It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Majed Hamid was detained by the US military more than three weeks ago along with several other men at the funeral of a relative.
"Al-Arabiya is distressed by the fact that the US military's authority in Iraq is placing itself in direct conflict with international laws and regulations pertaining to the detaining of journalists for prolonged periods without being officially charged, and denying them legal counsel," said the channel in a statement on Thursday.
"This is against the clearly expressed wishes and demands of various internationally renowned media freedom groups, such as IFJ, CPJ and Reporters Without Borders," the statement added.
"Al-Arabiya holds the relevant authorities responsible for the safety and security of its journalist in Iraq.
"The channel also holds the same authority responsible for the journalists' inability to pursue their professional duty satisfactorily for the absence of an environment conducive to accurate and comprehensive reporting."
Hamid, who is the youngest Iraqi TV journalist in US custody in his country, also worked on a freelance basis for the Reuters news agency.
The Pentagon is silent as the U.S. military imprisons local journalists
Much has been said about what is and is not being reported in Iraq, but one thing is clear: Local, front-line journalists are not only risking their lives, they are risking imprisonment for their work.
Ali Omar Abrahem al-Mashhadani, a 36-year-old freelance cameraman and photographer who worked for the Reuters news agency in Ramadi, was taken from his home on August 8 during a general sweep of his neighborhood by U.S. Marines. His family says the Marines were suspicious of photos he stored in his cameras. He was sent to Baghdad’s Abu Ghraib prison, held without charge, and denied access to his family and a lawyer.
www.cpj.org...
Originally posted by jsobecky
How do we learn what is going on there? I don't know, but I'm not so sure we have some inherent right to know everything. We don't know what is going on in an an operating room, or in every corporate board meeting, or in that bank customer's checkbook who is ahead of us in line.
Originally posted by jsobecky
I never was a big fan of embeds, anyway.
Originally posted by cargo
Im not hung up on anything. You listed examples that were privately funded, as if they are the same as a war in the names of the citizens who fund it.
Originally posted by Souljah
The Problem here is that the Majority of the Journalists Killed are NOT Embedded with US Armed Forces or are in Contract with Pentagon. They are Independant and thats why they are also the Targets of the US Military. Why? Because they want to actually REPORT what is going on in Iraq and not say what the Army tells them to. I guess Pentagon really does not like that...
Originally posted by Bikereddie
So what about the photos that i have in my possession? They are not part part of the US Armed forces, nor could they be classed as such. I guess they could be construed as independent.
Therefore i guess that makes me a target then?
Originally posted by Heartagram
Something to add here, do you know that a Journalist and any CIA/MI6/KGB/MOSSAD/Secret Agent of a particular agency is very very similar in some many ways?
I can think of no closer comparison to a spy than a journalist in a war zone.
Originally posted by jsobecky
I can think of no closer comparison to a spy than a journalist in a war zone.
A recent post showed how spies are handled by the insurgents:
NEWS: Beheading Of Two Iraqi Spies For US Military Released On Internet.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Why should this person be treated differently?
Originally posted by Souljah
Originally posted by Bikereddie
So what about the photos that i have in my possession? They are not part part of the US Armed forces, nor could they be classed as such. I guess they could be construed as independent.
Therefore i guess that makes me a target then?
If you mean the Photos taken by Yours Son, then I bet the Army checked your son's camera for Pictures that they do not want the World to see. Or maybe they didn't, and thats why there is the new Law in the US Army saying that NO PHOTOS are to be taken in the Army. Your son is still a Soldier and he still has to Answer to the Army First. The Independant Journalist doesn't. His JOB is to get the story and bring it to us.