It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"False witnesses are a dime a dozen in most cases."==Gaz (commentary, Roswell part II)
There are times when we truely see eye to eye.
"Does he once mention that Stan is a PHD Nuclear Physicist" ==Gaz
I would like to see a reference for that. (Other than testimony).
Does he state that the assertion of Roswell as a "myth" is "this reporter's opinion"? ==Gaz
Or maybe his staff noticed that Roswell matches the general characteristics of a "myth"
in Encyclopædia Britannica - myth
A symbolic narrative, usually of unknown origin and at least partly traditional, that ostensibly relates actual events and that
is especially associated with religious belief. It is distinguished from symbolic behaviour (cult, ritual) and symbolic places or
objects (temples, icons). Myths are specific accounts of gods or superhuman beings involved in extraordinary events.
Myths are not presented as fictitious or untrue.
The most obvious function of myths is the explanation of facts, whether natural or cultural.
A curio, also from Britannica.
U.S. Air Force report that proves the supposed U.F.O. landing in New Mexico was actually a crashed weather balloon.
Provides detailed proof to end the controversy about an alleged cover-up.
Assuming PJ's staff had only two possible sources to reference for their story, and they were directed to use a credible
source, which would they logically choose, ATS or Britannica ?
Originally posted by Gazrok
Still, we're talking a BSc, MSc degree, 14 years as a nuclear physicist with the likes of GE, GM, Westinghouse, McDonnell Douglas, etc. Literally, the man is a rocket scientist... (none of which was mentioned by Jennings)
But since Gaz now wants to change his
name specific charge, it is only fair to suggest that we have had a mis-trial in
favor of my client. Re-wording the charges is a bit too late. The defense
rested. When the prosecution levies a charge that is factually shown to be incorrect,
case dismissed, Jury dismissed, and PJ cant be tried twice for the same offense (no matter how
it is reworded).
Originally posted by nightwing
When the prosecution levies a charge that is factually shown to be incorrect,
case dismissed, Jury dismissed, and PJ cant be tried twice for the same offense (no matter how it is reworded).
Originally posted by nightwing
When facing a Kangaroo Court, what few options you can grasp are ALL you got to work with. Was his report biased ? Certainly not more than this court was.
"He put forth his OPINION as a stated fact" == Gaz
Let the first person on ATS who is without this sin cast the first stone.
"Let me ask you this , if Roswell didn't happen just as Jennings "Reports" , what was being discussed
"at every conference (the White House/Truman) had with the Military."? The Kennith Arnold sighing? I think not! == lost_shaman ( not to be confused with the member lost)
We could not agree more on that one.== nightwing