It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by worldwatcher
is it worth the more lives that will be lost when the terrorists retaliate against innocent civilians? is it worth escalating the danger that our troops face in Iraq?
Originally posted by worldwatcher
the truth might cause some people to lose their jobs, but will it get us out of Iraq? i don't think it will, so why not just delay the truth a bit, or be less graphic about it. I mean, why not describe the video, provide a transcript, while that will certainly get attention, it will not invoke as much anger against us as vivid imagery would.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
Originally posted by billybob
war on terror is a prefabricated lie.
Are you being illogical or sarcastic? Is the war a "prefabricated lie" or is terror a "prefabricated lie?" It seems to me that both are deathly real and from where I stand, it's going to be a very long war, so those who are on the side of freedom better get united and get a handle on the situation or things are going to get a lot worse.
Originally posted by worldwatcher
billybob you're taking this way out of context and bringing in a whole lot more than what needs to be in the discussion.
Facts:
Abuse at Abu Ghraib is known
We all know that there are pictures and videos
We have all the knowledge already needed to convince us to get out of Iraq
We can't get out of Iraq
Release of a video is not needed to express opposition and wishes to leave iraq.
Release of a video at this time, after the photo scandal has quieted will only incite more terror.
It's a known fact that the insurgents are Iraqis and very few remaining are foreign fighters, however it doesn't help anything to get them riled up, who suffers? Not the bigheads in washington, not the bigheads behind their desks, not the bigheads with their machine guns and tanks, it is the people, the civilians of Iraq that will suffer the most from this.
Rising in revolt against established authority, especially a government.
Rebelling against the leadership of a political party.
Originally posted by worldwatcher
we call them insurgents because the definition of insurgent is as follows:
Rising in revolt against established authority, especially a government.
Rebelling against the leadership of a political party.
the term insurgent has nothing to with which country they may be born in, or their religion, sect, etc. Insurgent is anyone who rebels against govt.
and you're right, we don't have to agree
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
The photographs are superfluous. Everyone knows that there were abuses at Abu Ghraib. Everyone knows that heads have rolled, so to speak. Publication of the photos will only gratify our enemies. Only the enemy would campaign for their release.
Originally posted by curme
Do you believe the American public knows about prisoners (male and female) being raped at Abu Gharib? Sodomized? Killed? Do you believe the American public knows these acts were committed on children?
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
Do you?
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
There's no reason to release these photos except to gratify the perverse interest of those who post threads like this.
Originally posted by XXXX
Uh, what if the pictures ARE actually from Abu Ghraib prison, and do show what they supposedly show, but were taken BEFORE the U.S. invasion when saddam was still in control?
Be really easy for a bunch of U.S. bashers on ATS and elsewhere to try and pretend they were taken later when the U.S. was running the prison.
Originally posted by XXXX
These pictures aren't being released because THEY DON'T EXHIST.
'Soon to be released' yeah right. Still waiting.
'trust me they show women and children being raped' ... yeah right.
1 - We don't rape women and children. We don't rape soldiers either.
....
2 - The only ones STUPID enough to take home videos of rapes was
SADDAM and his sons. Which they did all the time.
Originally posted by XXXX
*ALSO OF NOTE:
rape of young boys in the islamic culture is about as accepted as it is in American prisons... so it is very possible that many of these pics are off IRAQIS raping Iraqi young while being incarcerated...
Originally posted by billybob
the 'insurgents' have(how can you be insurgent, when you already live there? only 5% of 'insurgents' actually insurge. the vast majority of FREEDOM FIGHTERS are native iraqis. this is a great example of how newspeak twists the mind.)
Originally posted by billybob
'established government' might be the tricky phrase in this case, as there is no established government as it was blowed up real good by america.
you might say america is the insurgent, in this case.
Originally posted by FlyersFanAll the idiot insurgents are doing is causing Americans and
the Coalition of the Willing to have to stay longer. When the insurgents
stop killing Iraqis and stop blowing up oil lines, then we can pull out and
go home.
Originally posted by worldwatcher
It would be unwise for the US to release any more horrible images from Abu Ghraib. It would jeopardize the security of even more of our troops, instill more hatred into the terrorists and cause many more to question our actions in Iraq. So unless someone leaks it, I don't think we should be seeing those videos anytime soon. It's a matter of national security.
(i hate when I forget to complete a thought:duh
[edit on 7-25-2005 by worldwatcher]
Originally posted by phoenixhasrisin
RELEASE THE PICTURES NOW!!!
MAKE AMERICANS FACE WHAT THEY HAVE BEEN SUPPORTING......
LET THEM KNOW THE TRUE COST OF HAVING GAS AT UNDER THREE DOLLARS A GALLON....