It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Even though the Freemasons want Masonry to be a part of the man's life and a part of his whole family's life (the social interaction part) I am not sure if I want to let my wife and kids know if I join. I don't want to be deceitful or lead a double-life, but I would like to have membership as a freemason be something that I keep quiet until a time of need. Or maybe I've misread things.
Originally posted by trinitrotoluene
He let me know that the Baphimet God of the OTO is not at all a part of Freemasonry. The official Freemasonry stance is that the OTO is a clandestine group and a breakaway from Freemasonry.
He also said anyone that is found to have joined the OTO gets the boot from Freemasonry. That came as QUITE a relief that the Freemasons are in ABSOLUTELY NO WAY sympathetic to the OTO.
Even though the Freemasons want Masonry to be a part of the man's life and a part of his whole family's life (the social interaction part) I am not sure if I want to let my wife and kids know if I join. I don't want to be deceitful or lead a double-life, but I would like to have membership as a freemason be something that I keep quiet until a time of need. Or maybe I've misread things.
Originally posted by trinitrotoluene
Even though the Freemasons want Masonry to be a part of the man's life and a part of his whole family's life (the social interaction part) I am not sure if I want to let my wife and kids know if I join. I don't want to be deceitful or lead a double-life, but I would like to have membership as a freemason be something that I keep quiet until a time of need. Or maybe I've misread things.
Originally posted by Cug
What's with the vrs stuff?
BTW the fellow you talked to wasn't that versed in the O.T.O. but really that's not unusual. as far as being members of both, that's no problem. In fact we have someone on this board who is a member of the O.T.O. and is a Mason.
Originally posted by No1tovote4
I thought a portion of the OTO ritual denied the existence of God or the importance of that existence. You cannot do that and be a Mason, they are incompatible.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
O.T.O. does not deny the existence of God, it only denies the existence of the common concept of God. O.T.O., which was primarily founded upon oriental mysticism, is Qabalistic and Pantheistic in nature. Like the eastern philosophers, most Thelemites consider God to be the sum total of the forces of nature. I am neither a member of O.T.O. nor a Thelemite, but can respect much, and even agree with some, of their tenets.
Originally posted by trinitrotoluene
Hey, all. Today I went down to the local freemasons' lodge so I could get some answers straight from the horse's mouth. It was pretty cool in there - they showed me around a little bit let me meet the head dude there - a 32rd Degree Mason in the Scottish Rite.
I let them know I was interested in joining, but I had my reservations after having learned about Crowley and his OTO. I asked if they followed any of the OTO practices, and he said "oh HEAVENS no! We don't do any of that stuff! They get into black magic and sex worship and stuff. That's NOW what we're about." He let me know that the Baphimet God of the OTO is not at all a part of Freemasonry. The official Freemasonry stance is that the OTO is a clandestine group and a breakaway from Freemasonry.
He also said anyone that is found to have joined the OTO gets the boot from Freemasonry. That came as QUITE a relief that the Freemasons are in ABSOLUTELY NO WAY sympathetic to the OTO.
I am not sure if I want to let my wife and kids know if I join. I don't want to be deceitful or lead a double-life, but I would like to have membership as a freemason be something that I keep quiet until a time of need. Or maybe I've misread things.
Originally posted by No1tovote4
There was a portion of his original post in the "joining" thread he created that spoke of something members had to sign saying "There is no God but Man". This seems to be directly discounting the importance of the existence of the Architect, and is incompatible with current Western and Eastern religions. The Eastern religions believe that all things that live and are part of nature are all part of God, the Western ones believe that God brought all of these into existence.
Originally posted by Cug
7) The Sex Magick stuff is like a carrot on a stick, most members never reach that high in the order (In 2002 there were 89 members higher than V) if your intrest lies in just that you would be better off studying Tantric Yoga.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
In my opinion, this is a far cry from discounting God's importance. Instead, it places God in a very important position. From this viewpoint, God is not a distant, ethereal entity outside of any comprehension. Instead, God is the very Life and Intelligence of Man.
Originally posted by sebatwerk
But wouldn't this mean that the concept of a SUPREME BEING is, if anything, inapplicable to this point of view?
Originally posted by Masonic Light
The document he was referring to is Liber Oz. The quote "There is no God but Man" is actually quite consistent with eastern philosophy, especially Taoism, Buddhism, and some branches of Hinduism. Mohandes Gandhi himself was quoted as confirming his belief that "the people in total are God", which seems to be very close to what Crowley was saying. In other words, it's not denying the existence of a Deity, but is instead identifying Deity with humanity.
In my opinion, this is a far cry from discounting God's importance. Instead, it places God in a very important position. From this viewpoint, God is not a distant, ethereal entity outside of any comprehension. Instead, God is the very Life and Intelligence of Man.
Originally posted by No1tovote4
It is somewhat consistent with Buddhist philosophy, but not exactly,
It specifically denies, especially in western religions, the Deity as a separate entity.
Thus it specifically requests many who enter to deny a major portion of their religious beliefs.
This is against Masonic tradition in that it asks one to change their beliefs to fit the Brotherhood and not creating a Brotherhood that fits all beliefs.
IMO These Fraternities would be mutually exclusive for the reasons listed above.
Originally posted by sebatwerk
But wouldn't this mean that the concept of a SUPREME BEING is, if anything, inapplicable to this point of view?
Originally posted by Masonic Light
Originally posted by sebatwerk
But wouldn't this mean that the concept of a SUPREME BEING is, if anything, inapplicable to this point of view?
There is a mystical interpretation of the biblical quote about man being created in the image of God that says that God manifests Himself ultimately in Man. Likewise Dr. J.D. Buck, in his book "Mystic Masonry", makes a similar claim: "humanity in toto" is God. Whether or not Buck and Crowley were right or wrong in this assumption, the viewpoint expressed is consistent from the mystical perspective. In it, God is indeed the Supreme Being, because He is Supreme over His individual manifestations, i.e., us.