Remote Behavioral Influence Technology Evidence

John J. McMurtrey, M. S. , Copyright 2003, 8/12/03


People who perceive remote manipulation by described technology have formed protest organizations across the world. Educated society is uninformed regarding authentic documentation of the development and existence of such technologies, and unaware of the dangers. Complaint of ‘hearing voices’ and perception of other remote manipulation, must receive appropriate scientific and legal investigation with protection. Ignorance among professionals is virtually complete with eminent texts and opinion demonstrably presumptions regarding complaints of some victims.

Herein is substantiated:

1. Human wireless internal voice transmission and tracking technologies.
2. Reports of electroencephalographic (EEG) thought reading capacity, evidence of covert development, and remote EEG capture technology.
3. References to the use of these or similar technologies against humans.

MICROWAVE HEARING

Allan H. Frey was the first American to publish on the microwave hearing effect in 1962, yet radar technicians had anecdotes of microwave perception in World War II. Deaf and normal subjects, even with earplugs, can hear appropriately pulsed microwaves at least up to thousands of feet from the transmitter. Control by the subject of the radiofrequency to drive the acoustic amplifier produced sound most similar to normal. However high frequency sound is relatively lacking. Transmitter parameters above the effect produce a severe buffeting of the head with dizziness and nausea, while parameters below the effect induce a pins and needles sensation. Peak power is the major determinant of loudness, though this had some dependence on pulse width. Pulse modulation appears to influence pitch and timbre. The effect “is the most easily and reliably replicated of low power density (microwave) illumination.” Review of animal microwave hearing confirmation by independent investigators establishes validity.
Discovery of “recieverless” and “wireless” voice transmission at Walter Reed Army Institute of Research is by Sharp and Grove, while working for the Advanced Research Projects Agency. Their method was simple: the negative deflections of voiceprints from recorded spoken numbers were caused to trigger microwave pulses. Upon illumination by such verbally modulated energy, the words were understood remotely. That the discovery’s applications are “obviously not limited to therapeutic medicine” was apparent to James C. Lin in Microwave Auditory Effects and Applications.
A Defense Intelligence Agency review of Communist literature affirmed microwave sound and indicated voice transmission. States the report: “Sounds and possibly even words which appear to be originating intracranially (within the head) can be induced by signal modulation at very low average power densities.” Among microwave weapon implications are “great potential for development into a system for disorientating or disrupting the behavior patterns of military or diplomatic personnel.” Assessment by the Army Mobility Equipment Research and Development Command affirms microwave speech transmission with applications of “camouflage, decoy, and deception operations.” “One decoy and deception concept presently being considered is to remotely create noise in the heads of personnel by exposing them to low power, pulsed microwaves . . . By proper choice of pulse characteristics, intelligible speech may be created” quotes the report.
The Brunkan Patent # 4877027 “Hearing system” is a device capable of verbal microwave hearing. The invention converts speech for remote introduction into the head by parabolic antenna with direct neural influence, and nerve dead –deaf efficacy. The microwave spectrum granted is broad: 100-10,000 MHz (0.1-10 GHz.) Pulse characteristics are essential to perception. Bursts of narrowly grouped, evenly spaced pulses determine sound intensity by their amount per unit time. Although a wide spectrum is claimed by the patent with ranges of pulse and burst duration, preferred operation has burst duration at 2 microseconds, and pulse duration at 100 nanoseconds. Operation is at 1000 MHz, which is the frequency of optimal tissue penetration. Another patent application based on microwave bursts is “designed in such a way that the burst frequencies are at least virtually equal to the sound frequencies of the sounds picked up by the microphone,” though the transducer here is unremote.
Stocklin Patent # 4858612 “Hearing device” 7 affirms the microwave hearing effect with remedy of auditory nerve and cortex deafness. Stocklin gives exposition to the concept that a microwave component is part of neurophysiology and electroencephalogram (EEG) potentials. Microwaves are considered both emitted and absorbed by nerve cell membrane proteins. Microwaves generally excite the brain perhaps by influencing calcium, which is central for nerve firing. The auditory cortex normally produces microwave energy, which the device simulates, thus eliciting sound sensation. Each acoustic tone is weighted for several microwave frequencies by a formula called the mode matrix, which is used to calculate best perception requirements. Observation of EEG desynchronization, delta waves, and brain wave amplitudes helps calibrate the device to an individual. The lowest frequency for hearing is estimated by the cephalic index. Microwave speech transmission is here unremote with the antenna over and sized for the auditory cortex. Other patents have non-remote transducers of radiowave elicited hearing.
“Communicating Via the Microwave Auditory Effect.” titles a small business contract for the Department of Defense. Communication initial results are: “The feasibility of the concept has been established” using both low and high power systems. A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request as to the project’s outcome met with denial on the part of the Air Force, on the grounds that disclosure “could reasonably be expected to cause damage to national security.” Though the FOIA disclosure was denied, such an award’s purpose is elaborated in the Air Force’s “New World Vistas” report: “It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction . . . . If a pulse stream is used, it should be possible to create an internal acoustic field in the 5-15 kilohertz range, which is audible. Thus it may be possible to ‘talk’ to selected adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them.”
The above Army efforts had results. A microwave voice transmission non-lethal weapon is referenced in the thesaurus of the Center for Army Lessons Learned, which is a military instruction website. Neuro-electromagnetic designation is compatible with Stocklin’s mechanism. The military thesaurus entry lists similar devices using “silent sound.”

ULTRASOUND TRANSMISSION OF VOICE

Internal voice capability is also evident in ultrasound-based technology without nearby discernment. Lowrey Patent # 6052336 “Apparatus and method of broadcasting audible sound using ultrasonic sound as a carrier” clearly focuses on non-lethal weapon application against crowds or as directed at an individual. Communication is understood as an inner voice with loss of the directional quality of sound perception. The following quote appears as an effect on people: “Since most cultures attribute inner voices either as a sign of madness, or as messages from spirits or demons, both of which . . . evoke powerful emotional reactions.” Replaying speech, with a delay impedes talking and causes stuttering. Nearly or below audible sound (infrasound) causes unease, increases suggestibility, with nausea and malaise from higher intensity. More power produces organ damage. Normal brain wave patterns can be changed (or entrained), which “may cause temporary incapacitation, intense feelings of discomfort.” This technique is detailed by Monroe Patent # 5356368 “Method of and apparatus for inducing desired states of consciousness”, with license to Interstate Industries and involves an auditory replication of brainwave patterns to entrain the EEG as desired.
Norris Patent # 5889870 “Acoustic heterodyne device and method”, directionally produces sound on interference (or heterodyning) of two ultrasound beams. This process becomes apparent particularly within cavities such as the ear canal. Communication is readily understood by an individual across a noisy crowed room without nearby discernment. Sound can also be produced from mid-air or as reflecting from any surface. Noted is nausea and disorientation on ultrasound localization of low frequency noxious vicinity. American Technology Corporation licensed the patent, has an acoustic non-lethal weapons technology, a development agreement with the Army, with the military being the fastest growing part of their business, and lists non-lethal weapons significantly in their annual report. A popular magazine writer describes the device’s sound perception inner nature. From separate references, non-lethal weapons treatments affirm sound localization and individual ultrasound effect limitation with obvious lack of nearby discernment; the latter by a non-lethal weapons program director. Both the ultrasound patents are based on ultrasound cancellation by interference leaving the carried audible sound perceivable. Other acoustic influence methods may utilize ultrasound.

TARGET TRACKING TECHNOLOGY

These Internal voice capable energy forms penetrate obstruction and can be localized. Commonly experienced is sound transmission through enclosures. An inaudible ultrasound high intensity carrier wave is unnoticed. Solid defect inspection is one use of ultrasound, which is being developed to discern movement through walls. Common technology utilizes the microwave hearing spectrum, which contains partially or wholly cell phone, TV, and radar frequencies. Commercial signals are unperceived, since the hearing effect requires specific pulsation limits. A variety of antennas localize this structurally penetrating illumination with collimation or focusing. A patent, “compatible for mobile platforms with DEWs,” (Directed Energy Weapons) includes a modified Luneburg lens emitting parallel rays with over 50 years utilization.
Hablov Patent # 5448501 “Electronic life detection system” is microwave radar within the hearing spectrum that, through obstruction, not only finds, but also differentiates individuals. Therein is stated: “the modulated component of the reflected microwave signal . . . subjected to frequency analysis . . . forms a type of “electronic fingerprint“ of the living being with characteristic features, which . . . permits a distinction between different living beings.” Though this patent has use in trapped victim rescue, another Hablov et. al. Patent # 5530429 “Electronic surveillance system” detects interlopers with security emphasis.
The Hablov et. al. patents discern people thru structures apparently by vital organ motion, but others offer full imaging. Fullerton et. al. Patent # 6400307 “System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array” is such a design. More within structure imaging designs are: a portable system determining suspect distance, and International Society for Optical Engineering presentations.
The acquisition, locking onto, and tracking of human targets is described by Rowan Patent # 4893815 “Interactive transector device commercial and military grade.” Stated therein: “Potentially dangerous individuals can be efficiently subdued, apprehended and appropriately detained.” The capability of “isolating suspected terrorists from their hostages . . . or individuals within a group without affecting other members of the group” is stated. Laser, radar, infrared, and acoustic sensor fusion is utilized to identify, seek, and locate targets. Locking illumination upon the target until weapons engagement accomplishes tracking. Among available non-lethal weapons is an incapacitating electromagnetic painful pulse. The British Ministry of Defense Logistics Organization lists a Man-Portable Surveillance & Target Acquisition Radar with ability to track men.
A track initiation processor acquires a target, while a data association filter maintains a tracking lock on the target. An original method for target tracking is the Kalman filter. Numerous weapons guidance examples utilize similar processes and illuminate targets for tracking. Laser illumination is also for other targets than humans. Other examples utilize microwave beam target recognition and weapons guidance. Target illumination tracking systems have nanosecond to microsecond response times. Such responses require no wide scan area to lock illumination upon persons at achievable speeds. At 90 miles per hour an auto travels less than 1/100 of an inch in a microsecond. Internal voice illumination device construction has long been feasible to competent engineering efforts that would produce many existing complaints

THOUGHT READING CAPACITY

Many people who have complaint of remote behavioral influence also perceive mind reading capacity. Thought reading capacity, or brain wave analysis word recognition is seriously reported. Publications by a Stanford group support recognition of words from brain waves, with recent enhanced success. Other investigators publish above chance magnetoencephalographic (MEG) word recognition. EEG instant detection in syllables of “a content of category which the testee whishes to speak” quotes Kiyuna et. al. Patent # 5785653 “System and method for predicting internal condition of live body.” A stated use: “the present invention may be use (sic) to detect the internal condition of surveillance in criminal investigation.” NEC Corporation licensed this patent. Remote EEG communication with Armed Forces or clandestine application is the cited use for Mardirossian Patent # 6011991 “Communication system and method including brain wave analysis and/or use of brain activity.” Technology Patents, LLC licensed the patent, which proposes transmitter capable skin implants, and utilizes neural networks (artificial intelligence.) Publications unreferenced by current papers are a US technical report of prior results from Stanford comparable to the recent articles, dated 1975, and an apparent Russian report before 1981. The direction of robots by detecting mental states such as imagining raising the directionally appropriate arm or spinning cubes is reported. Emotion differentiation by EEG is also patented, referencing Air Force research.
Theoretical framework for EEG word recognition reports based on the activation of brain cell assemblies is elaborated for extensive publications of averaged EEG word category differentiation, also consistent with word recognition. EEG differentiation of words rated as to affective meaning such as good-bad, strong-weak, or active-passive is reported. Based on EEG/MEG responses, words are readily distinguished from non-words, or pictures, can be differentiated as to length, and visual nouns can be differentiated from action verbs. Brain wave patterns distinguish proper names from common nouns, animal names from numerals, or content from function words. Concrete versus abstract words, and unambiguous versus ambiguous noun/verbs have distinctive EEG patterns. Face, arm, or leg action verbs are reported distinguished by brain waves as well.
The research arm of agencies with missions to covertly acquire information would certainly complete any technologic thought reading potential. Assertions that such development has progressed are multiple, and two are confirmed by the 1975 report, which itself is evidence of development covert to open databases. An International Committee of the Red Cross Symposium synopsis states EEG computer mind reading development by Lawrence Pinneo in 1974 at Stanford. A letter by the Department of Defense Assistant General Counsel for Manpower, Health, and Public Affairs, Robert L. Gilliat in 1976 affirmed brain wave reading by the Advanced Research Projects Agency. “Thought reading or ‘synthetic telepathy’” communications technology procurement is considered in a 1993 Jane’s Special Operations Forces (SOF) article: “One day, SOF commandos may be capable of communicating through thought processes.” Descriptive terms are “’mental weaponry’ and ‘psychic warfare’” Although contemplated in future context, unlikely is complete development solely for Special Forces, and availability of a technology not fully adapted to troop level Special Forces requirements is implied.
In 1976 the Malech Patent # 3951134 “Apparatus and method for remotely monitoring and altering brain waves” was granted. Given operation example is 100 and 210 MHz; frequencies penetrating obstruction. Remote delineations are: “The individual components of the system for monitoring and controlling brain wave activity may be of conventional type commonly employed in radar”; and “The system permits medical diagnosis of patients, inaccessible to physicians, from remote stations.” License is to Dorne & Margolin Inc., but now protection is expired with public domain. The Malech patent utilizes interference of 210 and 100 MHz frequencies resulting in a 110 MHz return signal, which is demodulated to give EEG waveform.
The capability of remote EEG is predicted by electromagnetic scattering theory using ultrashort pulses. Ultrashort pulses are currently defined in the range of 10-12 to 10-15 second. Considering that EEG word elicited potentials are comparatively long (100s of milliseconds), has relevance to remote radar EEG capture adequate to word recognition, with ultrashort pulses allowing some 109 or more radar reflections in a millisecond (10-3 sec.)
The possibility of impressing an ‘experience set’ on an individual by ultrashort pulses is also contemplated.104 The above patent alters brain waves, and microwave non-lethal weapon brain wave disruption and behavioral change including unconsciousness are known.
The above EEG telemetry patent and ultrashort pulse method are by active radar probe. Yet a passive field extends as far as 12 feet from man as detected by a cryogenic antenna. A publication maintains this device as entirely adaptable to clandestine applications, and pointedly comments on the disappearance of physiological remote sensing literature since the 1970’s for animals and humans, while all other categories of remote sensing research greatly expanded. Complete rejection of assertions of a remote mind reading capability is just as arrogantly presumptuous, in the face of complaints, as has been the dismissal of internal voice capacity.

LEGAL AND INTERNATIONAL REFERENCES TO BEHAVIORAL INFLUENCE TECHNOLOGIES

References to behavioral influence weapon use by government bodies and international organizations are numerous. Negotiation submissions to the United Nations Committee on Disarmament affirm the reality of infrasound (directed by ultrasound) and microwave weapon nervous system effects. European Parliament passage of resolutions calling for conventions regulating non-lethal weapons and the banning of “weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings” includes neuro-influence capability. A resolution relates to HAARP, High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project, which has environmental consequences, and although utilizing high frequency, ionospheric extra low frequencies (ELF) emanation results. Since ELF is within brain wave frequencies the project has capacity to influence whole populations Development of such capacity was predicted by President Carter’s National Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski. Nature News reports concern by a French government panel about the potential for thought reading and such a remote capacity. An American draft law prohibiting land, sea, or space-based weapons using electromagnetic, psychotronic, (behavioral influence) and sound technologies “directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control” has not yet passed. Russian electromagnetic standards are nearly 1000 times lower than the American, so their weapon law forbidding electromagnetic weapons exceeding Health Department parameters is strict. The Russian draft law explicitly references behavioral influence non-lethal weapons, their capabilities, and development in several countries. Resolutions by the International Union of Radio Science recognize criminal use of electromagnetic technology, though largely relevant to use against infrastructure.

MICROWAVE AND ULTRASOUND USE AGAINST HUMANS

The American Embassy in Moscow microwave irradiation received little publicity until the winter 1976 protective screening instillation, but irradiation was known since 1953. Original frequencies were 2.56-4.1 GHz with additional intermittent 0.6-9.5 GHz signals being permanent by 1975 in a wide band frequency hopping consistent pattern with one signal pulsating. The irradiation was directional from nearby buildings and modulated. Soviet complaint had no avail, but the signals disappeared in January 1979 “reportedly as a result of a fire in one or more of the buildings.” A 9-11 GHz signal recurred in 1988. Observed frequencies are basically within the microwave hearing spectrum, and pulsation is required. Psychiatric cases occurred during the exposure period, though no epidemiologic relationship was revealed with fully a quarter of the medical records unavailable.121 The CIA had Dr. Milton Zaret review medical Soviet microwave literature to determine the irradiation purpose. He concluded the Russians “believed the beam would modify the behavior of the personnel.” In 1976 the post was declared unhealthful and pay raised 20%.101
The most documented citizen microwave irradiation was of peace protesters at Greenham Common American Air Force Base in Berkshire England who prompted unusual symptom investigation. Radiation measurements exhibited microwaves with symptom experience up to a hundred times the background level, and rose sharply on protests nearer the base.122 Symptoms became pronounced on cruise missile transport, a protest focus.122 Recorded were wide ranging complaints: skin burns; ‘severe’ headaches; drowsiness; temporary paralysis; incoordinated speech; two late (5 mos.) spontaneous abortions; an apparent circulatory failure; and unlike usual menstrual synchronization, irregular or postmenopausal menstruation. The symptom complex fits well with electromagnetic exposure syndrome.122 It has also been reported that some of the women ‘heard voices.’ The base closed finally in 1991.
Criminal directed energy weapon use has report in Germany. In a number of cases there is similarity of circumstances, complaints, and symptoms. In at least one case microwave fields have been measured with exclusion of the usual sources (cell phone towers, etc.) Plans for construction of a crude device from a microwave oven are sold.126
Ultrasound behavioral influence technology use in Northern Ireland is described. The device could focus on one person; utilized ultrasound cancellation like those patented, was employed in Vietnam by the Americans, and is known as the squawk box. Mentioned infrasound frequency (ultrasound carrier directed) is like Loos 1/25/00 patent, with psychological effects summarized as ‘spooky.’ More detail is: “When the two frequencies mix in the human ear they become intolerable. Some people exposed to the device are said to feel giddy or nauseous and in extreme cases they faint. Most people are intensely annoyed by the device and have a compelling wish to be somewhere else.” British police inventories list the specific device, though a spokesman denied use.122
Sophisticated behavioral influence capability is confirmed by ex-intelligence officers. Julianne McKinney, Director of The National Security Alumni Electronic Surveillance Project is prominent. This is a largely classified employee victim study with internal voice transmission avowal.
The logic in the prediction by Brzezinski of the appearance of a more controlled and directed society dominated by a power elite willing to use the latest modern techniques for influencing behavior unhindered by liberal democratic values is compelling.114 Potential behavioral influence targets are multiple. Since those supposedly expert regard a victim’s perceptions as psychotic, all complaints are disregarded, not to mention capability to bear witness. Targets may include anyone worth neutralization: persons witnessing serious improprieties; security risks, which may only comprise classified disclosures; those prone to committing advantageous felonies; and domestic adversaries. Internal voice technology is most applicable within the same language and culture. Space here limits more than mentions of remote EEG influence capacity or footnote to remote subliminal technique. Subliminal message presentation represents a particularly insidious means of influencing thought, mood, behavior, and undermining civil liberties.
Most complainants allege government element involvement or contractors thereof among certain private companies. Remote behavioral influence research has long been funded by the US, with evidence of development14 17 28 37 and weapons,38 39 31 36 42 though denying on national security grounds project results29 and foreign literature analyses. Some 30 countries evidence active behavioral influence weapon research.
Though there has been some scant correct psychoanalytical acknowledgement, current medical awareness ensures effective neutralization of the afflicted. Not all those affected are stigmatized. However phenomena of ‘hearing voices’, perception of remote manipulation, or mind reading, when recounted to health professionals results in various diagnoses dependent on disability, totally without investigation. Mandatory is determination of relevant fields around complainants, or abatement by proven shielding of such phenomena. Professional opinions formed without excluding these technologies are negligent.
The longstanding and either identical or similar complaint to that here delineated as known technologic capacity by numerous victims indicts the presumption and deficient scholarship evident in the pertinent medical literature. In addition, microwave bioeffects have considerable congruence with reported major psychosis symptoms fully unrelated to ’voices.’ All of society should be disturbed at the prospect of technologic induction of voice since the unaware subject would perceive such voices as his own natural thought.
Some may refuse complete scientific establishment in respect to mind reading capability, yet it is difficult to deny the level of substantiation for the possibility that such a remote thought reading capability exists. The logic that in the 30 years since the Pinneo work started, this capability has had full development is too sound to dismiss victim corroboration. Educated democracies should not be complacent at this prospect, given the potential for political control, and existence of a remote EEG method in the public domain.

Acknowledgements: Thanks are given to God for inspiration, a benefactor of Christians Against Mental Slavery for financial support, and to Dr. Paul Canner his suggestions.

All patents are printable from the U. S. Patent Office website.
EEG word recognition articles are printable thru Pubmed or as designated.
Each is free

REFERENCES :

Citizens Against Human Rights Abuse, Director, Cheryl Welsh, 915 Zaragoza Street, Davis, CA 95616, USA. Website at www.dcn.davis.ca.us...
Christians Against Mental Slavery, Secretary, John Allman, 98 High Street, Knaresbourough, N. Yorks HG5 0HN, United Kingdom.
Moscow Committee for the Ecology of Dwellings, Chairman, Emile Sergeevne Chirkovoi, Korpus 1006, Kvrtira 363, Moscow Zelenograd, Russia 103575, Russia.
International Movement for the Ban of Manipulation of the Human Nervous System by Technologic Means, Founder, Mojmir Babacek, P. O. Box 52, 51101 Turnov, Czech Republic, Europe. Website at www.geocities.com...
Presman AS. Electromagnetic Fields and Life Plenum, New York-London, 1970. Presman mentions Cazzimalli and another English reference to this Italian work is at www.datafilter.com... p 2., a semi-popular treatment with references.
Frey AH, “Human Auditory System response to modulated electromagnetic energy” J Applied Physiol 17 (4): 689-92, 1962. Also at www.raven1.net...
Stocklin PL. Patent #4858612 “Hearing device” USPTO granted 8/22/89.
Frey AH and Messenger R. “Human Perception of Illumination with Pulsed Ultrahigh-Frequency Electromagnetic Energy” Science 181: 356-8, 1973.
Eichert ES and Frey AH. “Human Auditory System Response to Lower Power Density Pulse Modulated Electromagnetic Energy: A Search for Mechanisms” J Microwave Power 11(2): 141, 1976.
Michaelson SM. “Sensation and Perception of Microwave Energy” In: Michaelson SM, Miller MW, Magin R, and Carstensen EL (eds.) Fundamental and Applied Aspects of Nonionizing Radiation Plenum Press New York, p 213-24, 1975.
Puranen L and Jokela K. “Radiation Hazards Assessment of Pulsed Microwave Radars” J Microwave Power Electromagn Energy 31(3): 165-77, 1996.
Hermann DM and Hossman K-A. “Neurological effects of microwave exposure related to mobile communication” J Neurol Sci 152: 1-14, 1997.
Lai H. “Neurological Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation” In: Lin JC (ed.) Advances in Electromagnetic Fields in Living Systems vol 1, Plenum, N Y & London, p 27-80, 1994.
Justesen DR. “Microwaves and Behavior” Am Psychologist, 392(Mar): 391-401, 1975. Excerpted reference at www.raven1.net...
Lin JC. Microwave Auditory Effects and Applications Thomas, Springfield Ill, p 176, 1978.
“Surveillance Technology, 1976: policy and implications, an analysis and compendium of materials: a staff report of the Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights of the Committee of the Judiciary. United States Senate, Ninety-fourth Congress, second session, p 1280, US GOV DOC Y 4.J 882:SU 7/6/976.
Oskar KJ. “Effects of low power microwaves on the local cerebral blood flow of conscious rats” Army Mobility Equipment Command Report,. # AD-A090426, 1980. Available form NASA Technical Reports. Abstract at www.raven1.net...
Brunkan WB. Patent #4877027 “Hearing system” USPTO granted 10/31/89.
Frey AH. “Behavioral Biophysics” Psychol Bull 63(5): 322-37, 1965.
Thijs VMJ. Application #WO1992NL0000216 “Hearing Aid Based on Microwaves” World Intellectual Property Organization Filed 1992-11-26, Published 1993-06-10. Also at www.delphion.com... , but not at US Patent Office.
Stocklin PL. and Stocklin BF. “Possible Microwave Mechanisms of the Mammalian Nervous System” T-I-T J Life Sci 9: 29-51, 1979.
Beason RC and Semm P. “Responses of neurons to an amplitude modulated microwave stimulus” Neurosci Lett 333: 175-78, 2002.
Adey WR. “Biological Effects of Low Energy Electromagnetic Fields On the Central Nervous System” NATO Advanced Study Institute on Advances in Biological Effects and Dosimetry of Low Energy Electromagnetic Fields Erice Italy, Plenum, p 359-391, 1981.
Shepherd GM. Neurobiology 2nd ed. Oxford Univ. Press, New York-Oxford, p146-7, 1988.
Bise W. “Low power radio-frequency and microwave effects on human electroencephalogram and behavior” Physiol Chem Phys 10(5): 387-98, 1978.
Puharich HK and Lawrence JL. Patent #3629521“Hearing systems” USPTO granted 12/21/71.
Flanagan GP. Patent #3393279 “Nervous System Excitation Device” USPTO granted 7/16/68.
Kohn B. “Communicating Via the Microwave Auditory Effect” Defense Department Awarded SBIR Contract # F41624-95-C9007, 1993. Also at es.epa.gov... & www.raven1.net...
Margo P. Cherney Freedom of Information Act Memorandum www.raven1.net...
Castelli CJ. “Questions Linger about Health Effects of DOD’s ‘Non-Lethal Ray’ Inside the Navy 14(12): 1-6, 2001. globalsecurity.org... & www.pjproject.org...
Center for Army Lessons Learned Thesaurus at call.army.mil...
Lowery OM. Patent #5159703 “Silent subliminal presentation system” USPTO granted 10/27/92.
Lowrey A. Patent #6052336 “Apparatus and method of broadcasting audible sound using ultrasonic sound as a carrier” USPTO granted 4/18/00.
Monroe RA. Patent #5356368 Method of and apparatus for inducing desired states of conscisousness” USPTO granted 10/18/94.
Norris EG. Patent #5889870 “Acoustic Heterodyne device and method” USPTO granted 3/20/99.
American Technology Corporation Announces Acoustic Non-Lethal Acoustical Weapon Technology for Military and Law Enforcement, press release of 10/30/01.
American Technology Corporation Announces Cooperative Research and Development Agreement with US Army, press release of 1/25/02.
American Technology Corporation Announces Expansion of Military Business at www.atcsd.com...
American Technology Corporation Annual Summary to Shareholders Press Release of 4/23/03 at www.atcsd.com...
Sparrow D. “Best of What’s New Grand Award Winner: Hypersonic Sound” Popular Science Dec p 94, 2002. Also at www.popsci.com...
Bunker RJ (ed.) Less-then-lethal Weapons: Reference Guidebook Los Angles Calif {National Law Enforcemnt and Corrections Technology, Western Region], 2000. Similar treatmen is Bunker RJ (ed.) “Nonlethal Weapons Terms and References” INSS Occasional Paper 15, USAF Institute for National Security Studies, USAF Academy, Colorodo at www.usafa.af.mil...
Alexander JB. Future War: Non-Lethal Weapons in Twenty-First-Century Warfare, St. Martin’s Press, New York, p. 101, 1999.
Loos HG. Patent #6017302 “Subliminal acoustic manipulation of nervous systems” USPTO granted 1/25/00.
Hunt A, Tillery C, and Wild N. “Through-the-Wall Surveillance Technologies” Corrections Today 63(4): 132-3, 2001. Also at www.ojp.gov...
Frey AH. “Headaches from Cellular Telephones: Are They Real and What Are the Implications” Environ. Health Perspect. 106(3): 101-3, 1998.
Lin JC, “Cellular Telephones and Their Effect on the Human Brain” Mob Comput and Comm Review, 3(3): 34-5, July, 1999. Also at www.eecs.uic.edu...
Nolan PJ, Fundaments of College Physics Wm. C. Brown: Dubuque, Iowa, Melbourne, Australia, Oxford England, p 716, 1993.
Reits BJ. Patent #5736966 “Adjustable microwave antenna” USPTO granted 4/7/98.
Maier G and Harrison D. Patent #5825554 “Lenses with a variable refraction index” USPTO granted 10/20/98.
Jasper LJ. Patent #6407708 “Microwave generator/radiator using photoconductive switching and dielectric lense” USPTO granted 6/18/02.
Hablov DV, Fisun OI, Lupichev LN, Osipov VV, Schestiperov VA, and Schimko R. Patent #5448501 ”Electronic life detection system” USPTO granted 9/5/95.
Hablov DV, Fisun OI, Lupichev LN, Osipov VV, Schestiperov VA, and Schimko R. Patent #5530429 “Electronic surveillance system” USPTO granted 6/25/96.
Fullerton LW and Richards JI. Patent #6400307 “System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array” USPTO granted 6/4/02.
Nacci P. “Radar-Based Through-the-Wall Surveillance System” National Law Enforcement and Corrections Center at www.raven1.net...
Ferris DD, “Microwave and millimeter-wave systems for wall penetration” SPIE Proceedings 3375: 269-79, 1998.
Frazier LM, “Surveillance through walls and other opaque materials” SPIE Proceedings 2497: 115-19, 1995.

Rowan L. Patent #4893815 “Interactive transector device commercial and military grade” USPTO granted 1/16/90.
Ministry of Defence, Defence Logistics Organisation (British) at

www.mod.uk...

Brookner E. Tracking and Kalman Filtering Made Easy Wiley, New York, 1998.

Tisdale GE and Lindemann HB. Patent #4497065 “Target recognition system enhanced by active signature measurements” USPTO granted 1/29/85.

Peralta EA and Reitz KM. Patent #4562439 “Imaging radar seeker” USPTO granted 12/31/85.
Ahlstrom LGW. Patent #4796834 “Method for combating of targets and projectile or missile for carrying out the method” USPTO granted 1/10/89.
Suppes P, Lu Z, and Han B. “Brain wave recognition of words” Proc Natl Acad Sci 94: 14965-69, 1997. Printable free online thru Pubmed or at

www.pnas.org...


Suppes P, Han B, and Lu Z. “Brain-wave recognition of sentences” Proc Natl Acad Sci 95: 15861-66, 1998. Printable free online thru Pubmed or at

www.pnas.org...


Suppes P, Han B, Epelboim J, and Lu Z. “Invariance of brain-wave representations of simple visual images and their names” Proc Natl Acad Sci 96: 14658-63, 1999. Printable free online thru Pubmed or at

www.pnas.org...

Suppes P, Han B, Epelboim J, and Lu ZL. “Invariance between subjects of brain wave representations of language” Proc Natl Acad Sci 96(22): 12953-8, 1999. Printable free online thru PubMed or at

www.pnas.org...

[Edited on 12-10-2003 by Creepy]

Too bad Nans is no longer around.

The concept of remote behavioral influence IMO doesn't necessarily require a technical means.

Doesn't require it at all. You can sit in your living room and influence Bush if you want.

Not that i'm for it or anything, but would it be so bad that a subliminal "ordinance" be used to completely eradication crime? If your not a criminal, you have nothing to worry about. Another thing, if you consider that hearing voices and seeing things is more than just hallucinations, then you must be willing to accept... other things. aside from that, not enough information is given. I am not a disbeliever, nor am I a debunker, I just... have questions

How does this have 3315 views and only 5 posts? Thats sounds strange to me. Anyways I am controlling the world with this technology and this thread will be terminated along with the people who've read this. MUHAHAHA! MUHAHAHA!

This is awesome, I've turned off the phone, canceled the internet, and I'm communicating this very post by way of my brainwaves, magnified by sticking my head in the microwave.

Truly astounding!

This thread only has 6 posts because it was too much information for most people to read.
I used to get complaints about that all the time.

Also, this "phenomena" is out of most people's reach.
Most people don't hear voices, don't perceive that their minds are being read, and don't have the means of conducting experiments, especially with potential lethal microwaves.

OK I have to go, wife needs the microwave to make breakfast.

I know this is happening because I know people who have experienced the effects for years.

What I want to know is, how can they make it stop? Is there some way to deflect it?

shadow eyes,

well tin foil hats are apparently good
unless you want to use a farady cage for added defence!

if as Bandit has correctly pointed out though the means of communicating being used are not using technological means, but rather using the method employed for such manipulation with mankind for millenia, i.e. consciousness or thought as the means well then you really had better make sure that your Aura is very strong.

have a search its all out there.

Of interest is a recent thread of mine on this topic. Apparently more and more people are hearing voices and its normal now!

ATSNN Story Hearing Voices Normal!

Kind Regards

Elf

[edit on 26-9-2006 by MischeviousElf]

Perhaps doing a pentagram banishing every day will be some protection against remote influence... dunno

Either that or you create a servitor/thoughtform to protect you against it.

[edit on 26-9-2006 by TheBandit795]

That's the problem, this capability exists, and they use it against ordinary people, for whatever reason. As seen is several of the links above.

I am another, and live with this every day, but have another take. I have seen and obtained proof, enough for me, that telepathy exists and is being used to do all of the above, including harassment of individuals.

You can read up at www.govharass.com