to know! Period.
AGAIN - do you think an averege Iraqi Insurgents CARES for this 4 POINTS?
But you also agre that the Army must Always protect itself and always make the story White for themselves, and never report the Black side?
International LAW Defines Torture against the Prisoners of War and the Law is very detailed about how they should and should NOT be treated!
Such "Care" you have shown in Iraq yes. Just brings tears to my eyes.
Laws are not about morals they are legality.
Originally posted by yanchek
Sorry kid, but every law (in theory) has to emrace at least a minimum of morality of society.
I suggest you read Sophocles' Antigone. A classic dilemma between morality and legality. It shows very well what happens when you follow the law to the letter and forget the moral obligation.
Originally posted by Souljah
Here is a Quote for You from the Link that you provided:
Originally posted by Souljah
Yep. They sure are an Unending Task - ask your President.
Originally posted by devilwasp
No it couldnt.
The MOD has MP's which investigate itself ruthlessly and efficiently.
Hey I am not interested in BUSH, I am insterested in blair and what the rest of the world thought not just the US.
Then your thinking is flawed, in my opinion.
You realise that the UK gave up imperialism quite some time ago?
You also realise that the UK is not facist.
But hey ofcourse terrorists with only the goal they want and a fanatical will are not threats ofcourse.
No, I read from both sides of the argument, its YOU who only believes the other side.
You believe what iraqis say without a shadow of a doubt as you call it.
Also I am not under thier influence, I was not there, I have not seen it with my own eyes but nethier have you.
But that doesnt mean I dont know anything.
Yeah we broke the law, seems only fair since everyone else does but we are held to different standards, isnt double standards fun?
As I said DU is just one form of chemical weapons , unless your trying to say that EVERY WEAPON doesnt break laws against humanity since ofcourse it doesnt treat others with respect.
Civilians are armed to.
Simple, SAS men do not commit false flag operations and wear arabic clothing only because the enemy does.
If they wear a distunguishable marker SAS men will to.
Also, the SAS is simply one of the SF units in the MOD but heh ofcourse no one knows this because its simpler to believe what the news tells us before researching.
Survialance gear, but heh ofcourse you'll believe an iraqi policeman in a force infiltrated by murderers and thugs without any other evidence than his word over british officials with evidence.
If they "made a mistake" and shot me 7 times in the head because they thought I was a terrorist I would understand.
Wow now I know why the MOD is low on cash.
I've had lead dust in my lungs from shooting, handled lead for about what 3 years and been breathing in lead fumes from soldering for longer does that mean lead should be banned?
DU is a weapon, weapons are dangerous.
I am not saying its good but nethier is war good.
I am not saying its nice weapon but frankly nethier is using rape, murder, torture or terror as weapons good.
No, and they dont.
Laws are not about morals they are legality.
Originally posted by Souljah
Goverments do LIE you know - and Politicians also.
Especially the Miltiary Branch of the Goverment - they have to make sure, that people Support the War (like yourself).
Well, you HAVE to be Interested in Bushl, becaue Blair is right behind him, doing everything he wants him to.
Basicly meaning you are one, but in two different forms. If Bush would say: go and invade Iran tomorrow - Blair would do it. Just like with the Illegal Invason of Iraq - did it get support from the Rest of the World? Or just by UK?
When did UK give up their Imperliasm?
You know what I think?
That UK is trying to maintain the little role it has in the World right now, to backup the US Empire, so it can again taste the sweet Imperliasm, it once made it Strong and Powerful. Is Nostalgia getting to you? Also facts are, that the Northern Atlatnic Oil Rigs are running Dangerously Low on Reserves - and where else to go and get some cheap oil, then in Middle East! Hell Yeah!
I also READ both sides of the Argument - and do You belive the Other side too?
Judging by your statements, you belive only 1 side - the Army side. IMHO you are under the influence of the Armed Forces and you are interested in them - maybe that's why you like Shooting (as stated in your little Biography). I don't like Shooting. I don't like the Army. I don't like Wars. I don't like anything to do with Weapons and Killing. Do You?
Sure it's fun - if you are playing the Role of the Winnder who gets to choose and say: " I can do that, and you CANT!". That is also called HYPOCHRISY. That's fun too, right?
Read:
In 1996 and 1997, the United Nations Human Rights Commission in Geneva, passed a resolution to ban the use of depleted uranium weapons. The Subcommission adopted resolutions which include depleted uranium weaponry amongst "weapons of mass and indiscriminate destruction, ... incompatible with international humanitarian or human rights law." (Secretary General's Report, 24 June 1997, E/CN. 4/Sub.2/1997/27)
A UN report of 2002 states that DU weapons also potentially breach each of the following laws: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights; the Charter of the United Nations; the Genocide Convention; the Convention Against Torture; the four Geneva Conventions of 1949; the Conventional Weapons Convention of 1980; and the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907. All of these laws are designed to spare civilians from unwarranted suffering in or after armed conflicts.
According to the UN, the resolutions in 1996-97 were passed because DU breaches several international laws concerning inhumane weapons: it is not limited in time or space to the legal field of battle, or to military targets; it continues to act after the war; it is "inhumane" by virtue of its ability to cause prolonged or long term death by cancer and other serious health issues, it causes harm to future civilians and passers by (including unborn children and those breathing the air or drinking water); and it has an "unduly negative" and long term effect on the natural environment and food chain.
en.wikipedia.org...
SAS Operatives are dressed as Civilans too.
Yes they do - and they were CAUGHT doing it.
And it is Simpler to just BELIVE what the MoD tell you it happend, then to think with Your Own Head and judge for Yourself.
If Murderous Thugs can inflirtate Iraqi Police - so can SAS dress as civilans and go Undercover.
How are the Iraqi Police supposed to know what are they?
They Looked like "Terrorists" with all the Equipment, the Weapons and the Civilan Clothing? They are Lucky to be Alive.
I don't feel secure when the Military comes.
It only means two things: there is going to be Shooting and People are going to Die. That does not make me feel safe, but it makes me feel Unsafe and Nervous.
Even if you would be Innocent?
Wouldn't you say they jumped some Conclusions and were, simply, "Trigger Happy"? Is Paranoia Patriotic these days?
MoD is NEVER low on cash.
Well if you would be Inhalind DU dust for 3 Years, I think you would start to have some serious medical Problems by now.
You know why? Because DU is MUCH Worse then Lead and that's the whole problem here.
Ofcourse the Army is saying "NOOOOO!" and denying everything - but still, DU does damage your body, much, MUCH worse then any other Material used for Ammunition. Period.
Yes they Do.
Why did they even Bother to Write down this Laws?
Once they work, and once they don't.
"It's BAD if Saddam kills People - but We can!"
Originally posted by devilwasp
That is true, the government do lie.
BTW, I do support the war and I havent been "brainwashed" no more than you have.
Really?
Care to explain the EU then?
The war got quite a few countries support or are you saying that the UK and the US are the only 2 countries with military troops in iraq?
About the time of the american war of independance.
It showed we had gave up makeing takeing over more countries and the end of the british "empire" as we knew it.
There is no US empire since the US isnt in a position nor has the ability to do so.
The UK doesnt want imperialism, why try to take over the world when it just screws you over time and time again for everything and anything.
But heh then again its easier to blame the two "bad guys" than it is to think outside the box...
C) I like shooting because well its fun, I dont like killing but I accept it needs to be done.
There are no winners and losers in war, only one side who was better off.
As I said , if you want to complain about DU weapons go and see someone else but frankly DU weapons are just one more form of chemical weapons.
Only when the mission requires them to fight an enemy who hides amoungst civilians.
No they where caught doing a survielance operation, as I suggested since there was only 2 of them.
Yes it is, thats why I dont.
But mabye its easier to believe what the resistance tell you to believe than to think with your own head and mabye the MOD is right.
Yeah they can.
Mabye by saying, "can I see some id?"
What defines a "Terrorist" ? Holding a weapon?
Wrong, gun ownership is legal in iraq and the coalition forces allow it to go on with out confiscating weapons.
Or is this another lie?
Thats a very closed opinion, what about the medical branch?
SAR operations?
Humanitarian aid missions?
Or are these lies too?
No, I'd say they had poor info, as tony said ; "I only know what I have been told." That is true in everything.
Oh really?
Ha! You really are ignorant of us arnt you?
You realise we have budget cuts , VERY bad ones these days?
You realise that the RN has only 9 destroyers in the fleet? China has more than that.
You realise our FAA flies subsonic 20 year old jets?
You realise we have to combine regiments and now the army is down to its smallest size?
You realise that the RMC's are now down to just 6000 men?
You realise the MOD is cutting back on 1/3rd of its ammunition to help in iraq?
Yeah and lead isnt bad?
Really?
So what about nuclear warheads? Are they not as bad as DU?
Yet again more generalising, also I havent heard any MOD report denying DU dammage.
No they dont.
Know what, I know just what to do next time that will show that up..
Originally posted by Souljah
Yes I know you do support the War, probably because it's "Fun" for you. You are still Young and Inexperienced. You will Learn soon...
You mean the Coalition of the Willing?
You mean the "Coalition of the Wealthy"?
Although the Coalition of the Willing only contained about a quarter of the world's countries, it contains a disproportionately large fraction of the world's economically powerful countries. For instance, the CoW contained:
15 of the 30 OECD nations;
15 of the 27 EU nations (Including the two acceding nations);
5 of the top 10 nations by GDP;
4 of the G8 nations;
Nations with 61% of the global GDP
Where are the BIG European Allies, like Germany, France that were in the Coalition during the First Gulf Wars?
So you think that the Falkland Wars were Not fought with Imperliastic thoughts in their heads?
Just like UK invaded America during the war of idependance?
Yes there is a US Empire - and I understand you if you don't want to accept that, because by accepting that, you will have to also accept that UK does also have Imperialistic Tendencies.
As I have told Before - it's FUN for you, thats because you are still young and looking for your true Identitiy.
And the numerous soliders and sailors, that you have worked and lived with (as you said) have influenced so much on you, that you are interested in shooting. It's fun.
Actually - there are No winnder, just Loosers in Wars...
Yes, they are Chemical, but a "Little" bit MORE Poisonous then ANY other Chemical,
just because it is taken from a material, that is SEVERLY radiated in the start. If you think that it is SOOOO innocent, why don't you go practice some shooting with DU ammunition?
So, when they are discovered and Hiding in civilan clothing among the rest of the population, aren't they the SAME as the Terrorists you so much hate?
Aren't they using the same Tactic of "Hiding among the Civilans"? So, why can they do it? Hypochrisy? Again?
Only two of them CAUGHT - how many are right now "On Mission"? Or How many times BEFORE were there SAS agents like that "On Mission"?
I read several articles and not "what resistance tells me". I am not in direct "contact" with them you know? I like to read Reuters, because I find they present the Facts without any hesitation. I also read alot of Slovenian newspapers, that tend to be more non-biased then any western news. I also like the Guardian and Independant.
No they Can't.
Do US Forces "ASk of ID's" when they role in their Convoy on the Streets of Baghdad and open Fire at ANYBODY that come closer then 150 meters?
What For YOU defineces a "Terrorist"? An Arabic speaing Male with a Beard and a Towel on his head?
Well if Ownership of weapons is legal in Iraq, then Civilans can also have their Rifles and Pistols, right?
Soldiers also follow orders, and if they had an order to shoot you, they would.
That's all they know - follow orders.
From the Top General, that has to listen to the Supreme Commander to the Private 1st class that has to listen to his Sargeant.
Actually You and me only Know what they tell us - and BELIVE me, they know alot More and do not wan't to share with the people.
AWwwwwwwwwww. Just makes me wan't to Cry! Your Army Buddies can't play with thier Toys anymore because they are old and they need new ones?
BUhuhuhuHUHUU! You feel Inferior if you have less Destroyers then China?
China is BIG, UK is not. But that's why Blair is so EAGER to help the US president in this alleged "War on Terror", because it brings Money to the Defence Budget.
Wars are GOOD for the Army. Wars are GOOD for the Economy. Wars are GOOD for the Empire.
Not as Bad as DU...
How many Nuclear Warheads were actually Dropped in the Armed Conflicts?
Two? How many TONS od Depleted Uranium were dropped on Iraq?
Read This:
The Geiger counter carried by a visiting reporter starts singing when it nears a DU bullet fragment no bigger than a pencil eraser. It registers nearly 1,000 times normal background radiation levels on the digital readout.
Despite the troops' bulldozing of contaminated earth away from the burnt vehicles, black piles of pure DU ash and particles are still present at the site. The toxic residue, if inhaled or ingested, is considered by scientists to be the most dangerous form of DU.
One pile of jet-black dust yielded a digital readout of 9,839 radioactive emissions in one minute, more than 300 times average background levels registered by the Geiger counter. Another pile of dust reached 11,585 emissions in a minute.
The depleted-uranium bullets are made of low-level radioactive nuclear-waste material, left over from the making of nuclear fuel and weapons. It is 1.7 times as dense as lead, and burns its way easily through armor. But it is controversial because it leaves a trail of contamination that has half-life of 4.5 billion years - the age of our solar system.
www.csmonitor.com...
In three separate interviews a U.S. Special Operations Command Colonel admitted that the U.S. and Great Britain fired 500 tons of D.U. munitions into Iraq.
He also admitted that privately the Pentagon has acknowledged the health hazards of D.U. for years.
He asked to remain unnamed for obviously apparent safety reasons, and so that he may remain a valuable source of information. (I will admit that I will jealously guard his identity to keep him as a source.)
www.scoop.co.nz...
Yes they do.
You do?
This one is for all Young Boys, that wanna be Soldiers!
[edit on 18/10/05 by Souljah]
Originally posted by devilwasp
You realise I feel heart broken everytime one of our lads die , I support the war but frankly I dont like it.
I am not as "young or inexperieced" as you may think but heh thats your opinion.
Wow I didnt know that france , germany and spain suddenly had troops in iraq!
I didnt know the UK wasnt a big ally nor did I know that france or germany NEEDED to be part of a war before it became "good" but heh ofcourse if germany was part of the Coalition I have no doubt there would be "fourth riech" statements made...
No we fought for the oil that was ours around it AND the people that lived there AND because it belongs to us.
The UK didnt need to invade, it was already there....
How can you become independant from something with that something being part of your culture?
Just remember, the MOD has the ability to decimate many of the smaller countries in the EU and around the world but we havent...
I know men and women who arent military that enjoy shooting, hell my old coach was a woman who worked as a sub contractor for the MOD and she could shoot better than some snipers..
Not really, these "soldiers and sailors" I've lived with have influenced me because I grew up with them as cadets and friends but they choose thier own careers and I choose to go shooting by myself, long before I joined the cadets I was interested in weapons.
I dont think its sooooo inocent, I am saying its just another weapon, just as dangerous to life as any other.
1) SAS men dont hide amongst civilians, they go and seek out enemy who are hiding amognst civilians.
Probably hundreds of MOD and BRITISH INTELLIGENCE agents are "on mission" watching the enemy.
Intelligence services dont fight the enemy, why? Because the best weapon they can use IS intelligence.
You ever read navy news?
Ever read the BBC?
Actually they do, if you didnt notice thats what the sling on a rifle is for...
You keep it at low ports hold it with one hand and check I'ds with the other, if its bad you can bring the rifle up quickly and have a weapon trained at the enemy in seconds.
BTW, not all terrorists come from the middle east.
Who is "they"?
The government?
The INTEL agencies?
Uh yeah considering we had the worlds biggest navy less than 7 decades ago.
We spend 8% of our GDP on defence, thats not alot.
Wars are not good, the best way to win is with out any fighting.
Sun Tzu said that but in a diffrent way and I would qoute him if I hadnt left my book at home..
Yet again, is this about numbers or is this about human rights?
No they dont.
Oh wooohoo anti war posters! Yay lets all buy one and help the slave trade!
Originally posted by Souljah
You support the war?
And you know that by Supporting the war you are also supporting your Lads to go and die? You can't see this, right? If you would REALLY care for your Lads, you would be against it and you would not want this Nightmare to go on for anymore!
I support the war because it was the right course of action to take, sometimes the right call isnt the right call.
If the lads die I'm sorry for them I feel angry against those that killed them but I still support what they fight for and what they believe in.
Who said that they do?
Sadly it's like this: Blair is Bush's lapdog and he will do as told. That's why your Lads are dying in downtown Basra - 'coz Bush told them to go.
Hmmmm... I Wonder if Saddam was thinking like that too when he Invaded Kuwait....
Yes - but I think that the United Yugoslavia was much better then what we have Today.
Now THAT is Imperialistic Thinking!
See? She was also in connection with Soliders, the Military and the Ministry of Defence.
Ok - whatever you say Lad. I am sure that if you lived with a bunch of Young Medicine Students, that you would be a Med student now - but hey, that's just my Opinion...
No it is NOT just another Weapon!
Go to Fallujah and take out the Geiger counter and start watching how crazy it will go. Facts ARE that US and UK forces dropped thousands of Tons of this Material on Iraq, not caring for the Enviroment, civilan Iraqi people and their own Soldiers.
But driving in a civilan car with civilan clothing in the midldle if Iraq on the road with other civilan cars, IS hiding among civilans.
If they would suddenly be stopped in a traffic jam, and they would be shot at, alot of civilans, around them, would die, right?
Have you ever heard of Black Ops?
When Intelligence uses their special Agents for some Clandestine Terrorism?
Setting up bombs? Assassination people? No? You think they just "gather intel"? PLEASE! It's WAR!
I don' think the Navy News can offer me any information that I would find useful, just because it would be full of pride for the UK and hate for the "terrorists".
BBC is better, but still much like Sky News - both under heavy influence of USA.
Yes, that's what the Manual says. The Pratice is ALWAYS much different then the Theory in the Manual.
Agreed - some come from the White House and from Downing Street....
All of them?
So you do miss your Empire, huh? Miss your Biggest Navy and all the great stuff it brings when you Control the Seven Seas? But now the US Navy is the Biggest in the World and THEY patrol the Seas and all you can do, is Jump when they say How High!
Agreed - that't not alot, compared to the the percentage of the US Defence Budget, that is somehow SCARY!
I like Sun Tzu also - I know what you ment:
Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting.
It's about Both! It's about the Nature that this "Case" is handeled by the Military - like Nothing happened, while DU is poisoning their own Soliders, the innocent civilans and the enviroment! But they simply do not care, just because it is NOT happening in their Backyard, but in a place far, FAR away, somewhere in the Desert.
Yes they do.
Slave Trade?
"We cannot accept that there can be free democratic elections in a country under foreign military occupation".
Originally posted by Jakomo
War creates fascism. The army is not designed as a democracy, it is put together as a fascist entity. You don't ask questions, you do what you are told for the good of the "corps". If you don't or if you question your orders, it's either the brig or the firing squad.
If you're for war, you're for fascism, it's pretty simple.
Originally posted by Jakomo
If you're for war, you're for fascism, it's pretty simple.
Originally posted by Souljah
Well first of all, I am not that Naive as the Majority of the People - especially your kind ones. You would eat everything that your goverment serves you. I don't.
I have seen quiet a few documentaries and have read quiet a few books on that topic and I am sure that it was not a work of some crazed muslim terrorists.
And it goes hand in hand with your presidents agenda of World Domination - so ofcourse he will "burn down his Reichstag".
It Does? Really? Well MOST of this Planet does not Share your Opinion. Especially during this administration, which has proven numerous times that HUMANITY is something unknown to them.
Why is the Military Budget record high, justl like in the days of Cold War? Care to explain that?
You bet its bad if you are Illegaly Invading other countries for corporate interersts. Hitler had that Idea once too - he called it the THIRD REICH. One People. One State. One Leadership. One Empire.
Yea, when you can't find any more Excuses - use the word TERRORISM. You are so predictable - like your monkey of a president.
And while you Rant about how "War on Terrorism" is GOOD for Mankind, warprofiteers get richer and they take the dollar from your pockets into theirs. Are you getting filthy rich right now? The problem here is, the the MAIN Tyrannt is your president and his corporate friends that create wars in order to make profit. Perod.
You sound like those Porch-Masons here on the Board, yelling all the time the word "PROOF!PROOF!PROOF!" - kind of Pathetic.
I have given you 3 links, and none of them for you is Good Enough. Its funny, because you would not find ANY of my links or statements as Proof, simply because I have showed them to you.
Yes we did. We put up a Great Fight, but you wouln't know anything about it anyway. Wait a minute! Did you say BOOK? You actually READ Books? No Way!
"Fascism should be called CORPORATIVISM, because it is the merge of the State and the Corporation!"
Sound Familiar? *cough*Halliburton*cough*
Remember that old Lady that was so brutally disarmed by the Guards in New Olreans? Her Rights were trampeled on faster then you can say "G'Day!". What makes you think that they will "Skip" your doorbell? Because you are a diehard republican?
Bottom line is that these New Great Sonars KILL THEM and the Navy does not care at all - like yourself. Will maybe an Article from make this story more "real" for your delicate senses?
No more rainforrest, no more mankind. Simple. What will you BREATH? Canned Air? Geez.
Works for Huamnity?
“Pretty simple?” Based upon........
Rather more of an ‘oversimplified’ statement on your behalf.
1) a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
2) : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control